【摘要】：2002年《最高人民法院關(guān)于行政訴訟證據(jù)若干問題的規(guī)定》頒布施行,第65條被認為是自認在行政訴訟中的擴張適用,但從自認基礎(chǔ)理論與內(nèi)涵分析,該規(guī)定中的自認與通說有所差別,且規(guī)定略顯簡單、粗糙,可操作性不強。因此,宜將自認以三大訴訟類型為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)予以細化,排除直接影響公共利益及依法行政案件中適用自認,從而完善我國行政訴訟自認制度。
[Abstract]:In 2002, the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the evidence of Administrative Litigation were promulgated and implemented. Article 65 is considered to be the expansion and application of self-admission in administrative litigation, but the basic theory and connotation of self-admission are analyzed. There are some differences between self-admission and general theory in this regulation, and the stipulation is a little simple, rough and not operable. Therefore, it is advisable to refine self-admission according to the three types of litigation, to exclude the direct influence on public interest and the application of self-admission in administrative cases according to law, so as to perfect the system of self-admission in administrative litigation in our country.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D925.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張子偉;;論公共利益的界定[J];中國水運(下半月);2012年10期

2 張曉萍;;論公益訴訟的價值[J];中國集體經(jīng)濟;2010年27期

3 劉志禎;建立民眾訴訟,保護公共利益[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年S1期

4 蔣飛;;情況判決的基礎(chǔ)與邊界[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2013年05期

，

本文編號：2147593