【摘要】：刑事訴訟的主要作用是對犯罪事實(shí)進(jìn)行查明并適用法律進(jìn)行裁判。在庭審階段,犯罪事實(shí)的查明程序要發(fā)揮出應(yīng)有的功效,就應(yīng)當(dāng)有相應(yīng)的程序保障。然在現(xiàn)今的刑事訴訟庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序中存在許多的問題,如偵查結(jié)果成為法庭犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定的基礎(chǔ)、庭后閱卷、事實(shí)認(rèn)定無法定程序、自由心證的證據(jù)制度尚未確立、將犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定與證據(jù)的采信混為一談等等。因此在分析、研究目前庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序中存在的問題的基礎(chǔ)上,提出推進(jìn)以審判為中心的司法體制改革、建立以庭審為中心的犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定機(jī)制、建立自由心證的證據(jù)制度和構(gòu)建法官對犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定的操作程序,對我國的刑事訴訟立法、司法和刑事訴訟法學(xué)科的發(fā)展和刑事司法改革的推進(jìn)具有重要的意義和價值。 除引言和結(jié)語部分,本文共分為四章： 第一章,本章主要運(yùn)用語義分析的方法首先對犯罪事實(shí)、犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定、犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序等概念作出界定,以區(qū)分犯罪證據(jù)、證據(jù)的采信等概念,為后續(xù)的論述定基調(diào)；通過多角度的詞義解析,加深對犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序本身更為深刻、全面的認(rèn)識。 第二章,通過對兩大法系主要國家庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序的介紹和分析,比較兩大法系主要國家在庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序設(shè)置上的異同點(diǎn),明確兩大法系尤其是大陸法系國家對犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序的特點(diǎn),以便為構(gòu)建我國庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序提供可資借鑒的素材。 第三章,通過對我國目前庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定的主要特點(diǎn)的分析,指出我國現(xiàn)階段庭審程序設(shè)置和庭審?fù)七M(jìn)上存在的不足和缺陷,使下文構(gòu)建我國庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序的闡述更加具有針對性。 第四章,根據(jù)對犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序概念的界定,借鑒兩大法系尤其是大陸法系國家對犯罪事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序的設(shè)置經(jīng)驗(yàn),針對我國現(xiàn)階段庭審程序設(shè)置和庭審?fù)七M(jìn)上存在的不足和缺陷,運(yùn)用邏輯方法,提出推進(jìn)以庭審為中心的審判制度改革、建立自由心證的證據(jù)制度、構(gòu)建法官庭審階段犯罪事實(shí)的認(rèn)定程序,為刑訴法要求的“案件事實(shí)清楚”的法律規(guī)定提供可操作的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:The main function of criminal procedure is to find out the facts of crime and apply the law to judge. In the trial stage, the procedure of finding out the facts of crime should have the corresponding procedural guarantee in order to exert its due effect. However, there are many problems in the criminal fact determination procedure in the trial stage of the present criminal procedure. For example, the investigation result becomes the basis of the court crime fact determination, the post-court examination paper, the fact determination does not have the legal procedure, The evidence system of free evidence has not yet been established, and the identification of criminal facts is confused with the acceptance of evidence and so on. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing and studying the problems existing in the procedure of determining the fact of crime in the trial stage, this paper puts forward to promote the judicial system reform with the trial as the center, and establish the mechanism of the cognizance of the fact of the crime taking the trial as the center. It is of great significance and value to establish the evidence system of free evidence and the operating procedure of judge's cognizance of the fact of crime. It is of great significance and value to the legislation of criminal procedure, the development of the discipline of judicature and criminal procedure law and the advancement of the reform of criminal justice in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter mainly uses the method of semantic analysis to define the concepts of crime fact, criminal fact cognizance procedure and so on. In order to distinguish the concepts of criminal evidence and acceptance of evidence, this paper sets the tone for the subsequent discussion, and deepens the deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the procedure of determining the facts of crime through the analysis of word meanings from many angles. The second chapter, through the introduction and analysis of the criminal fact determination procedure in the trial stage of the main countries of the two legal systems, compares the similarities and differences between the two major legal system countries in the establishment of the procedure for the determination of the criminal facts in the trial stage. This paper clarifies the characteristics of the criminal fact determination procedure in the two major legal systems, especially in the continental law system, in order to provide reference material for the construction of the criminal fact determination procedure in the trial stage of our country. The third chapter, through the analysis of the main characteristics of the fact of the crime during the trial stage in our country, points out the shortcomings and defects in the setting up of the trial procedure and the advance of the court trial in our country at the present stage. So that the following construction of our country trial stage of criminal fact identification procedures more targeted. The fourth chapter, according to the definition of the concept of the criminal fact determination procedure, draw lessons from the experience of the establishment of the criminal fact determination procedure in the countries of the two major legal systems, especially the continental law system. In view of the deficiencies and defects in the setting up of court procedure and the advance of trial in our country at the present stage, this paper, by using the logical method, puts forward the reform of the trial system centered on the trial and the establishment of the evidence system of free evidence. In order to provide an operational standard for the legal stipulation of "clear facts of case" required by the Criminal procedure Law, we should construct the procedure of determining the fact of crime in the trial stage of the judge.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 張明楷;;案件事實(shí)的認(rèn)定方法[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年02期

2 郭華;;庭審案件事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序規(guī)則研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

3 肖莉;;論刑事案件事實(shí)認(rèn)定程序的理論探析[J];法制與社會;2010年09期

4 李鴻海;刑事偵查中的事實(shí)認(rèn)定和法律認(rèn)定[J];江蘇公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1999年03期

5 龍宗智;;論建立以一審?fù)彏橹行牡氖聦?shí)認(rèn)定機(jī)制[J];中國法學(xué);2010年02期

6 陳永生;法律事實(shí)與客觀事實(shí)的契合與背離——對證據(jù)制度史另一視覺的解讀[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

7 托馬斯·魏特根;吳宏耀;;刑事訴訟致力于事實(shí)真相么——一個德國人的視角[J];證據(jù)學(xué)論壇;2005年02期

，

本文編號：2179262