【摘要】：我國(guó)死刑復(fù)核程序目前實(shí)行全面審查原則,既審理法律問題也審理事實(shí)問題。刑事訴訟法本身并沒有要求死刑復(fù)核程序?qū)嵭腥鎸彶�。由于刑事訴訟中絕對(duì)真實(shí)不可能實(shí)現(xiàn),對(duì)事實(shí)的反復(fù)審理不但浪費(fèi)大量的司法資源,與最高法院的職責(zé)不符,而且無(wú)法避免的事實(shí)誤認(rèn)將對(duì)最高法院的權(quán)威構(gòu)成傷害。因此,最高法院死刑復(fù)核程序應(yīng)當(dāng)限于法律問題的審理,即法律適用問題和程序違法的后果問題。
[Abstract]:At present, the procedure of death penalty review in our country is based on the principle of comprehensive examination, which tries both legal and factual issues. The Code of Criminal procedure itself does not require a comprehensive review of the death penalty review procedure. Because it is absolutely impossible to realize the truth in criminal proceedings, the repeated trial of facts not only wastes a large number of judicial resources, and does not conform to the duties of the Supreme Court, but also the unavoidable mistake of facts will harm the authority of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the Supreme Court's death penalty review procedure should be limited to the trial of legal issues, that is, the application of law and the consequences of procedural violations.
【作者單位】： "2011計(jì)劃"司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;中國(guó)政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)青年創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)項(xiàng)目“死刑的程序控制”的階段性成果之一
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜保忠;;司法裁判中法律問題與事實(shí)問題的區(qū)分——以兩起影響性訴訟為樣本[J];理論與改革;2008年06期

2 曹國(guó)英;;從上訴的目的看我國(guó)審級(jí)制度的改造和重構(gòu)[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2006年06期

3 林莉紅;論行政訴訟中的事實(shí)、法律問題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1998年05期

4 方麗冬;盧婧Z，

本文編號(hào)：2218800