自媒體輿論對司法公正影響研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-21 15:26
【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展使得自媒體被普遍應(yīng)用和推廣,迅速發(fā)展成為信息傳播的主要力量。以微博為代表的自媒體在傳播主體、傳播途徑和傳播方式上都不同于傳統(tǒng)媒體,它的發(fā)展打破了傳統(tǒng)媒體對話語權(quán)的壟斷,使得普通民眾獲得了一個(gè)自由報(bào)道各類事件、發(fā)表各種評論的空間,并且迅速占領(lǐng)了大量的輿論陣地。自媒體輿論逐漸成為監(jiān)督司法審判的不可忽視的有利力量,其在與司法活動(dòng)的互動(dòng)過程中,發(fā)揮著對司法公正不容忽視的重要作用。然而,任何事物都具有兩面性,都具有優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),自媒體輿論也不例外。自媒體輿論不僅是一把雙刃劍,也是一股難以駕馭和控制的力量。自媒體輿論對司法案件的關(guān)注與熱議,既可能成為促進(jìn)民意與司法認(rèn)同的助推器,也可能成為侵害司法公正的隱患。自媒體輿論與司法審判對于案件的評判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)存在差異,并且隱含了包括對當(dāng)下司法不公現(xiàn)象的不滿、對政府官員作風(fēng)的不滿、對社會(huì)分配不均的不滿等社會(huì)情緒。同時(shí)部分網(wǎng)民的個(gè)人素質(zhì)參差不齊,非理性的言論漫天飛舞,再加上我國沒有對自媒體輿論進(jìn)行有效的規(guī)制措施,以及當(dāng)下司法所面臨的信任危機(jī),均加劇了司法審判與自媒體輿論之間沖突與矛盾的產(chǎn)生。藥家鑫案、許霆案、杭州飆車案、鄧玉嬌案等典型案件,均彰顯了自媒體輿論對法官判斷的作用力,乃至影響最終案件判決結(jié)果的強(qiáng)大力量。如果自媒體輿論對司法的監(jiān)督超出了合理尺度,勢必會(huì)對司法審判帶來壓力,對司法獨(dú)立帶來干擾,最終阻礙司法公正的實(shí)現(xiàn)。自媒體輿論與司法公正是既對立又統(tǒng)一的,本文試圖以我國司法實(shí)踐中具有重大影響和重要作用的18個(gè)司法案例為樣本,從多角度、全方位分析自媒體輿論與司法之間是如何進(jìn)行互動(dòng)的;并且通過種種分析,研究自媒體輿論對司法公正的兩面性的影響,進(jìn)一步分析自媒體輿論對司法公正的消極影響及其產(chǎn)生原因,從而為實(shí)現(xiàn)二者協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展提出合理化建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet technology, self-media has been widely used and popularized, and has become the main force of information dissemination. The self-media, represented by Weibo, is different from the traditional media in the subject of communication, the way of communication and the way of communication. Its development breaks the monopoly of the traditional media on the right to speak, and makes the ordinary people have a freedom to report all kinds of events. There was room for comments and a rapid occupation of a large number of positions of public opinion. Since the media public opinion has gradually become a favorable force to supervise judicial trial, it plays an important role in the process of interaction with judicial activities. However, everything has two sides, advantages and disadvantages, since the media opinion is no exception. Self-media opinion is not only a double-edged sword, but also a force that is difficult to control and control. Since the media concern and heated discussion on judicial cases, it may become a booster to promote public opinion and judicial identity, but also a hidden danger to infringe on judicial justice. Since there are differences between the media opinion and the judicial judgment on the judgment standard of the case, there are hidden social emotions, including dissatisfaction with the current unfair phenomenon of justice, dissatisfaction with the style of government officials, and dissatisfaction with the uneven distribution of the society. At the same time, the personal qualities of some Internet users are uneven, irrational remarks are flying all over the world, plus our country has not carried out effective regulation measures on self-media public opinion, as well as the current crisis of trust faced by the judiciary. Both intensify the conflict and contradiction between judicial trial and self-media public opinion. The case of Yao Jiaxin, the case of Xu Ting, the case of drag racing in Hangzhou, the case of Deng Yujiao, and other typical cases, all show the power of the media opinion to judge the judge, and even the powerful force that influences the final judgment result of the case. If the supervision of the judiciary by the media exceeds the reasonable standard, it will inevitably bring pressure to the judicial trial, interfere with the judicial independence, and finally hinder the realization of the judicial justice. Since the media opinion and judicial justice are both opposite and unified, this paper attempts to take 18 judicial cases which have great influence and important role in our judicial practice as samples, from various angles. Through all kinds of analysis, the author studies the influence of self-media public opinion on judicial justice. This paper further analyzes the negative influence of self-media public opinion on judicial justice and its causes, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for realizing the coordinated development of the two.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926
