【摘要】：在政治新常態(tài)下,賄賂犯罪已然成為對(duì)我國(guó)政治環(huán)境影響最大的腐敗犯罪,但我國(guó)腐敗犯罪立法方面滯后嚴(yán)重,與國(guó)際反腐敗懲治機(jī)制接軌不暢,由于賄賂犯罪案件具有不同于普通刑事案件的特點(diǎn),其證據(jù)也相應(yīng)地具有特殊屬性,在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有證據(jù)制度下,賄賂犯罪偵破難、取證難、認(rèn)定難的問(wèn)題難以獲得實(shí)質(zhì)性破解。因此,本文擬在分析問(wèn)題癥結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒域外證據(jù)制度立法,結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際,提出建立完善有中國(guó)特色的賄賂犯罪證據(jù)制度的路徑構(gòu)想。本文除去引言和結(jié)語(yǔ),主體共計(jì)三大部分。各部分的梗概內(nèi)容分別為:第一部分賄賂犯罪案件的證據(jù)問(wèn)題分析。首先,從賄賂犯罪案件偵查面臨的挑戰(zhàn)入手,指出賄賂犯罪案件存在的立案難問(wèn)題。其次,通過(guò)與普通刑事案件的證據(jù)相比較,分析賄賂犯罪案件證據(jù)所特有的特征。最后,在前述分析基礎(chǔ)上,剖析賄賂案件在司法實(shí)踐中面臨的取證難、認(rèn)定難問(wèn)題。第二部分我國(guó)現(xiàn)行賄賂犯罪證據(jù)制度的現(xiàn)狀和缺陷。首先,分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)行證據(jù)制度的現(xiàn)狀,指出沒(méi)有專門(mén)賄賂犯罪證據(jù)立法的不足。其次,剖析我國(guó)現(xiàn)行證據(jù)制度在認(rèn)定賄賂犯罪中在證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)設(shè)定、證明責(zé)任分配方面存在的缺陷。第三部分完善賄賂犯罪證據(jù)制度的路徑設(shè)計(jì)。首先,從解決證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題入手,提出建立多層次的賄賂犯罪證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。其次著眼于合理分配證明責(zé)任和解決取證難、認(rèn)定難問(wèn)題,借鑒國(guó)際國(guó)外成熟經(jīng)驗(yàn),分別確立賄賂推定規(guī)則和引入污點(diǎn)證人作證豁免制度,對(duì)兩個(gè)規(guī)則、制度在打擊懲治賄賂犯罪方面的價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義進(jìn)行了分析論證,并就我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中,對(duì)賄賂推定原則的嚴(yán)格使用和對(duì)污點(diǎn)證人作證制度的有限適用進(jìn)行規(guī)制,以期構(gòu)建符合我國(guó)國(guó)情的賄賂犯罪證據(jù)制度。
[Abstract]:Under the new normal state of politics, bribery crime has become the most important corruption crime in our country. However, the legislation of corruption crime in our country lags behind seriously, and it is difficult to connect with the international anti-corruption punishment mechanism. Because the bribery crime case has the characteristic which is different from the ordinary criminal case, its evidence also has the special attribute correspondingly. Under the present evidence system of our country, the bribery crime detection difficulty, the evidence collection difficulty, the confirmation difficult question is difficult to obtain the substantive solution. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing the crux of the problem, this paper draws lessons from the legislation of the extraterritorial evidence system and combines the reality of our country, and puts forward the path of establishing and perfecting the evidence system of bribery crime with Chinese characteristics. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, there are three main parts in this paper. The main contents of each part are as follows: the first part is the analysis of evidence in bribery cases. First of all, starting with the challenge of bribery case investigation, the paper points out the problem of filing bribery crime case. Secondly, by comparing with the evidence of ordinary criminal cases, this paper analyzes the characteristics of evidence in bribery cases. Finally, on the basis of the above analysis, the paper analyzes the difficulty of obtaining evidence in the practice of bribery. The second part is the present situation and defect of the evidence system of bribery in our country. Firstly, it analyzes the present situation of evidence system in our country, and points out the deficiency of evidence legislation without special bribery crime. Secondly, it analyzes the defects of the current evidence system in establishing the standard of proof and distributing the burden of proof in the determination of bribery crime. The third part consummates the path design of bribery crime evidence system. First of all, starting from solving the problem of standard of proof, it puts forward the establishment of multi-level standard of proof of bribery crime. Secondly, with the aim of reasonably distributing the burden of proof and solving the problem of obtaining evidence, the author draws lessons from the mature experience of foreign countries, establishes the rules of presumption of bribery and introduces the exemption system of tainted witness. This paper analyzes and demonstrates the value and practical significance of the system in the fight against the crime of bribery, and regulates the strict use of the principle of presumption of bribery and the limited application of the system of testifying against tainted witnesses in our country's judicial practice. In order to construct the evidence system of bribery crime in accordance with the situation of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭新林;;腐敗犯罪刑事推定若干問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年03期

2 張文琴;;法律規(guī)制下的技術(shù)偵查措施研究[J];河北法學(xué);2015年03期

3 董桂武;;論行賄罪受賄罪互動(dòng)規(guī)制之完善——基于囚徒困境理論的思考[J];東方論壇;2014年03期

4 酈元婷;;新刑訴法下賄賂犯罪證據(jù)的收集和固定[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年02期

5 張?jiān)娢?;直接證據(jù)與間接證據(jù)在受賄案件中的運(yùn)用[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年27期

6 車代紅;;論受賄案件“一對(duì)一”證據(jù)的收集與認(rèn)定[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

7 何艷敏;;試論如何運(yùn)用證據(jù)公訴當(dāng)前受賄犯罪[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年31期

8 王成坤;張文娟;;對(duì)受賄案件當(dāng)事人翻供問(wèn)題的探討[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年04期

9 張明楷;;受賄罪中收受財(cái)物后及時(shí)退交的問(wèn)題分析[J];法學(xué);2012年04期

10 李文革;石榮春;譚明;;芻議商業(yè)賄賂犯罪證據(jù)的收集[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年34期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 劉艷梅;淺析賄賂犯罪認(rèn)定的證據(jù)問(wèn)題及思考[D];新疆大學(xué);2013年

2 程春輝;論我國(guó)受賄犯罪證據(jù)的認(rèn)定與審查[D];蘭州大學(xué);2012年

3 李興才;受賄罪的司法認(rèn)定[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

4 杜志輝;利用影響力受賄犯罪的偵查取證問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2173751