論我國民事執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度及完善
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-02 17:14
【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行程序，是指人民法院的執(zhí)行組織，依照法定的程序，行使司法執(zhí)行權(quán)，強制義務(wù)人履行已經(jīng)發(fā)生法律效力的人民法院的判決、裁定或其他法律文書所確定的義務(wù)的活動。民事執(zhí)行程序是民事訴訟過程中的重要組成部分，其設(shè)立的目的是為了確保法院的生效裁判文書的一致性，當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益得以實現(xiàn)，國家的法律權(quán)威和尊嚴(yán)得以彰顯�？梢哉f民事執(zhí)行程序是維護申請執(zhí)行人權(quán)利的最后“堡壘”，是使生效法律文書確定的內(nèi)容得以實現(xiàn)的關(guān)鍵途徑，它不僅關(guān)系到個案中對申請執(zhí)行人權(quán)利的保護，也關(guān)系到整個法律體系中法律威嚴(yán)與信仰的樹立。 而在現(xiàn)實司法實踐中，“被執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)難尋”已成為困擾執(zhí)行工作的桎梏之一，由此造成了大量執(zhí)行案件不得不中止或終結(jié)執(zhí)行，極大地破壞了國家法律的權(quán)威性，損害了申請執(zhí)行人的合法權(quán)益。固然，執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)難以發(fā)現(xiàn)是由各方面因素的合力形成的，但是目前立法體系的不完善是一大原因。本文擬從“被執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)難尋”的角度出發(fā)，通過對民事執(zhí)行中的財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度進行理論和實踐探析，結(jié)合我國立法及司法實務(wù)現(xiàn)狀，，借鑒、比較域外執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)調(diào)查制度，以此探究我國民事執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)調(diào)查制度的優(yōu)勢和存在的不足，并進一步設(shè)計和構(gòu)建，以期完善中國的財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度，有利于民事強制執(zhí)行全局的規(guī)范運行。 本文由引言、正文和結(jié)語三大部分組成，其中正文分為四個部分。 第一部分是對民事執(zhí)行中的財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度整體的概述。該部分首先對民事執(zhí)行中的財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)的概念、內(nèi)容、理論基礎(chǔ)、發(fā)展歷程、在民事執(zhí)行程序中的地位和作用進行了論述和分析。其次分析了財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)主體、財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)客體以及財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)程序方面的理論問題。 第二部分是對我國民事執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度的立法現(xiàn)狀進行評析。首先羅列、整理了中國對民事執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度的立法規(guī)定，我國沒有統(tǒng)一的強制執(zhí)行法，對民事執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)調(diào)查制度的規(guī)定散見于《民事訴訟法》和眾多司法解釋、法規(guī)條文中。然后從法律規(guī)定的我國執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)調(diào)查的主要途徑：執(zhí)行機構(gòu)、申請執(zhí)行人、被執(zhí)行人、協(xié)助執(zhí)行等方面對立法現(xiàn)狀進行分析。 第三部分是對域外民事執(zhí)行中的財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度的比較研究。首先對典型的國家、地區(qū)富有特色的制度進行考察和借鑒。其次對域外國家的制度進行綜合評述和比較分析，以探尋適合我國的改革路徑。 第四部分是對我國民事執(zhí)行中財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度構(gòu)建的建議。通過執(zhí)行機關(guān)依職權(quán)調(diào)查、申請執(zhí)行人提供財產(chǎn)線索、被執(zhí)行人財產(chǎn)申報制度、社會協(xié)助執(zhí)行體系四個方面進行論述，對我國現(xiàn)行司法執(zhí)行的立法制度和法律策略方面對財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)的具體制度提出完善建議，為有效解決我國債務(wù)類案件司法執(zhí)行難的問題提供實用的法理基礎(chǔ)，以期我國的民事執(zhí)行財產(chǎn)發(fā)現(xiàn)制度能充分地在民事執(zhí)行中發(fā)揮積極價值。
[Abstract]:The civil execution procedure means that the enforcement organization of the people's court, in accordance with the legal procedures, exercises the judicial enforcement power to compel the obligor to perform the judgment of the people's court which has already had legal effect, The activity of an obligation established by a ruling or other legal instrument. Civil execution procedure is an important part in the process of civil litigation. Its purpose is to ensure the consistency of the effective judgment documents of the court, the realization of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, and the legal authority and dignity of the state. It can be said that civil execution procedure is the last "fortress" to safeguard the right of the application executor, and it is the key way to realize the content determined by the effective legal document. It is not only related to the protection of the right of the application executor in the case. It is also related to the establishment of law majesty and belief in the whole legal system. However, in the actual judicial practice, "being executed property is difficult to find" has become one of the shackles that perplexed the execution work, which caused a large number of execution cases to be suspended or ended, which greatly damaged the authority of the national law. Damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant executor. Although the executive property is difficult to find out by the combined forces of various factors, the imperfect legislative system is a major reason. Based on the theory and practice of the property discovery system in civil execution, this paper, from the point of view of "being executed property is difficult to find", compares the property survey system implemented abroad by combining with the present situation of legislation and judicial practice in our country. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of the property investigation system of civil enforcement in China, and further designs and constructs it in order to perfect the system of property discovery in China, which is conducive to the standardized operation of the overall situation of civil enforcement. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the system of property discovery in civil execution. This part firstly discusses and analyzes the concept, content, theoretical basis, development course, position and function of property discovery in civil execution procedure. Secondly, it analyzes the theoretical problems in the subject of property discovery, the object of property discovery and the procedure of property discovery. The second part is the analysis of the current legislation of the civil execution of property discovery system in China. First of all, it lists and collates the legislative provisions of China's civil enforcement property discovery system. There is no uniform enforcement law in China, and the provisions on the civil execution property investigation system are scattered in the Civil procedure Law and numerous judicial interpretations. In the text of a statute. Then it analyzes the current situation of the legislation from the following aspects: the enforcement agency, the application executor, the assistant enforcement and so on, which are the main ways to carry out the property investigation in our country as stipulated by law. The third part is the comparative study of the property discovery system in the foreign civil enforcement. First of all, the typical countries