刑事庭審交叉詢問制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-23 16:22
【摘要】：交叉詢問是起源于英美法系的法庭調(diào)查程序。交叉詢問不僅作為刑事法庭證據(jù)調(diào)查程序的重要一環(huán),有利于挖掘案件事實,為判決結(jié)果提供可靠基礎(chǔ)；同時,其所蘊含的尊重人權(quán)、程序正義的價值,也為社會公眾認可裁判結(jié)果、增加裁判的可接受性奠定了基礎(chǔ)。因此,庭審交叉詢問制度不僅僅適用于英美法系國家,而且被世界其他國家所認可、借鑒。然而,作為一項發(fā)達、復(fù)雜的對抗制下的庭審證據(jù)調(diào)查程序,交叉詢問在被其他國家引進的過程中困難重重。其中不僅有訴訟傳統(tǒng)、法治文化的掣肘,也有配套制度缺失導(dǎo)致的實施困境。本文即著眼于我國目前存在的庭審形式化、當(dāng)事人主體性地位較弱、司法公信力不足等問題,旨在通過改革刑事庭審交叉詢問制度突破我國當(dāng)下訴訟法治發(fā)展的瓶頸。盡管我國也存在改革刑事庭審交叉詢問制度的文化觀念、訴訟傳統(tǒng)等諸多束縛,但是筆者依然從我國刑事訴訟法的理論和實踐完善中看到了此項制度改革勝利的曙光。
[Abstract]:Cross-examination is a court investigation procedure originating in the common law system. Cross-examination not only serves as an important part of the criminal court evidence investigation process, but also contributes to the discovery of the facts of the case and provides a reliable basis for the outcome of the judgement; at the same time, it implies the value of respect for human rights and procedural justice, It also lays a foundation for the public to recognize the results and increase the acceptability of the referees. Therefore, the system of cross-examination is not only applicable to common law countries, but also recognized and used for reference by other countries in the world. However, as a developed, complex adversarial court evidence investigation procedure, cross-examination is difficult in the process of being introduced by other countries. There are not only litigation tradition, rule of law culture constraints, but also the implementation dilemma caused by lack of supporting system. This paper aims to break through the bottleneck of the current development of Chinese procedural law by reforming the system of cross-questioning of criminal trial, focusing on the problems of the formalization of the trial, the weak subjectivity of the parties, the lack of judicial credibility, and so on. Although there are many restraints such as the cultural concept of reforming the system of cross-questioning in criminal trial and the tradition of litigation in our country, the author still sees the dawn of victory in the reform of this system from the perfection of the theory and practice of the criminal procedure law of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
本文編號：2139959
[Abstract]:Cross-examination is a court investigation procedure originating in the common law system. Cross-examination not only serves as an important part of the criminal court evidence investigation process, but also contributes to the discovery of the facts of the case and provides a reliable basis for the outcome of the judgement; at the same time, it implies the value of respect for human rights and procedural justice, It also lays a foundation for the public to recognize the results and increase the acceptability of the referees. Therefore, the system of cross-examination is not only applicable to common law countries, but also recognized and used for reference by other countries in the world. However, as a developed, complex adversarial court evidence investigation procedure, cross-examination is difficult in the process of being introduced by other countries. There are not only litigation tradition, rule of law culture constraints, but also the implementation dilemma caused by lack of supporting system. This paper aims to break through the bottleneck of the current development of Chinese procedural law by reforming the system of cross-questioning of criminal trial, focusing on the problems of the formalization of the trial, the weak subjectivity of the parties, the lack of judicial credibility, and so on. Although there are many restraints such as the cultural concept of reforming the system of cross-questioning in criminal trial and the tradition of litigation in our country, the author still sees the dawn of victory in the reform of this system from the perfection of the theory and practice of the criminal procedure law of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 易延友;;“眼球?qū)ρ矍虻臋?quán)利”——對質(zhì)權(quán)制度比較研究[J];比較法研究;2010年01期
2 張建偉;;強制辯護:一項勢在必行的制度[J];中國司法;2010年02期
3 陸伯松;;交叉詢問制度的辯護價值及其在我國的借鑒分析[J];中國檢察官;2010年05期
4 熊秋紅;;刑事證人作證制度之反思——以對質(zhì)權(quán)為中心的分析[J];中國政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年05期
5 雷建昌,王涼,高晉中;法庭訊(詢)問方式比較研究[J];人民檢察;2005年05期
6 陳衛(wèi)東;王靜;;我國刑事庭審中交叉詢問規(guī)則之重構(gòu)[J];人民檢察;2007年22期
7 湯一介;略論儒學(xué)的和諧觀念[J];社會科學(xué)研究;1998年03期
8 劉保昌;中華和合文化生成論[J];社會科學(xué)研究;1998年03期
9 龍宗智;;我國刑事庭審中人證調(diào)查的幾個問題——以“交叉詢問”問題為中心[J];政法論壇;2008年05期
10 孫長永;當(dāng)事人主義刑事訴訟中的法庭調(diào)查程序評析[J];政治與法律;2003年03期
，本文編號：2139959
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2139959.html
