論惡意訴訟及其規(guī)制
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-06 07:55
【摘要】：隨著社會和經濟的不斷進步，社會競爭愈加激烈，人們的利益沖突愈發(fā)突兀，致使社會糾紛不斷發(fā)生，訴訟越來越多，且日益復雜化，而且惡意訴訟現象日趨嚴重，這種現象不僅侵害了他人的合法權益，還嚴重損害了司法公平正義，極大的浪費了司法資源，嚴重干擾了司法秩序，社會危害增大，引起越來越多的關注。新民事訴訟法增加了第一百一十二條、第一百一十三條兩個條款規(guī)定，對當事人之間惡意串通,企圖通過訴訟、調解等方式侵害他人合法權益的，以及被執(zhí)行人與他人惡意串通，通過訴訟、仲裁、調解等方式逃避履行法律文書確定的義務的共兩種情形作出了針對性規(guī)定。該些規(guī)定都積極反應了司法實踐的訴求，使得規(guī)制當事人雙方惡意串通進行損害他人合法權益或者逃避執(zhí)行的惡意訴訟行為，第一次有了法律上的依據。但是惡意訴訟問題的存在且不斷蔓延，，所以對惡意訴訟的法律規(guī)制已經迫在眉睫。 惡意訴訟不僅僅是我國獨有的問題，不管是大陸法系還是英美法系的域外國家，都同樣面對著惡意訴訟問題，都對這一問題進行了探索和規(guī)制。本文分別對大陸法系和英美法系作了探索并對二者關于民事惡意訴訟的規(guī)制作了對比，為我國更好的應對民事惡意訴訟問題提出了經驗，我國可以借鑒國外經驗更好的完善我國立法體系。 本文借鑒大陸法系和英美法系的理論基礎和規(guī)制措施對我國惡意訴訟問題進行了比較深入的探討，全文內容共分為以下四個部分。 首先通過五個典型的案例引出惡意訴訟現象，然后提出惡意訴訟的概念及其表現形式，并利用比較分析法對惡意訴訟相似概念進行辨析。對惡意訴訟進行綜合性分析進而發(fā)現惡意訴訟生成的原因，對惡意訴訟生成的多方面原因進一步進行分析,并對惡意訴訟產生的后果作了具體的說明。對惡意訴訟侵權行為的立法從實際出發(fā)，具體分析大陸法系和英美法系先進的立法對惡意訴訟的規(guī)制模式，對規(guī)制我國惡意訴訟提出經驗和借鑒。最后鑒于立法問題絕非是惡意訴訟生成的唯一問題，因此，結合當前立法現狀并根據實踐操作的可行性，從多個方面對惡意訴訟的法律規(guī)制提出應對之策。
[Abstract]:With the continuous progress of society and economy, the social competition is becoming more and more fierce, and the conflicts of interest of people become more and more abrupt, resulting in more and more social disputes, more and more litigation, and more malicious litigation, and the phenomenon of malicious litigation is becoming more and more serious. This phenomenon not only infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of others, but also seriously damages judicial fairness and justice, wastes judicial resources, seriously interferes with judicial order, increases social harm, and attracts more and more attention. The new Code of Civil procedure has added articles 112 and 113 to provide for malicious collusion between the parties in an attempt to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of others by means of litigation, mediation, etc. And the executor and others malicious collusion, through litigation, arbitration, mediation and other ways to evade the obligations determined by the legal documents made specific provisions. These provisions all positively reflect the appeal of judicial practice, which makes it possible to regulate the malicious litigation of both parties in malicious collusion to injure the legitimate rights and interests of others or to evade execution, for the first time, there is a legal basis for regulating the malicious actions of both parties. But the existence and spread of malicious litigation problem, so the legal regulation of malicious litigation is imminent. Malicious litigation is not only a unique problem in China, but also faces the problem of malicious litigation in both the civil law system and the extra-territorial countries of Anglo-American law system, which has been explored and regulated. This paper explores the civil law system and Anglo-American law system respectively, and makes a comparison between the two rules on civil malicious litigation, and puts forward the experience for our country to deal with the problem of civil malicious litigation better. Our country may draw lessons from the foreign experience better consummates our country legislation system. Based on the theoretical basis and regulatory measures of the civil law system and the common law system, this paper makes a deep discussion on the malicious litigation in China. The content of this paper is divided into the following four parts. This paper first introduces the phenomenon of malicious litigation through five typical cases, then puts forward the concept of malicious litigation and its forms of expression, and analyzes the similar concept of malicious litigation by comparative analysis. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of malicious litigation and finds out the causes of the formation of malicious litigation, and further analyzes the various causes of malicious litigation, and makes a concrete explanation of the consequences of malicious litigation. The legislation of malicious litigation tort is based on the reality, and analyzes the regulation mode of the advanced legislation of civil law system and Anglo-American law system, and puts forward the experience and reference to the regulation of malicious litigation in our country. Finally, considering that legislation is by no means the only problem of malicious litigation, combined with the current legislative situation and the feasibility of practical operation, the author puts forward some countermeasures for the legal regulation of malicious litigation from many aspects.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2225715