本文編號(hào)：2135961
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet technology, self-media has been widely used and popularized, and has become the main force of information dissemination. The self-media, represented by Weibo, is different from the traditional media in the subject of communication, the way of communication and the way of communication. Its development breaks the monopoly of the traditional media on the right to speak, and makes the ordinary people have a freedom to report all kinds of events. There was room for comments and a rapid occupation of a large number of positions of public opinion. Since the media public opinion has gradually become a favorable force to supervise judicial trial, it plays an important role in the process of interaction with judicial activities. However, everything has two sides, advantages and disadvantages, since the media opinion is no exception. Self-media opinion is not only a double-edged sword, but also a force that is difficult to control and control. Since the media concern and heated discussion on judicial cases, it may become a booster to promote public opinion and judicial identity, but also a hidden danger to infringe on judicial justice. Since there are differences between the media opinion and the judicial judgment on the judgment standard of the case, there are hidden social emotions, including dissatisfaction with the current unfair phenomenon of justice, dissatisfaction with the style of government officials, and dissatisfaction with the uneven distribution of the society. At the same time, the personal qualities of some Internet users are uneven, irrational remarks are flying all over the world, plus our country has not carried out effective regulation measures on self-media public opinion, as well as the current crisis of trust faced by the judiciary. Both intensify the conflict and contradiction between judicial trial and self-media public opinion. The case of Yao Jiaxin, the case of Xu Ting, the case of drag racing in Hangzhou, the case of Deng Yujiao, and other typical cases, all show the power of the media opinion to judge the judge, and even the powerful force that influences the final judgment result of the case. If the supervision of the judiciary by the media exceeds the reasonable standard, it will inevitably bring pressure to the judicial trial, interfere with the judicial independence, and finally hinder the realization of the judicial justice. Since the media opinion and judicial justice are both opposite and unified, this paper attempts to take 18 judicial cases which have great influence and important role in our judicial practice as samples, from various angles. Through all kinds of analysis, the author studies the influence of self-media public opinion on judicial justice. This paper further analyzes the negative influence of self-media public opinion on judicial justice and its causes, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions for realizing the coordinated development of the two.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張明楷;;言論自由與刑事犯罪[J];清華法學(xué);2016年01期
2 徐光華;;自媒體時(shí)代的刑事司法與民意[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2014年02期
3 李兵;展江;;“媒體審判”真?zhèn)伪鎇J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期
4 周永坤;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制立法評析[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期
5 周安平;;涉訴輿論的面相與本相:十大經(jīng)典案例分析[J];中國法學(xué);2013年01期
6 羅佳;;論自媒體時(shí)代政府話語權(quán)的危機(jī)與變革[J];求實(shí);2012年07期
7 彭艷軍;;“輿論審判”與司法獨(dú)立性[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期
8 徐陽;;“輿情再審”:司法決策的困境與出路[J];中國法學(xué);2012年02期
9 徐駿;;司法應(yīng)對網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論的理念與策略——基于18個(gè)典型案例的分析[J];法學(xué);2011年12期
10 孫健;徐祖迎;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論監(jiān)督及其規(guī)范[J];中國行政管理;2011年12期
，本文編號(hào)：2135961
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2135961.html
最近更新
教材專著
