虛假訴訟案件現(xiàn)狀分析及識別應(yīng)對機(jī)制構(gòu)建
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-08 11:23
【摘要】：當(dāng)今社會，越來越多的人將訴訟選作權(quán)益的有效救濟(jì)方式，近年來，案件數(shù)量逐年遞增，2010年我市各級法院受理案件近40萬件1。為了滿足社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期的司法需求，各地法院紛紛推出了構(gòu)建“大調(diào)解”格局的系列舉措，并將“調(diào)解優(yōu)先、調(diào)判結(jié)合”作為矛盾的化解路徑。而虛假訴訟恰恰利用調(diào)解優(yōu)先的程序性優(yōu)勢及當(dāng)事人處分的自主性權(quán)利，從嶄露頭角到大行其道，給現(xiàn)行的矛盾化解路徑造成了嚴(yán)重的侵襲。為此，理論界和實務(wù)界也對虛假訴訟給予了高度關(guān)注2，但尚無一套完整的程序體系。本文以2006—2010年我市一中轄區(qū)進(jìn)入審監(jiān)程序的虛假訴訟案件為樣本，在對其進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上，本著易于操作的原則，立足于現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定和法院審判權(quán)的可涵攝范圍，從對虛假訴訟進(jìn)行識別與規(guī)制的角度嘗試構(gòu)建識別機(jī)制及應(yīng)對機(jī)制，以增強(qiáng)“調(diào)解優(yōu)先、調(diào)判結(jié)合”這一矛盾化解路徑的風(fēng)險防范能力，真正發(fā)揮其在矛盾化解方面的優(yōu)勢。 本文除引言外，，共分為四個部分： 第一部分，虛假訴訟概述。在該部分，本文就虛假訴訟的虛假訴訟的內(nèi)涵、特征及分類等一般性問題進(jìn)行簡要分析，為下文的論證作好理論鋪墊。 第二部分，問題的凸顯即虛假訴訟案件的基本現(xiàn)狀。在該部分，分析虛假訴訟的案件走勢、常見類型及形成原因。 第三部分，問題的剖析即對虛假訴訟案件的分析。在該部分，分析現(xiàn)行矛盾化解路徑的天然優(yōu)勢、虛假訴訟對現(xiàn)行矛盾化解的沖擊表現(xiàn)及造成沖擊的原因。 第四部分，問題的防治即構(gòu)建虛假訴訟的識別及應(yīng)對機(jī)制。在該部分，從對虛假訴訟進(jìn)行事前預(yù)防的角度嘗試構(gòu)建“預(yù)警—會商—審查”的識別機(jī)制，從對虛假訴訟進(jìn)行事后規(guī)制的角度嘗試構(gòu)建“加強(qiáng)聯(lián)動—上浮成本—嚴(yán)格責(zé)任”的應(yīng)對機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, more and more people choose litigation as an effective remedy for their rights and interests. In recent years, the number of cases has increased year by year. In 2010, nearly 400000 cases were accepted by courts at all levels in our city. In order to meet the judicial needs in the period of social transformation, local courts have put forward a series of measures to construct the pattern of "Great Mediation", and take "Mediation first, and the combination of Adjustment and judgment" as the way to resolve the contradiction. But the false litigation has made use of the procedural advantage of mediation priority and the autonomous right of the parties to dispose of it, which has caused serious invasion to the existing ways of resolving contradictions. Therefore, the theoretical and practical circles also pay great attention to false litigation, but there is no complete procedural system. Based on the analysis of the false litigation cases in the jurisdiction of a middle school in our city from 2006 to 2010, this paper, based on the principle of ease of operation, is based on the existing legal provisions and the scope of the court jurisdiction. From the angle of identifying and regulating false litigation, this paper tries to construct the identification mechanism and the coping mechanism, in order to strengthen the risk prevention ability of the way to resolve the contradiction, which is "mediation first, combination of mediation and judgment", and to give full play to its advantages in resolving contradictions. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into four parts: the first part, an overview of false litigation. In this part, the author makes a brief analysis of the connotation, characteristics and classification of false litigation, which lays the foundation for the following argumentation. The second part, the highlight of the problem is the basic status of false litigation cases. In this part, the trend, common types and causes of false litigation are analyzed. The third part, the analysis of the problem is the analysis of false litigation cases. In this part, the author analyzes the natural advantages of the current conflict resolution path, the impact of false litigation on the current conflict resolution and the causes of the impact. The fourth part, the prevention and cure of the problem namely constructs the false lawsuit the identification and the response mechanism. In this part, we try to construct the identification mechanism of "early-warning, consultation and review" from the perspective of prevention of false litigation in advance. This paper attempts to construct the mechanism of "strengthening linkage-floating cost-strict liability" from the point of view of the ex post regulation of false litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2171637
