本文選題：恢復(fù)性司法 + 適用范圍��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 論文首先對恢復(fù)性司法概念進(jìn)行了界定并闡述了恢復(fù)性司法的理論基礎(chǔ)�；謴�(fù)性司法又稱為修復(fù)性司法,二者皆譯自英文restorative justice。對于恢復(fù)性司法,目前沒有一個(gè)能夠?yàn)槿藗兤毡榻邮艿母拍睢；謴?fù)性司法可以追溯到二十世紀(jì)七十年代,為適應(yīng)刑罰輕緩化的趨勢和對被害人權(quán)利保障的關(guān)注,西方的法律改革者提出了恢復(fù)性司法理論,并在英、美、德等國的司法實(shí)踐中得到推廣應(yīng)用九十年代恢復(fù)性司法得到蓬勃的發(fā)展,聯(lián)合國等國際組織也制定了一系列決議以指導(dǎo)各國的恢復(fù)性司法制度建設(shè)。對恢復(fù)性司法的內(nèi)涵,理論上沒有統(tǒng)一的界定,但可以總結(jié)出其一般的特征、內(nèi)容和一般程序。我們應(yīng)清醒地認(rèn)識到在我國建立恢復(fù)性司法有很多觀念和制度上的障礙,同時(shí)也有著一些有利的因素。 研究恢復(fù)性司法適用范圍主要有以下幾方面的意義:為恢復(fù)性司法在中國的引進(jìn)提供保障;最大限度的保護(hù)當(dāng)事人利益;減少恢復(fù)性司法適用的阻力;避免制度設(shè)計(jì)上的極端化現(xiàn)象,防范可能產(chǎn)生的一些負(fù)面影響。接著說明恢復(fù)性司法適用范圍的界定原則以及制度的構(gòu)建的前提。主要從理論研究不足對適用的限制,中國社會層面對適用的限制,中國制度層面對適用的限制等三方面進(jìn)行了論述。然后提出在中國如何進(jìn)行恢復(fù)性司法的制度構(gòu)建。 本文著重界定了中國恢復(fù)性司法的適用范圍。一方面界定了原則上可以適用的案件主體和案件類型,另一方面界定了原則上不能適用的案件主體和案件類型。
[Abstract]:Firstly, the paper defines the concept of restorative justice and expounds the theoretical basis of restorative justice. Restorative justice is also called restorative justice, both of which are translated from English restorative justice. There is no universally accepted concept of restorative justice. Restorative justice can be traced back to the 1970s. In order to adapt to the trend of light punishment and concern about the protection of victims' rights, Western legal reformers put forward the theory of restorative justice in the United Kingdom and the United States. The judicial practice of Germany and other countries has been popularized and applied to restorative justice in the 1990s, and international organizations such as the United Nations have formulated a series of resolutions to guide the construction of restorative justice system in various countries. There is no unified definition of the connotation of restorative justice in theory, but its general characteristics, contents and general procedures can be summed up. We should soberly realize that there are many conceptual and institutional obstacles to the establishment of restorative justice in China, and at the same time, there are some favorable factors. Research on the scope of application of restorative justice has the following significance: to provide protection for the introduction of restorative justice in China, to protect the interests of the parties to the maximum extent, to reduce the resistance to the application of restorative justice; Avoid the extreme phenomenon in the system design and guard against some possible negative effects. Then it explains the defining principle of the scope of application of restorative justice and the premise of the construction of the system. This paper mainly discusses the limitations of application from the aspects of the lack of theoretical research, the limitation of application from the social level of China, and the limitation of application from the level of Chinese system. Then it puts forward how to construct the system of restorative justice in China. This paper focuses on defining the scope of application of restorative justice in China. On the one hand, it defines the subjects and types of cases that can be applied in principle, on the other hand, defines the subjects and types of cases that can not be applied in principle.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D925.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 周春玲;我國特殊刑事重罪追訴引入恢復(fù)性司法之探究[D];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

2 劉U，

本文編號：2118323