and regions full of characteristics of the system of inspection and reference. Secondly, it makes a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of the system of foreign countries in order to explore the reform path suitable for our country. The fourth part is to our country civil execution property discovery system construction suggestion. Through the investigation of the executive organ according to its authority, the application for the executor to provide the clue of property, the property declaration system of the person subjected to execution, and the social assistance implementation system are discussed in four aspects. On the aspect of legislation system and legal strategy of current judicial execution in our country, the author puts forward some perfect suggestions on the specific system of property discovery, which provides a practical legal basis for effectively solving the problem of difficult judicial execution of debt cases in China. It is hoped that the discovery system of civil execution property in our country can give full play to the positive value in civil execution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2160124
[Abstract]:The civil execution procedure means that the enforcement organization of the people's court, in accordance with the legal procedures, exercises the judicial enforcement power to compel the obligor to perform the judgment of the people's court which has already had legal effect, The activity of an obligation established by a ruling or other legal instrument. Civil execution procedure is an important part in the process of civil litigation. Its purpose is to ensure the consistency of the effective judgment documents of the court, the realization of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, and the legal authority and dignity of the state. It can be said that civil execution procedure is the last "fortress" to safeguard the right of the application executor, and it is the key way to realize the content determined by the effective legal document. It is not only related to the protection of the right of the application executor in the case. It is also related to the establishment of law majesty and belief in the whole legal system. However, in the actual judicial practice, "being executed property is difficult to find" has become one of the shackles that perplexed the execution work, which caused a large number of execution cases to be suspended or ended, which greatly damaged the authority of the national law. Damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant executor. Although the executive property is difficult to find out by the combined forces of various factors, the imperfect legislative system is a major reason. Based on the theory and practice of the property discovery system in civil execution, this paper, from the point of view of "being executed property is difficult to find", compares the property survey system implemented abroad by combining with the present situation of legislation and judicial practice in our country. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of the property investigation system of civil enforcement in China, and further designs and constructs it in order to perfect the system of property discovery in China, which is conducive to the standardized operation of the overall situation of civil enforcement. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the system of property discovery in civil execution. This part firstly discusses and analyzes the concept, content, theoretical basis, development course, position and function of property discovery in civil execution procedure. Secondly, it analyzes the theoretical problems in the subject of property discovery, the object of property discovery and the procedure of property discovery. The second part is the analysis of the current legislation of the civil execution of property discovery system in China. First of all, it lists and collates the legislative provisions of China's civil enforcement property discovery system. There is no uniform enforcement law in China, and the provisions on the civil execution property investigation system are scattered in the Civil procedure Law and numerous judicial interpretations. In the text of a statute. Then it analyzes the current situation of the legislation from the following aspects: the enforcement agency, the application executor, the assistant enforcement and so on, which are the main ways to carry out the property investigation in our country as stipulated by law. The third part is the comparative study of the property discovery system in the foreign civil enforcement. First of all, the typical countries and regions full of characteristics of the system of inspection and reference. Secondly, it makes a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of the system of foreign countries in order to explore the reform path suitable for our country. The fourth part is to our country civil execution property discovery system construction suggestion. Through the investigation of the executive organ according to its authority, the application for the executor to provide the clue of property, the property declaration system of the person subjected to execution, and the social assistance implementation system are discussed in four aspects. On the aspect of legislation system and legal strategy of current judicial execution in our country, the author puts forward some perfect suggestions on the specific system of property discovery, which provides a practical legal basis for effectively solving the problem of difficult judicial execution of debt cases in China. It is hoped that the discovery system of civil execution property in our country can give full play to the positive value in civil execution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 劉 健;德國民事強制執(zhí)行法律制度淺窺[J];中國司法;2002年05期
2 張紹忠;;21世紀(jì)初日本民事執(zhí)行制度改革述評——以2003～2004年的法律修訂為中心[J];日本學(xué)刊;2011年03期
3 楊柳;;德國財產(chǎn)釋明制度對應(yīng)下的我國強制債務(wù)人財產(chǎn)申報制度[J];社會科學(xué)輯刊;2012年01期
4 劉福泉;;韓國民事執(zhí)行威懾機制及其啟示[J];唐都學(xué)刊;2011年03期
5 亓榮霞;從執(zhí)行改革看人身執(zhí)行標(biāo)的的拓展[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年01期
本文編號：2160124
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2160124.html