[Abstract]:Nowadays, more and more people choose litigation as an effective remedy for their rights and interests. In recent years, the number of cases has increased year by year. In 2010, nearly 400000 cases were accepted by courts at all levels in our city. In order to meet the judicial needs in the period of social transformation, local courts have put forward a series of measures to construct the pattern of "Great Mediation", and take "Mediation first, and the combination of Adjustment and judgment" as the way to resolve the contradiction. But the false litigation has made use of the procedural advantage of mediation priority and the autonomous right of the parties to dispose of it, which has caused serious invasion to the existing ways of resolving contradictions. Therefore, the theoretical and practical circles also pay great attention to false litigation, but there is no complete procedural system. Based on the analysis of the false litigation cases in the jurisdiction of a middle school in our city from 2006 to 2010, this paper, based on the principle of ease of operation, is based on the existing legal provisions and the scope of the court jurisdiction. From the angle of identifying and regulating false litigation, this paper tries to construct the identification mechanism and the coping mechanism, in order to strengthen the risk prevention ability of the way to resolve the contradiction, which is "mediation first, combination of mediation and judgment", and to give full play to its advantages in resolving contradictions. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into four parts: the first part, an overview of false litigation. In this part, the author makes a brief analysis of the connotation, characteristics and classification of false litigation, which lays the foundation for the following argumentation. The second part, the highlight of the problem is the basic status of false litigation cases. In this part, the trend, common types and causes of false litigation are analyzed. The third part, the analysis of the problem is the analysis of false litigation cases. In this part, the author analyzes the natural advantages of the current conflict resolution path, the impact of false litigation on the current conflict resolution and the causes of the impact. The fourth part, the prevention and cure of the problem namely constructs the false lawsuit the identification and the response mechanism. In this part, we try to construct the identification mechanism of "early-warning, consultation and review" from the perspective of prevention of false litigation in advance. This paper attempts to construct the mechanism of "strengthening linkage-floating cost-strict liability" from the point of view of the ex post regulation of false litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 魏新璋;張軍斌;李燕山;;對“虛假訴訟”有關(guān)問題的調(diào)查與思考 以浙江法院防范和查處虛假訴訟的實踐為例[J];法律適用;2009年01期
2 汪建成,孫遠(yuǎn);論司法的權(quán)威與權(quán)威的司法[J];法學(xué)評論;2001年04期
3 張勝先,伍浩鵬;“惡意訴訟”的社會危害性及對策[J];河北法學(xué);2002年05期
4 劉爍玲;;論虛假訴訟及其治理[J];江西社會科學(xué);2010年02期
5 梁婷;;民事虛假訴訟現(xiàn)狀及其規(guī)制[J];黔南民族師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年01期
6 柳忠衛(wèi),石磊;訴訟欺詐行為研究——以刑法為視角的分析[J];山東公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2003年05期
7 吳玉萍;;訴訟欺詐行為定性研究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2005年04期
本文編號：2171637
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2171637.html
最近更新
教材專著
