【摘要】：近年來,隨著城市化的不斷發(fā)展,以房屋為主的不動產(chǎn)越來越成為人們必不可少的生產(chǎn)生活資料,我國《物權(quán)法》對不動產(chǎn)的變動規(guī)定的是登記生效的原則,即物權(quán)變動的效力要靠登記來決定,因此不動產(chǎn)登記對不動產(chǎn)的變動產(chǎn)生了法律效力。這種登記生效的行為一方面對物權(quán)人的權(quán)利加以法律保護,但是問題也隨之產(chǎn)生了,不動產(chǎn)登記在理論界和實踐中都被認定是一種行政行為,而不動產(chǎn)的權(quán)屬爭議屬于民事糾紛。所以這種不動產(chǎn)登記行為涉及的糾紛不僅僅是行政爭議,而是行政爭議與民事糾紛的交叉行為,是兩種法律關(guān)系交叉的狀態(tài)。 這類的案件在不動產(chǎn)案件中占據(jù)了相當一部分比例,面對這類案件,我們是應該提起民事訴訟還是行政訴訟,是值得我們研究的問題,從合理有效解決矛盾,及時化解糾紛,節(jié)約司法資源,方便當事人的多個方面綜合考慮此類案件的解決方法,針對日益復雜的行政審判中交叉民事案件的糾紛,學界也對此類案件的審理提出了不同的意見,有的學者建議采用合并審理模式,有的學者則認為應該分開審理,綜合理論及實踐分析,建議采用合并審理的模式,并作出行政附帶民事判決。 本文主要通過對延邊州法院關(guān)于不動產(chǎn)登記民行交叉類的兩個案件審理模式的分析,在此基礎上,論證合并審理模式的可行性和合理性,支持合并審理模式。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous development of urbanization, the housing based real estate has become an indispensable means of production and livelihood. That is, the effect of real right change depends on registration, so real estate registration has legal effect on real estate change. On the one hand, this kind of registration takes effect, on the one hand, it protects the rights of the real right person, but the problem also arises. The registration of real estate is regarded as an administrative act in theory and practice. The ownership dispute of immovable property belongs to civil dispute. Therefore, this kind of real estate registration involves not only administrative disputes, but also administrative disputes and civil disputes. This kind of cases occupy a considerable proportion of the real estate cases. In the face of such cases, should we institute civil proceedings or administrative proceedings, is a problem worthy of our study, from a reasonable and effective solution to conflicts and to resolve disputes in a timely manner. Saving judicial resources and facilitating parties' comprehensive consideration of the solution of such cases. In view of the increasingly complex disputes in cross-civil cases in administrative trials, scholars have also put forward different opinions on the trial of such cases. Some scholars suggest that the mode of joint trial should be adopted, and some scholars think that the trial should be separated, and the theory and practice should be analyzed, and the mode of joint trial should be adopted, and the administrative incidental civil judgment should be made. Based on the analysis of two trial modes of real estate registration in Yanbian District Court, this paper demonstrates the feasibility and rationality of the combined trial mode and supports the joint-trial model.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1;D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李佳;;論民行交叉案件現(xiàn)行處理模式中存在的風險及其預防[J];法學雜志;2011年05期

2 苗久坤;;我國行政附帶民事訴訟制度之展望[J];法制與社會;2010年02期

3 葉飛;;不動產(chǎn)登記中的民行交叉問題[J];法制與社會;2011年32期

4 李佳;;民行交叉案件法律責任之法理分析[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2010年04期

5 楊威;賈亞強;;不動產(chǎn)登記案件中民行交叉問題的處理[J];天津市政法管理干部學院學報;2009年04期

6 黃勤武;;民事訴訟中對行政登記行為的效力審查[J];人民司法;2006年07期

7 趙江風;;物權(quán)法區(qū)分原則：房屋登記民行交叉案件的裁判路徑[J];山東審判;2012年04期

8 楊凱;;論房產(chǎn)糾紛行政與民事交叉案件之審理對策——兼評《物權(quán)法》實施對民事行政關(guān)聯(lián)訴訟審判之影響[J];行政法學研究;2008年01期

9 張，

本文編號：2178644