【摘要】：2012年修訂的《刑事訴訟法》在第五編特別程序第四章中增設(shè)了“依法不負刑事責任的精神病人的強制醫(yī)療程序”,從適用對象、決定主體、審理程序、監(jiān)督機制等多方面對刑事強制醫(yī)療程序作出了明確規(guī)定,首次將精神病人強制醫(yī)療納入到刑事訴訟的領(lǐng)域。作為一項新生的刑事訴訟制度,刑事強制醫(yī)療程序充分體現(xiàn)了社會防衛(wèi)、人權(quán)保障、醫(yī)療救助、程序公正等價值訴求,對有效解決我國強制醫(yī)療方面存在的諸多問題有著深刻而重要的意義。但是,在肯定刑事強制醫(yī)療程序立法進步的同時,我們也發(fā)現(xiàn)了立法上的不足,這些具體問題主要體現(xiàn)在：行政化色彩依然存在；程序正當性明顯不足；司法精神醫(yī)學鑒定混亂：檢察監(jiān)督規(guī)定過于抽象等。 縱觀國外兩大法系國家的立法例,不同法系、不同國情的國家在刑事強制醫(yī)療程序的規(guī)定上雖存在差異,但在具體構(gòu)建上又有著諸多相似之外,對我國刑事強制醫(yī)療程序的完善具有積極的借鑒意義。本文借鑒域外的先進立法例,在符合我國語境的前提下,針對我國立法存在的不足,提出了一些具體設(shè)想：在適用對象上,將限制刑事責任能力的精神障礙者、無受審能力的精神病人、服刑期間患精神病的人納入到強制醫(yī)療程序中；在適用程序上,明確被申請人出庭、指定律師全程參與、被害人參與、實行不公開審理、可以缺席審判、賦予當事人上訴、檢察院抗訴權(quán)利等制度；在司法鑒定程序上,要求鑒定人原則上應(yīng)當出庭作證,合理設(shè)置鑒定啟動主體,引入專家輔助人制度；在檢察監(jiān)督上,完善檢察機關(guān)對人民法院、公安機關(guān)以及強制執(zhí)行機構(gòu)的檢察監(jiān)督。
[Abstract]:The Criminal procedure Law, as amended in 2012, has added "compulsory medical procedures for mental patients who are not criminally responsible according to law" in chapter IV of part 5 special procedures, which determines the subject and the trial procedure from the applicable object, The supervision mechanism and so on have made the explicit stipulation to the criminal compulsory medical procedure for the first time to the mental patient compulsory medical treatment into the criminal procedure domain. As a new criminal litigation system, the compulsory medical procedure of criminal law fully embodies the value demands of social defense, human rights protection, medical assistance, procedural justice, etc. It is of great significance to solve the problems of compulsory medical treatment in China. However, while affirming the legislative progress of the criminal compulsory medical procedure, we have also found the deficiencies in the legislation. These specific problems are mainly reflected in: the administrative color still exists; the procedure legitimacy is obviously insufficient; Forensic psychiatry appraisal confusion: the procuratorial supervision regulation is too abstract and so on. Looking at the legislative examples of the two major legal system countries abroad, although there are differences in the provisions of the criminal compulsory medical procedure in the countries with different legal systems and different national conditions, there are many similarities in the concrete construction. It has positive reference significance for the perfection of compulsory medical procedure in our country. This article draws lessons from the overseas advanced legislation example, in conformity with our country context premise, in view of our country legislation existence insufficiency, has put forward some concrete ideas: in the applicable object, will limit the criminal responsibility ability spiritual obstacle person, Mentally ill patients who have no capacity to stand trial, persons suffering from mental illness while serving their sentences are included in the compulsory medical procedures; in the applicable procedures, it is clear that the respondent will appear before the court, appoint a lawyer to participate in the whole process, and the victim will participate in the proceedings in private. It can be tried by default, endow the parties with appeal and procuratorate's right to protest; in the judicial appraisal procedure, the expert should appear in court to testify in principle, set up the main body of the appraisal startup reasonably, and introduce the system of expert assistant. In terms of procuratorial supervision, we should improve procuratorial supervision of people's courts, public security organs and enforcement agencies.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭志鋒;論我國強制醫(yī)療制度之完善[J];安陽工學院學報;2005年01期

2 王偉;精神病人強制醫(yī)療制度研究[J];法律與醫(yī)學雜志;2003年03期

3 時延安;;中美精神病人強制醫(yī)療制度之比較[J];法學評論;2009年04期

4 李娜玲;;刑事強制醫(yī)療程序適用對象之研究[J];法學雜志;2012年10期

5 倪潤;;強制醫(yī)療程序中“社會危險性”評價機制之細化[J];法學;2012年11期

6 朱晉峰;宮雪;;強制醫(yī)療程序的訴訟化建構(gòu)——基于強制醫(yī)療程序行政化色彩的分析[J];證據(jù)科學;2013年02期

7 沈曉吟;;淺論對強制醫(yī)療程序的檢察監(jiān)督[J];法制與社會;2013年22期

8 任麗紅;;淺談我國的刑事強制醫(yī)療程序[J];法制與社會;2013年25期

9 程世禮;評羅爾斯的正義論[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);2002年05期

10 毛中明;;精神病人送治權(quán)研究[J];南昌高專學報;2009年03期

，

本文編號：2145937