論訴訟時效中斷規(guī)則的適用
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-08 18:33
【摘要】：訴訟時效中斷制度作為一項各國民事立法不可或缺的重要法律制度,其核心價值在于督促債權(quán)人積極主張權(quán)利,維護(hù)穩(wěn)定的社會經(jīng)濟秩序。然而,就我國現(xiàn)行立法來說,關(guān)于訴訟時效中斷規(guī)則的內(nèi)容仍存在一些缺漏與矛盾之處,與實踐的脫節(jié)導(dǎo)致司法實務(wù)的客觀需求無法滿足。此外,學(xué)術(shù)界對訴訟時效中斷適用規(guī)則的諸多爭議問題也存在較多分歧。本文通過對大量訴訟時效中斷制度研究成果的梳理,結(jié)合對具體案例的分析與思考,以我國訴訟時效中斷的事由及其適用問題為主線進(jìn)行探究,同時對大陸法系國家與英美法系國家關(guān)于訴訟時效中斷問題的相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行對比借鑒,以期指出我國訴訟時效中斷規(guī)則適用中的問題,并對我國的訴訟時效中斷規(guī)則的適用提出完善建議。本文第一部分為訴訟時效中斷制度概述,闡述訴訟時效中斷制度的內(nèi)涵,分析訴訟時效中斷制度的基本特征,探求訴訟時效中斷制度的源流,并闡釋其制度存在的價值。本文第二部分為請求方式引起時效中斷的規(guī)則適用問題,就其適用的主體、客體、方式及意思表示的到達(dá)等具體問題展開研究。本文第三部分為起訴和承認(rèn)方式引起訴訟時效中斷的具體適用問題。就起訴而言,起訴的擴張解釋,起訴中斷訴訟時效的時間點,以及起訴后又撤訴、不予受理、駁回起訴情形下訴訟時效中斷的認(rèn)定等爭議問題的分析解決;就承認(rèn)而言,從含義、構(gòu)成要件和方式三個方面闡述承認(rèn)引起訴訟時效中斷的問題。本文第四部分,從我國訴訟時效中斷規(guī)則適用的現(xiàn)狀入手,分析其所具有濃厚的中國特色,并指出我國訴訟時效中斷適用的不足之處,并提出一些完善的對策,為更好的適用我國訴訟時效中斷規(guī)則提供支持。
[Abstract]:As an indispensable important legal system of civil legislation in various countries, the system of limitation interruption of action is an important legal system, whose core value lies in urging creditors to actively claim their rights and to maintain a stable social and economic order. However, as far as the current legislation of our country is concerned, there are still some deficiencies and contradictions in the content of the rule of interruption of limitation of action, and the disconnection with practice leads to the impersonal demand of judicial practice being unable to meet. In addition, there are many disputes in academic circles about the rules of limitation interruption. By combing the research results of a large number of limitation interruption system, combining with the analysis and thinking of specific cases, this paper probes into the cause of the limitation interruption and its application in our country. At the same time, it makes a comparison between the civil law countries and the common law countries about the interruption of the limitation of action, in order to point out the problems in the application of the rules of the interruption of the limitation of action in our country. And put forward the perfect suggestion to our country's limitation interruption rule application. The first part of this paper is an overview of the system of limitation interruption of action, expounds the connotation of the system of interruption of limitation of action, analyzes the basic characteristics of the system of interruption of limitation of action, probes into the origin of the system of interruption of limitation of action, and explains the value of its existence. The second part of this paper deals with the application of the rules of limitation interruption caused by the request mode, and studies the specific problems such as the subject, the object, the way and the arrival of the expression of intention. The third part is about the specific application of the limitation interruption caused by the mode of prosecution and recognition. As far as the prosecution is concerned, the expanded interpretation of the prosecution, the time point at which the limitation of action is interrupted, the withdrawal of the suit after the prosecution, the inadmissibility of the action, the determination of the interruption of the statute of limitations in the case of dismissal of the prosecution, etc., are analyzed and resolved; as far as recognition is concerned, This paper expounds the problems of the interruption of limitation of action caused by recognition from three aspects of meaning, constitution and mode. The fourth part of this paper, starting with the current situation of the application of the limitation interruption rule in our country, analyzes its strong Chinese characteristics, points out the deficiencies of the limitation interruption application in our country, and puts forward some perfect countermeasures. To provide support for the better application of the statute of limitations interruption of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2172658