[Abstract]:With the continuous progress of society and economy, the social competition is becoming more and more fierce, and the conflicts of interest of people become more and more abrupt, resulting in more and more social disputes, more and more litigation, and more malicious litigation, and the phenomenon of malicious litigation is becoming more and more serious. This phenomenon not only infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of others, but also seriously damages judicial fairness and justice, wastes judicial resources, seriously interferes with judicial order, increases social harm, and attracts more and more attention. The new Code of Civil procedure has added articles 112 and 113 to provide for malicious collusion between the parties in an attempt to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of others by means of litigation, mediation, etc. And the executor and others malicious collusion, through litigation, arbitration, mediation and other ways to evade the obligations determined by the legal documents made specific provisions. These provisions all positively reflect the appeal of judicial practice, which makes it possible to regulate the malicious litigation of both parties in malicious collusion to injure the legitimate rights and interests of others or to evade execution, for the first time, there is a legal basis for regulating the malicious actions of both parties. But the existence and spread of malicious litigation problem, so the legal regulation of malicious litigation is imminent. Malicious litigation is not only a unique problem in China, but also faces the problem of malicious litigation in both the civil law system and the extra-territorial countries of Anglo-American law system, which has been explored and regulated. This paper explores the civil law system and Anglo-American law system respectively, and makes a comparison between the two rules on civil malicious litigation, and puts forward the experience for our country to deal with the problem of civil malicious litigation better. Our country may draw lessons from the foreign experience better consummates our country legislation system. Based on the theoretical basis and regulatory measures of the civil law system and the common law system, this paper makes a deep discussion on the malicious litigation in China. The content of this paper is divided into the following four parts. This paper first introduces the phenomenon of malicious litigation through five typical cases, then puts forward the concept of malicious litigation and its forms of expression, and analyzes the similar concept of malicious litigation by comparative analysis. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of malicious litigation and finds out the causes of the formation of malicious litigation, and further analyzes the various causes of malicious litigation, and makes a concrete explanation of the consequences of malicious litigation. The legislation of malicious litigation tort is based on the reality, and analyzes the regulation mode of the advanced legislation of civil law system and Anglo-American law system, and puts forward the experience and reference to the regulation of malicious litigation in our country. Finally, considering that legislation is by no means the only problem of malicious litigation, combined with the current legislative situation and the feasibility of practical operation, the author puts forward some countermeasures for the legal regulation of malicious litigation from many aspects.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張曉薇;濫用訴訟權利之比較研究[J];比較法研究;2004年04期
2 劉輝;;惡意訴訟——一種新型的侵權行為[J];法制與社會;2008年15期
3 章曉洪;論惡意訴訟[J];河北法學;2005年05期
4 謝志強;惡意民事訴訟應納入妨害司法罪[J];檢察實踐;2005年02期
5 李浩;;虛假訴訟中惡意調解問題研究[J];江海學刊;2012年01期
6 賀海仁;自我救濟的權利[J];法學研究;2005年04期
7 李正文;完善救濟權法律制度[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2001年03期
8 姜樂;;民事撤訴制度的法理及相關立法[J];理論界;2006年06期
9 丁吁平,楊翠蓮,姚嵐;也析訴訟欺詐案件的定性[J];人民檢察;2002年02期
10 張榕;;司法克制下的司法能動[J];現代法學;2008年02期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 于海生;惡意訴訟侵權責任法律制度研究[D];黑龍江大學;2010年
本文編號：2225715
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2225715.html
