【摘要】：民事訴訟已經(jīng)成為公民維護(hù)合法權(quán)益和解決爭(zhēng)議的重要手段之一。民事案件的數(shù)量亦與日俱增。但近年來(lái)頻繁出現(xiàn)的雙方當(dāng)事人以訴訟這一合法形式謀取不正當(dāng)利益的民事虛假訴訟卻使“訴訟”這一“正義化”象征蒙上了一層陰影。它在嚴(yán)重侵害利害關(guān)系人合法權(quán)益的同時(shí)亦造成了司法資源的浪費(fèi)、挑戰(zhàn)了司法公信力。由于立法固有的滯后性特點(diǎn),我國(guó)現(xiàn)行民事訴訟立法中尚缺乏系統(tǒng)性、針對(duì)性的法律條文對(duì)此進(jìn)行規(guī)制,極易導(dǎo)致各地法院在個(gè)案中對(duì)于民事虛假訴訟的處理方式各行其是。本文恰以此為契機(jī),針對(duì)民事虛假訴訟問(wèn)題展開研究。文章將在遵循解決問(wèn)題常規(guī)脈絡(luò)的基礎(chǔ)上,突出民事虛假訴訟在司法實(shí)踐中的典型表現(xiàn),深度挖掘引發(fā)民事虛假訴訟的內(nèi)外因素,以期通過(guò)識(shí)別機(jī)制和應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制的構(gòu)建,規(guī)范訴訟當(dāng)事人及其他訴訟參與人的訴訟行為,維護(hù)司法的權(quán)威性、公正性。本文共分民事虛假訴訟類型化分析及表現(xiàn)形式、民事虛假訴訟的界定、我國(guó)民事虛假訴訟法律缺陷、各國(guó)關(guān)于民事虛假訴訟法律比較研究、民事虛假訴訟立法建議四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述。論文第一部分民事虛假訴訟的界定。首先,圍繞作為本文選題的民事虛假訴訟進(jìn)行語(yǔ)義學(xué)分析,揭示出民事虛假訴訟的本質(zhì);在此基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)民事虛假訴訟內(nèi)涵及特點(diǎn)的闡釋,意圖深化對(duì)民事虛假訴訟本質(zhì)的認(rèn)識(shí);其次,通過(guò)相關(guān)概念間的對(duì)比分析,試圖厘清彼此間的界限,再度明確本文的研究對(duì)象。論文第二部分民事虛假訴訟類型化分析及表現(xiàn)形式。首先將列舉民事虛假訴訟典型案例,以闡明民事虛假訴訟的表現(xiàn)形態(tài);其次將綜合分析導(dǎo)致民事虛假訴訟生成的內(nèi)外因素,以尋求解決民事虛假訴訟問(wèn)題的有利突破口。第三部分從民事、刑事及司法領(lǐng)域方面明確指出我國(guó)法律對(duì)民事虛假訴訟規(guī)制的缺陷,以說(shuō)明規(guī)制的必要性。論文第四部分 民事虛假訴訟立法建議,旨在構(gòu)建多元化的民事虛假訴訟的應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Civil litigation has become one of the important means for citizens to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests and to resolve disputes. The number of civil cases is also increasing. However, in recent years, the litigants have frequently appeared in the civil false litigation of seeking improper interests in the legal form of litigation, which has cast a shadow over the symbol of "litigation" as a "just". It not only seriously infringes the legitimate rights and interests of interested parties, but also causes the waste of judicial resources and challenges the judicial credibility. Due to the inherent lag characteristics of legislation, there is still a lack of systematization in the current civil litigation legislation in our country, which is easily regulated by the relevant legal provisions, which can easily lead to different ways of handling civil false litigation in various courts in individual cases. This paper takes this as an opportunity to study the problem of civil false litigation. On the basis of following the conventional context of solving problems, the article will highlight the typical performance of civil false litigation in judicial practice, and dig deeply into the internal and external factors that lead to civil false litigation, in order to construct the identification mechanism and the coping mechanism. Standardize litigants and other litigants and maintain judicial authority and impartiality. This article divides into the civil false litigation type analysis and the manifestation form, the civil false lawsuit definition, our country civil false lawsuit law flaw, the various countries about the civil false lawsuit law comparison research, Four parts of the legislative proposal of civil false litigation are discussed. The first part is the definition of civil false litigation. First of all, the semantic analysis of the civil false litigation, which is the subject of this paper, reveals the essence of the civil false litigation, and on this basis, through the interpretation of the connotation and characteristics of the civil false litigation, The author intends to deepen the understanding of the nature of civil false litigation. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of relevant concepts, it tries to clarify the boundaries between each other and clarify the research object of this paper again. The second part of the thesis analyzes the types and forms of civil false litigation. Firstly, it will enumerate the typical cases of civil false litigation to clarify the manifestation of civil false litigation; secondly, it will comprehensively analyze the internal and external factors leading to the formation of civil false litigation, in order to seek a favorable breakthrough to solve the problem of civil false litigation. In the third part, the author points out the defects of our country's law in the field of civil, criminal and judicial in order to explain the necessity of the regulation. The fourth part of the thesis is about the legislative suggestions of civil false litigation, aiming to build a diversified response mechanism of civil false litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 黃海濤;郭京霞;紹勇;常鳴;;遏制虛假訴訟迫在眉睫[J];法庭內(nèi)外;2009年12期

2 王博;;論虛假訴訟與程序法規(guī)制[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年29期

3 李龍;;民事訴訟欺詐與應(yīng)對(duì)策略研究[J];人民司法;2006年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2191373