行政訴訟調(diào)解制度法律問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-20 07:31
【摘要】：新《行政訴訟法》確立了行政訴訟調(diào)解制度,使我國行政訴訟不再局限于審判和撤訴兩種結(jié)案方式,實踐中以撤訴為結(jié)案手段的“隱形調(diào)解”正式進入法律規(guī)制的范圍內(nèi),行政訴訟調(diào)解制度的確立也引發(fā)了學(xué)界對于行政訴訟調(diào)解具體適用的討論和探究。隨著我國公民權(quán)利意識的高漲和登記立案制度的實行,近年來行政案件呈遞增趨勢,復(fù)雜的行政糾紛和有限的司法資源使得司法機關(guān)在超負荷運行,調(diào)解制度的定紛止?fàn)幑δ芫哂衅渌贫葻o法比擬的優(yōu)勢,該制度的確立是我國行政訴訟制度發(fā)展的體現(xiàn),也是構(gòu)建法治社會、和諧社會的成果。行政訴訟法首次確立行政訴訟調(diào)解制度,僅抽象性、原則性的法律規(guī)定使得該制度在法律適用上出現(xiàn)立法缺失的現(xiàn)狀,在司法實踐中容易出現(xiàn)一些問題。簡單延續(xù)以往參照民事訴訟相關(guān)制度的做法忽略了行政訴訟之于民事訴訟的特殊性,與行政訴訟調(diào)解制度建立之初立法者的意圖相悖。調(diào)解制度和撤訴制度沒有在程序上徹底區(qū)分開來,易在實踐中混為一談�，F(xiàn)有行政訴訟調(diào)解制度缺乏具體規(guī)則和監(jiān)督機制,使得該制度在在適用的過程中極易被濫用、被異化,不能充分尊重當(dāng)事人的意愿和保護他們的合法權(quán)益。當(dāng)前的行政訴訟體系下,完善行政訴訟調(diào)解制度是必要的。本文首先分析了行政訴訟調(diào)解的內(nèi)涵和相關(guān)概念,以便對行政訴訟調(diào)解有個清晰的認識和定性,然后對我國行政訴訟調(diào)解主流觀點的發(fā)展進行闡述并論述了行政訴訟調(diào)解制度的價值,接著分析了我國現(xiàn)在的立法缺陷和實踐中可能會出現(xiàn)的問題,最后針對相關(guān)問題對該制度相關(guān)規(guī)則的完善提出一些本人的看法。完善行政訴訟調(diào)解制度,首先要充分理解合法自愿原則和把握其審查標準,行政自由裁量案件的厘定是行政訴訟案件的難點;其次,具體程序的設(shè)定應(yīng)明確調(diào)解的啟動時間是在受理行政案件后到行政判決前和法院對于調(diào)解申請和調(diào)解協(xié)議的審查程序和標準;最后是調(diào)解達成之后的救濟程序和再審程序的啟動,包括當(dāng)事人在調(diào)解書生效前擁有反悔權(quán)等都是本文論述的主要內(nèi)容。登記立案制度的確立使得行政訴訟案件激增、面對更多更復(fù)雜的案件,法院面臨著重大挑戰(zhàn)。在行政訴訟調(diào)解制度建立的初期,需要建立具體的規(guī)則用以規(guī)范調(diào)解行為,法院在適用上也面臨著新的問題和挑戰(zhàn),該制度還處于自我完善和不斷糾錯的過程中,仍需要實踐的不斷積累和理論的不斷完善。
[Abstract]:The new Administrative Procedure Law establishes the administrative litigation mediation system, which makes the administrative litigation in China no longer confined to trial and withdrawal. In practice, the "invisible mediation" with withdrawal as the means of closing a case formally enters the scope of legal regulation. The establishment of the administrative litigation mediation system also triggers the specific adjustment of the academic circles to the administrative litigation mediation. With the rising awareness of civil rights and the implementation of the registration and filing system in China, administrative cases have shown an increasing trend in recent years. The complex administrative disputes and limited judicial resources make the judicial organs run overloaded. The function of mediation system to settle disputes has advantages that other systems can not compare with. Establishment is the embodiment of the development of the administrative litigation system in China, and also the result of the construction of a society ruled by law and a harmonious society. In the past, the practice of referring to the relevant systems of civil litigation neglected the particularity of administrative litigation to civil litigation, which was contrary to the intention of legislators at the beginning of the establishment of administrative litigation mediation system. Under the current administrative litigation system, it is necessary to improve the administrative litigation mediation system. This paper first analyzes the connotation and related concepts of administrative litigation mediation, so as to make it easier to abuse and alienate the system in the process of application. There is a clear understanding and nature of administrative litigation mediation. Then it expounds the development of the mainstream view of administrative litigation mediation in China and discusses the value of administrative litigation mediation system. Then it analyzes the current legislative defects and problems that may arise in practice. Finally, it perfects the relevant rules of the system in view of relevant problems. In order to perfect the mediation system of administrative litigation, we should first fully understand the principle of legitimate voluntariness and grasp its examination standard. The determination of administrative discretion cases is the difficulty of administrative litigation cases; secondly, the setting of specific procedures should make it clear that the starting time of mediation is from the acceptance of administrative cases to the administrative judgment and before the court. The main content of this article is to examine the procedure and standard of mediation application and mediation agreement; finally, to initiate the relief procedure and retrial procedure after conciliation, including the party's right of repentance before conciliation comes into effect. In the early days of the establishment of the administrative litigation mediation system, it is necessary to establish specific rules to regulate the mediation behavior. The court is also facing new problems and challenges in its application. The system is still in the process of self-improvement and constant error correction, and still needs the continuous accumulation of practice and theoretical improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2192879
