【摘要】：2016年年底,多年來(lái)備受關(guān)注的聶樹(shù)斌強(qiáng)奸及故意殺人案以最高人民法院第二巡回法庭宣告聶樹(shù)斌無(wú)罪而告平反昭雪。這是繼云南杜培武故意殺人案、湖北佘祥林故意殺人案、河南趙作海故意殺人案、浙江張高平及張輝叔侄故意殺人案、福建念斌投毒案、內(nèi)蒙古呼格吉勒?qǐng)D故意殺人案、海南陳滿故意殺人案等之后,又一起牽動(dòng)我國(guó)社會(huì)公眾的神經(jīng)與情感,在當(dāng)事人家屬反復(fù)不斷申冤、各界人士鼎力相助幾十年之后,終于迎來(lái)但的確遲到的那一縷司法正義的陽(yáng)光。自然地,每一樁冤案錯(cuò)案的平反昭雪,都會(huì)讓當(dāng)事人家屬稍感欣慰,對(duì)無(wú)端沉冤而消失的生命也有那么一點(diǎn)稍許的慰藉,同樣也都會(huì)讓社會(huì)公眾多多少少舒那么一口氣。但對(duì)于當(dāng)代中國(guó)的法律人而言,恐怕少許的欣慰實(shí)在無(wú)法緩解心中基于職業(yè)良知而背負(fù)的司法正義不到或者遲到的“罪孽”的沉重。因?yàn)槲覀冎?我們的社會(huì)可能至今都還有很多的冤案錯(cuò)案,正在排隊(duì)等候著見(jiàn)到司法正義曙光的那一刻;我們的社會(huì)今后依然可能還會(huì)產(chǎn)生各式各樣的冤案錯(cuò)案,從而讓正義蒙羞。與眾多得到平反或者未能得到平反的冤案錯(cuò)案一樣,聶樹(shù)斌案也好,呼格吉勒?qǐng)D案也好,無(wú)論其影響程度有多大、影響范圍有多廣,都終將歸于沉寂而成為歷史中的一個(gè)事件。但作為法律人,我們恐怕不應(yīng)該輕易忘記這些冤案錯(cuò)案,也不應(yīng)該隨意地越過(guò)這些冤案錯(cuò)案,尤其是在我國(guó)全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó),通過(guò)建設(shè)中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法治體系以努力建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家的時(shí)代背景下,我們更應(yīng)該通過(guò)對(duì)這些冤案錯(cuò)案的理性反思,來(lái)對(duì)我國(guó)的相關(guān)制度及其實(shí)踐以及對(duì)作為制度實(shí)踐的參與者的我們自身進(jìn)行深刻的反思和批判,以尋求即使不能杜絕也要盡可能減少冤案錯(cuò)案的發(fā)生,向習(xí)近平總書記提出的“努力讓人民群眾在每一個(gè)司法案件中都能感受到公平正義”的目標(biāo)不斷邁進(jìn)。為此,我們邀請(qǐng)了清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院周光權(quán)教授、中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院林維教授、吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院徐岱教授、沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院及法律與公共政策研究中心姚建宗教授,共同參與這次以“反思冤案錯(cuò)案”為主題的筆談。
[Abstract]:At the end of 2016, Nie Shubin's rapes and manslaughter cases, which have attracted much attention for many years, were acquitted by the second Circuit Court of the Supreme people's Court. This is a case of intentional homicide by du Peiwu in Yunnan Province, deliberate homicide in she Xianglin in Hubei Province, intentional homicide in Zhao Zuohai in Henan Province, intentional homicide in Zhejiang Zhang Gao Ping and Zhang Hui's nephew, poisoning in Nimin in Fujian Province, and intentional homicide in Huugjilt in Inner Mongolia. After the manslaughter case of Chen Man in Hainan, and so on, together with the nerves and feelings of the public in our country, after the family members of the parties repeatedly avenged their grievances and people from all walks of life helped each other for decades, Finally ushered in but was indeed late for that ray of justice sunshine. Naturally, the rehabilitation of every wrong case will make the family of the party a little gratified. There is also a little consolation for the life that has disappeared without cause, as well as more or less relief for the public. But for the legal people of contemporary China, I am afraid that a little relief can not alleviate the burden of judicial justice based on professional conscience or late "sin". Because we know that our society may still have a lot of wrongs and are waiting in line to see the dawn of judicial justice. Our society may still have all kinds of wrongs and wrongs in the future. And bring shame to justice. Like many wrongs that have been vindicated or have not been rehabilitated, Nie Shubin case and Huugjilt case, no matter how large their influence and how wide their scope of influence, will eventually fall silent and become an event in history. However, as legal personnel, I am afraid that we should not easily forget these wrongs, nor should we arbitrarily go beyond them, especially in promoting the rule of law in an all-round way in our country. Under the background of building a socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics in an effort to build a socialist country ruled by law, we should reflect on these wrong cases through rational reflection. To deeply reflect and criticize the relevant systems and practices of our country, as well as ourselves as participants in institutional practice, in order to seek to minimize the occurrence of wrongful cases even if they cannot be eliminated. President Xi Jinping's goal of "trying to make the people feel fair and just in every judicial case." To this end, we have invited Professor Zhou Guangquan, School of Law, Tsinghua University, Professor Lin Wei, China Youth School of Politics, Professor Xu Dai, School of Law of Jilin University, Professor Yao Jianzong, School of Law and Research Center of Law and Public Policy of Shenyang normal University, Joint participation in this "reflection on the wrong case of injustice" as the theme of the written conversation.
【作者單位】： 清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 張小讓;張彥民;;由道路交通意外轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楣室鈿⑷税?例[A];法醫(yī)臨床學(xué)專業(yè)理論與實(shí)踐——中國(guó)法醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)·全國(guó)第十六屆法醫(yī)臨床學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

