【摘要】：刑事抗訴制度是人民檢察院認(rèn)為人民法院的刑事判決或裁定確有錯誤時，依照法定訴訟程序，要求人民法院重新審理并改判的一種法律監(jiān)督制度。刑事抗訴包括二審程序的刑事抗訴和審判監(jiān)督程序的刑事抗訴兩種。刑事抗訴權(quán)作為公訴權(quán)的一項重要權(quán)能,是刑事訴訟法賦予檢察機關(guān)的一項重要的刑事審判監(jiān)督職能。當(dāng)然刑事抗訴不僅具有訴訟監(jiān)督功能，同時還有犯罪追訴功能和訴訟教育功能，刑事抗訴的價值追求就是把三重價值功能有效地發(fā)揮出來。 我國法律賦予了檢察機關(guān)較為廣泛的法律監(jiān)督職能享有較為廣泛的抗訴權(quán)，這既符合我國的國家性質(zhì)，也符合我國的訴訟理念。然而在司法實踐中，由于刑事抗訴制度研究不足，我國法律體系的不健全等原因致使我國的刑事抗訴制度存在很多的問題，直接影響了我國法治建設(shè)。 在司法實踐中我國刑事抗訴制度在立法層面存在很多的問題。在司法實踐中，刑事審判監(jiān)督權(quán)與公訴權(quán)的直接合一，在很大程度上都淡化了人民檢察院正確積極的行使抗訴權(quán)。在人民法院方面，法院的內(nèi)部保護(hù)主義，，法院上級請示現(xiàn)象都阻礙著檢察機關(guān)積極正確行使刑事抗訴權(quán)。立法層面，抗訴機制等方面存在的問題都嚴(yán)重阻礙著我國檢察機關(guān)正確積極行使抗訴權(quán)，因此，進(jìn)一步完善我國刑事抗訴制度應(yīng)經(jīng)迫在眉睫。針對我國刑事抗訴制度所存在的問題，筆者通過自己的研究提出了一些有益對策，如確立完善我國抗訴制度應(yīng)堅持的原則，進(jìn)一步明確刑事抗訴的條件，擴大檢察機關(guān)刑事抗訴案件的范圍，確立明確規(guī)定檢察長列席同級人民法院審判委員會討論抗訴案件的制度。
[Abstract]:The criminal protest system is a kind of legal supervision system that the people's procuratorate thinks that the criminal judgment or ruling of the people's court is wrong and requires the people's court to try and revise the sentence again according to the legal procedure. Criminal protest includes criminal protest of second instance procedure and criminal protest of trial supervision procedure. As an important power of public prosecution, criminal protest right is an important function of criminal trial supervision given to procuratorial organs by criminal procedure law. Of course, the criminal protest not only has the function of lawsuit supervision, but also has the function of criminal prosecution and litigation education. The value pursuit of criminal protest is to give full play to the function of triple value. The law of our country has given the procuratorial organ extensive legal supervision function to enjoy the more extensive right of protest, which not only accords with the national nature of our country, but also accords with the litigation idea of our country. However, in judicial practice, due to the lack of research on the criminal protest system and the unsound legal system of our country, there are many problems in the criminal protest system of our country, which directly affects the construction of the rule of law in our country. In the judicial practice, there are many problems in the system of criminal protest in our country. In judicial practice, the direct integration of the right of criminal trial supervision and the right of public prosecution, to a great extent, has weakened the people's procuratorate's right to exercise the right of protest correctly and actively. In the aspect of people's court, the internal protectionism of the court and the request of the superior of the court all hinder the procuratorial organ from exercising the right of criminal protest actively and correctly. At the legislative level, the problems existing in the mechanism of protest seriously hinder the procuratorial organs to exercise the right of protest correctly and actively. Therefore, it is urgent to further improve the system of criminal protest in our country. In view of the problems existing in our country's criminal protest system, the author puts forward some useful countermeasures through his own research, such as establishing the principles that should be adhered to in the perfection of our country's protest system, and further clarifying the conditions for criminal protest. To expand the scope of criminal protest cases of procuratorial organs and to establish a system of clear provisions for the procurator to attend the same level of people's court trial committee to discuss protest cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 鄧思清;論審判監(jiān)督的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

2 虞政平;我國再審制度的淵源、弊端及完善建議[J];政法論壇;2003年02期

3 汪建成,祁建建;論訴權(quán)理論在刑事訴訟中的導(dǎo)入[J];中國法學(xué);2002年06期

4 張智輝;法律監(jiān)督三辨析[J];中國法學(xué);2003年05期

5 宋英輝,李哲;一事不再理原則研究[J];中國法學(xué);2004年05期

6 史衛(wèi)忠;論刑事抗訴權(quán)與檢察權(quán)、審判權(quán)的關(guān)系[J];中國刑事法雜志;1999年05期

7 毛國輝;論法治社會與現(xiàn)代程序法理念的重塑[J];政治與法律;1998年03期

本文編號：2209693