[Abstract]:The new Administrative Procedure Law establishes the administrative litigation mediation system, which makes the administrative litigation in China no longer confined to trial and withdrawal. In practice, the "invisible mediation" with withdrawal as the means of closing a case formally enters the scope of legal regulation. The establishment of the administrative litigation mediation system also triggers the specific adjustment of the academic circles to the administrative litigation mediation. With the rising awareness of civil rights and the implementation of the registration and filing system in China, administrative cases have shown an increasing trend in recent years. The complex administrative disputes and limited judicial resources make the judicial organs run overloaded. The function of mediation system to settle disputes has advantages that other systems can not compare with. Establishment is the embodiment of the development of the administrative litigation system in China, and also the result of the construction of a society ruled by law and a harmonious society. In the past, the practice of referring to the relevant systems of civil litigation neglected the particularity of administrative litigation to civil litigation, which was contrary to the intention of legislators at the beginning of the establishment of administrative litigation mediation system. Under the current administrative litigation system, it is necessary to improve the administrative litigation mediation system. This paper first analyzes the connotation and related concepts of administrative litigation mediation, so as to make it easier to abuse and alienate the system in the process of application. There is a clear understanding and nature of administrative litigation mediation. Then it expounds the development of the mainstream view of administrative litigation mediation in China and discusses the value of administrative litigation mediation system. Then it analyzes the current legislative defects and problems that may arise in practice. Finally, it perfects the relevant rules of the system in view of relevant problems. In order to perfect the mediation system of administrative litigation, we should first fully understand the principle of legitimate voluntariness and grasp its examination standard. The determination of administrative discretion cases is the difficulty of administrative litigation cases; secondly, the setting of specific procedures should make it clear that the starting time of mediation is from the acceptance of administrative cases to the administrative judgment and before the court. The main content of this article is to examine the procedure and standard of mediation application and mediation agreement; finally, to initiate the relief procedure and retrial procedure after conciliation, including the party's right of repentance before conciliation comes into effect. In the early days of the establishment of the administrative litigation mediation system, it is necessary to establish specific rules to regulate the mediation behavior. The court is also facing new problems and challenges in its application. The system is still in the process of self-improvement and constant error correction, and still needs the continuous accumulation of practice and theoretical improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李淮;;行政補償訴訟救濟狀況實證研究——以325份裁判文書為樣本[J];中國石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2016年04期
2 程琥;;穿行于法治理想與現(xiàn)實之間的新《行政訴訟法》[J];人民法治;2016年07期
3 周上欽;肖北庚;;行政訴訟制度之治理現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型與構(gòu)建[J];求索;2016年01期
4 王曉強;賀日開;;行政訴訟調(diào)解制度的相關(guān)問題探析——以新修訂的《行政訴訟法》為研究對象[J];行政與法;2015年10期
5 曹剛;;訴訟調(diào)解的倫理辯護[J];道德與文明;2015年05期
6 樊傳明;;我國行政司法運行情況的實證評估[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2015年02期
7 梁秋花;;多元化糾紛解決機制中的行政調(diào)解研究[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2015年02期
8 高銘暄;張慧;;論受賄犯罪的幾個問題[J];法學(xué)論壇;2015年01期
9 于洋;萬秀蓉;;行政訴訟調(diào)解制度在我國建立的基礎(chǔ)[J];現(xiàn)代婦女(下旬);2014年08期
10 劉潔;;淺析行政訴訟調(diào)解存在的合理性[J];法制與社會;2014年24期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 劉澤;;依法審理行政和國家賠償案件 促進國家機關(guān)依法行使職權(quán)[N];人民法院報;2015年
，本文編號：2192879
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2192879.html