2 劉寧生;邢庭;;是交通事故還是故意殺人[A];中國(guó)法醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)全國(guó)第十三次法醫(yī)臨床學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

3 黎軍;楊文滔;;死緩限制減刑制度的初步檢視——基于中級(jí)法院司法實(shí)踐的考察[A];建設(shè)公平正義社會(huì)與刑事法律適用問(wèn)題研究-全國(guó)法院第24屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募ㄏ聝?cè)）[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 易愛(ài)民　李春艷;故意殺人在逃嫌疑人相繼落網(wǎng)[N];人民公安報(bào);2011年

2 宋 翔 張?zhí)?“殺害被綁架人”不等于故意殺人行為[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

3 河南省平頂山市檢察院 王曉民;搶劫罪中暴力行為不宜包括故意殺人[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

4 朱明鎖;故意殺人后乘機(jī)掠財(cái)如何定性[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

5 李克杰;寶馬碾死男童,司機(jī)肯定是故意殺人嗎[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

6 本報(bào)通訊員 王鵬黑　武衛(wèi) 李慧澤;綏德警方48小時(shí)破獲故意殺人案[N];榆林日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

7 許銘君　代先鋒;虞城縣公安局追逃佳績(jī)獲省公安廳好評(píng)[N];商丘日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

8 沈軒;安醫(yī)大二附院故意殺人案快速偵破[N];安徽日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

9 本報(bào)記者 潘從武 本報(bào)通訊員 何濤;貌似礦井事故其實(shí)故意殺人[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

10 記者 余建華 孟煥良 通訊員 鄭國(guó)良;浙江高院再審陳建陽(yáng)等搶劫盜竊案 項(xiàng)生源故意殺人案在嘉興公開(kāi)庭審[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 謝夢(mèng);死緩限制減刑制度初探[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2014年

2 譚琰;我國(guó)十個(gè)故意殺人冤假錯(cuò)案的實(shí)證研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué);2015年

3 劉婕;因婚戀糾紛引發(fā)的殺人案件之死刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

4 楊培培;故意傷害致死與故意殺人界限的認(rèn)定[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2015年

5 杜虹良;我國(guó)故意殺人案死刑適用中存在的突出問(wèn)題及解決[D];湘潭大學(xué);2014年

6 周蘭;“民間糾紛”與故意殺人罪的死刑限制[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

7 張雨;吉某某故意殺人案評(píng)析[D];湖南大學(xué);2016年

8 王磊;田某某故意殺人案評(píng)析[D];湖南大學(xué);2016年

9 劉志加;民間糾紛引發(fā)的故意殺人案研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年

10 虞姿君;論謀殺與故意殺人的區(qū)分[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2176719