[Abstract]:As an indispensable important legal system of civil legislation in various countries, the system of limitation interruption of action is an important legal system, whose core value lies in urging creditors to actively claim their rights and to maintain a stable social and economic order. However, as far as the current legislation of our country is concerned, there are still some deficiencies and contradictions in the content of the rule of interruption of limitation of action, and the disconnection with practice leads to the impersonal demand of judicial practice being unable to meet. In addition, there are many disputes in academic circles about the rules of limitation interruption. By combing the research results of a large number of limitation interruption system, combining with the analysis and thinking of specific cases, this paper probes into the cause of the limitation interruption and its application in our country. At the same time, it makes a comparison between the civil law countries and the common law countries about the interruption of the limitation of action, in order to point out the problems in the application of the rules of the interruption of the limitation of action in our country. And put forward the perfect suggestion to our country's limitation interruption rule application. The first part of this paper is an overview of the system of limitation interruption of action, expounds the connotation of the system of interruption of limitation of action, analyzes the basic characteristics of the system of interruption of limitation of action, probes into the origin of the system of interruption of limitation of action, and explains the value of its existence. The second part of this paper deals with the application of the rules of limitation interruption caused by the request mode, and studies the specific problems such as the subject, the object, the way and the arrival of the expression of intention. The third part is about the specific application of the limitation interruption caused by the mode of prosecution and recognition. As far as the prosecution is concerned, the expanded interpretation of the prosecution, the time point at which the limitation of action is interrupted, the withdrawal of the suit after the prosecution, the inadmissibility of the action, the determination of the interruption of the statute of limitations in the case of dismissal of the prosecution, etc., are analyzed and resolved; as far as recognition is concerned, This paper expounds the problems of the interruption of limitation of action caused by recognition from three aspects of meaning, constitution and mode. The fourth part of this paper, starting with the current situation of the application of the limitation interruption rule in our country, analyzes its strong Chinese characteristics, points out the deficiencies of the limitation interruption application in our country, and puts forward some perfect countermeasures. To provide support for the better application of the statute of limitations interruption of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 曹志勛;;起訴中斷訴訟時效規(guī)則的理論展開[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2014年06期
2 霍海紅;;撤訴的訴訟時效后果[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2014年05期
3 尹田;;我國訴訟時效之立法模式評價[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期
4 王軼;;訴訟時效制度三論[J];法律適用;2008年11期
5 韓松;焦和平;;對我國《民法通則》關(guān)于起訴引起訴訟時效中斷規(guī)定的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2006年05期
6 戚兆岳;論訴訟時效中斷事由[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(法學(xué)版);2005年05期
7 董翠香;中日民法消滅時效制度比較[J];山東社會科學(xué);2005年07期
8 馮愷;論訴訟時效的不完成[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年01期
9 劉貴祥;訴訟時效若干理論與實務(wù)問題研究[J];法律適用;2004年02期
10 李建華,楊代雄,趙軍;論我國物權(quán)請求權(quán)訴訟時效制度的立法選擇——兼評《中華人民共和國民法(草案)》的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J];法學(xué)評論;2003年05期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條
1 吳慶寶;;訴訟時效中斷的司法認(rèn)定(上)[N];人民法院報;2009年
2 李永鋒;;引起訴訟時效中斷的承認(rèn)的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[N];人民法院報;2007年
，本文編號：2172658
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2172658.html
