【摘要】：起訴便宜主義已經在世界范圍內得到了確立,其發(fā)展順應了世界刑事訴訟發(fā)展的趨勢。日本和德國是大陸法系國家中實施起訴便宜主義比較典型的國家,而在英美法系國家中,其應用則要更加廣泛。相對不起訴制度和附條件不起訴制度是我國運用起訴便宜主義的兩種主要形式,但是這兩種制度目前在立法和實踐中尚有很多不完備的地方,特別是附條件不起訴,其在實踐中雖然有一定的基礎,但是作為一項新確立的制度不可避免的會有爭議存在,相關配套制度也亟待完善。 本文共分有四部分的主要內容,第一部分是有關起訴便宜主義的總體介紹,包括其基本內容、理論基礎、域外適用等。第二部分是我國刑事追訴中運用起訴便宜主義的現狀及特征,本部分主要介紹我國運用起訴便宜主義的主要形式,并對其在立法和實踐兩個方面的情況進行分析,另外還介紹了我國當前刑事訴訟法中的公訴撤回制度,以及對起訴便宜主義在我國的運用特點的分析。第三部分是對我國當前刑事追訴中運用起訴便宜主義的合理性與非合理性的分析,運用起訴便宜主義是與我國目前的刑事政策、司法現狀以及人權保障理念相統(tǒng)一的,但是其在立法和實踐中受到多方面的限制,并不能完全發(fā)揮其功能。最后一部分是對我國完善起訴便宜主義提出一些建議,主要是針對相對不起訴、附條件不起訴、公訴撤回制度進行完善。
[Abstract]:The doctrine of cheap prosecution has been established all over the world, and its development conforms to the trend of the development of world criminal procedure. Japan and Germany are typical countries in the civil law system, but they are more widely used in common law countries. The relative non-prosecution system and the conditional non-prosecution system are the two main forms of our country's application of prosecution cheap doctrine, but these two systems still have many imperfections in legislation and practice, especially in conditional non-prosecution. Although it has a certain foundation in practice, as a newly established system, there will inevitably be disputes, and the relevant supporting systems need to be improved. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is about the general introduction of prosecution of cheap doctrine, including its basic content, theoretical basis, extraterritorial application and so on. The second part is the present situation and characteristics of the application of the doctrine of cheap prosecution in criminal prosecution in China. This part mainly introduces the main forms of using the doctrine of cheap prosecution in our country, and analyzes the situation in both legislation and practice. In addition, it also introduces the public prosecution withdrawal system in the current criminal procedure law of our country, and analyzes the characteristics of the application of the doctrine of cheap prosecution in our country. The third part is the analysis of the rationality and non-rationality of the application of the doctrine of cheap prosecution in the current criminal prosecution in our country. The application of cheap doctrine of prosecution is unified with the present criminal policy, the current situation of justice and the concept of human rights protection in our country. However, it is limited by many aspects in legislation and practice, and can not give full play to its function. The last part is to put forward some suggestions on how to perfect the cheap doctrine of prosecution in our country, mainly aiming at relative non-prosecution, conditional non-prosecution and the system of public prosecution withdrawing.
【學位授予單位】：青島大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊波;起訴便宜原則的法理性透析[J];當代法學;2002年03期

2 周長軍;;公訴權濫用論[J];法學家;2011年03期

3 甄貞;;英國附條件警告制度及其借鑒意義[J];法學家;2011年04期

4 王春 ,郝銀鐘;論起訴法定主義——兼談起訴便宜主義的可采性[J];法學;1993年09期

5 段明學;;起訴法定主義與起訴便宜主義——兼論我國起訴裁量權的完善[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學院學報;2008年01期

6 黃世斌;洪星;;寬嚴相濟刑事政策下裁量不起訴制度的價值取向及其運行[J];河北法學;2007年11期

7 肖靈;;論起訴便宜主義理念踐行——兼論暫緩起訴制度的發(fā)展[J];嘉應學院學報;2010年09期

8 陳衛(wèi)東;我國檢察權的反思與重構——以公訴權為核心的分析[J];法學研究;2002年02期

9 劉晴;段明學;;走向精密司法——日本起訴便宜主義論析[J];樂山師范學院學報;2006年07期

10 盧軍嶺;王瓊;;不起訴存在的問題及對策探討——Z市H區(qū)檢察院不起訴案件實證研究[J];中國檢察官;2011年17期

，

本文編號：2190375