我國第三人撤銷之訴的完善研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-12 09:01
【摘要】：為了遏制司法實踐中的惡意訴訟現(xiàn)象、回應訴訟外第三人的權利救濟需求,我國《民事訴訟法》在2012年修改時吸收借鑒了域外立法經(jīng)驗,引入第三人撤銷之訴制度。但由于立法過程倉促、理論論證不足,我國第三人撤銷之訴凸顯出適格原告范圍存在缺陷、程序性質不明、具體適用程序缺失、與其他事后救濟程序關系尚未厘清的問題,致使應有的權利救濟功能難以得到充分有效地發(fā)揮。 本文在明確第三人撤銷之訴屬于特殊救濟程序的基礎上,主張其適用應當堅持訴權保障、訴訟效益原則。遵循這一指導原則,結合對域外立法的考察比較,對我國第三人撤銷之訴的完善予以探討。在適格原告方面,以相關主體與原訴訴訟標的、裁判結果有無法律上利害關系作為適格原告的判斷基準,擴大理解適格原告的范圍。在具體程序完善方面,明確了立案審查、具體審理程序、裁判效力等主要程序事項。在與相關程序的協(xié)調銜接方面,對于第三人撤銷之訴與其他第三人事后救濟程序的關系處理,認為應注重發(fā)揮第三人撤銷之訴的功能；同時,還需增設事前法院通知制度、參照適用相關制裁措施,以兼顧維護生效裁判的穩(wěn)定性。
[Abstract]:In order to curb the malevolent litigation phenomenon in judicial practice and respond to the right relief needs of the third party outside the lawsuit, our country's Civil procedure Law adopted the system of the third party's revocation in 2012 by absorbing the foreign legislative experience and introducing the system of the third party's revocation. However, due to the hasty legislative process and insufficient theoretical argumentation, the revocation of the third party in our country highlights the defects in the scope of the suitably qualified plaintiff, the unclear nature of the procedure, the lack of specific applicable procedures, and the unclarified relationship with other ex post relief procedures. As a result, it is difficult to give full play to the right relief function. On the basis of making clear that the third party's revocation is a special relief procedure, this paper argues that the application of the action should adhere to the principle of litigation right protection and litigation benefit. In accordance with this guiding principle and in combination with the investigation and comparison of the extraterritorial legislation, this paper probes into the perfection of the revocation of the third party in our country. In the aspect of suitably plaintiff, the relevant subject and the object of the original lawsuit, whether the judgment result has the legal interest as the judgment standard of the qualified plaintiff, expands the scope of understanding the suitably plaintiff. In the aspect of perfecting the concrete procedure, it clarifies the main procedural matters, such as filing examination, concrete trial procedure, adjudication effect and so on. In the aspect of coordination and convergence with related procedures, the relationship between the third party's revocation action and the other third party's ex post relief procedure should be dealt with, and the function of the third party's revocation should be brought into play; at the same time, the system of prior court notice should be added. Refer to the application of relevant sanctions in order to maintain the stability of the effective referee.
【學位授予單位】：廣西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2178581
[Abstract]:In order to curb the malevolent litigation phenomenon in judicial practice and respond to the right relief needs of the third party outside the lawsuit, our country's Civil procedure Law adopted the system of the third party's revocation in 2012 by absorbing the foreign legislative experience and introducing the system of the third party's revocation. However, due to the hasty legislative process and insufficient theoretical argumentation, the revocation of the third party in our country highlights the defects in the scope of the suitably qualified plaintiff, the unclear nature of the procedure, the lack of specific applicable procedures, and the unclarified relationship with other ex post relief procedures. As a result, it is difficult to give full play to the right relief function. On the basis of making clear that the third party's revocation is a special relief procedure, this paper argues that the application of the action should adhere to the principle of litigation right protection and litigation benefit. In accordance with this guiding principle and in combination with the investigation and comparison of the extraterritorial legislation, this paper probes into the perfection of the revocation of the third party in our country. In the aspect of suitably plaintiff, the relevant subject and the object of the original lawsuit, whether the judgment result has the legal interest as the judgment standard of the qualified plaintiff, expands the scope of understanding the suitably plaintiff. In the aspect of perfecting the concrete procedure, it clarifies the main procedural matters, such as filing examination, concrete trial procedure, adjudication effect and so on. In the aspect of coordination and convergence with related procedures, the relationship between the third party's revocation action and the other third party's ex post relief procedure should be dealt with, and the function of the third party's revocation should be brought into play; at the same time, the system of prior court notice should be added. Refer to the application of relevant sanctions in order to maintain the stability of the effective referee.
【學位授予單位】：廣西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 胡思博;;論雙階段型再審立案審查程序的構建——以對再審之訴的雙重審查為基礎[J];研究生法學;2011年05期
2 魏新璋;張軍斌;李燕山;;對“虛假訴訟”有關問題的調查與思考 以浙江法院防范和查處虛假訴訟的實踐為例[J];法律適用;2009年01期
3 劉學在;朱建敏;;案外人異議制度的廢棄與執(zhí)行異議之訴的構建——兼評修改后的《民事訴訟法》第204條[J];法學評論;2008年06期
4 傅賢國;;“第三人撤銷訴訟”抑或“訴訟第三人異議之訴”——基于我國《民訴法》第56條第3款的分析[J];法學評論;2013年05期
5 常怡,唐力;民事再審制度的理性分析[J];河北法學;2002年05期
6 張培;;重新詮釋有獨立請求權第三人[J];海南大學學報(人文社會科學版);2011年01期
7 宋漢林;;第三人撤銷訴訟立法的完善[J];理論探索;2013年02期
8 王飛鴻;趙晉山;;民事訴訟法執(zhí)行編修改的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2008年01期
9 崔玲玲;;第三人撤銷之訴的事由——與再審之訴的事由比較[J];社科縱橫;2011年09期
10 袁巍;孫付;;第三人撤銷之訴的法律適用與程序構建[J];山東審判;2013年01期
，本文編號：2178581
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2178581.html
