本文選題：刑事被害人 + 訴訟參與度　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事被害人作為犯罪活動(dòng)的直接受害者以及刑事訴訟活動(dòng)的參與主體之一,理應(yīng)受到全面的保護(hù)和公平的對(duì)待。但我國(guó)在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)于刑事被害人的保護(hù)卻飽受詬病,刑事被害人無(wú)法真正的參與到訴訟活動(dòng)中去、難以對(duì)于刑事訴訟活動(dòng)產(chǎn)生實(shí)質(zhì)性影響,最重要的是難以在刑事訴訟活動(dòng)中獲得足夠的物質(zhì)和精神賠償。為了解決這一問(wèn)題,在世界范圍內(nèi)被害人學(xué)研究熱潮的影響之下,部分國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者提出,應(yīng)當(dāng)在立法上賦予刑事被害人更加獨(dú)立的訴訟地位、更加廣泛和深層次的訴訟權(quán)利、以及更加完善的求償權(quán)。雖然這些思路不失為保護(hù)刑事被害人權(quán)利的有益嘗試,但是如果考慮到刑事訴訟活動(dòng)作為一個(gè)有機(jī)整體的系統(tǒng)性與平衡性,就不難發(fā)現(xiàn),此類主張對(duì)于構(gòu)建公平合理的刑事訴訟環(huán)境毫無(wú)裨益。本文擬從以下六個(gè)方面對(duì)于我國(guó)刑事被害人的訴訟參與度問(wèn)題進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要探討,并嘗試提出刑事被害人訴訟參與度理性化的基本思考。文章第一部分對(duì)于刑事被害人的含義以及訴訟參與度的含義進(jìn)行了明晰,并提出了本文對(duì)"刑事被害人"概念的界定,為后文的寫作奠定了基礎(chǔ)。第二部分就刑事被害人保護(hù)問(wèn)題的國(guó)內(nèi)研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要分析,介紹了部分主流觀點(diǎn),并對(duì)這些觀點(diǎn)的合理性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了探討。在第三部分中,筆者對(duì)于刑事被害人的訴訟參與度問(wèn)題,分別選取了不同法系以及不同刑事訴訟模式的代表性國(guó)家,進(jìn)行了比較法的研究,以期在先進(jìn)的制度中汲取有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)。第四部分,重點(diǎn)就部分學(xué)者提出的,關(guān)于強(qiáng)化刑事被害人的訴訟參與度問(wèn)題的合理性和可行性進(jìn)行了反思,并就被害人過(guò)度參與刑事訴訟可能造成的消極影響進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要探討。第五部分,從刑事訴訟特點(diǎn)和原則、訴權(quán)問(wèn)題、現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)定等方面,對(duì)于我國(guó)刑事被害人訴訟參與度進(jìn)行了基本考量。第六部分,筆者提出了就刑事被害人訴訟參與度理性化問(wèn)題的基本思考,主要是在堅(jiān)持有限參與原則的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)于我國(guó)刑事訴訟活動(dòng)進(jìn)行相應(yīng)改造和完善,以保證現(xiàn)有規(guī)則的落地,同時(shí)輔之以社會(huì)化、多元化的矛盾解決機(jī)制,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)于刑事被害人各項(xiàng)權(quán)益的全面保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:As a direct victim of criminal activities and one of the participants in criminal proceedings, criminal victims deserve comprehensive protection and fair treatment. However, in our judicial practice, the protection of criminal victims has been criticized, the criminal victims can not really participate in the proceedings, it is difficult to have a substantial impact on the criminal proceedings. Most importantly, it is difficult to obtain adequate material and moral compensation in criminal proceedings. In order to solve this problem, under the influence of the worldwide victimology research boom, some domestic scholars put forward that criminal victims should be given more independent litigation status and broader and deeper litigation rights in legislation. And a better claim. Although these ideas are useful attempts to protect the rights of criminal victims, it is not difficult to find that if we consider the systematic and balanced nature of criminal proceedings as an organic whole, Such claims are of no benefit to the establishment of a fair and reasonable environment for criminal proceedings. This paper briefly discusses the participation of criminal victims in litigation from the following six aspects, and tries to put forward the basic thinking of rationalizing the participation of criminal victims in proceedings. In the first part, the meaning of the criminal victim and the degree of participation in the proceedings are clarified, and the definition of the concept of "criminal victim" is put forward in this paper, which lays a foundation for the later writing. The second part briefly analyzes the domestic research status of criminal victim protection, introduces some mainstream views, and discusses the rationality of these views. In the third part, the author chooses the representative countries of different legal system and different criminal procedure mode to study the comparative law in order to learn useful experience from the advanced system. In the fourth part, the author mainly discusses the rationality and feasibility of strengthening the participation of criminal victims in criminal proceedings, and discusses the possible negative effects caused by the excessive participation of victims in criminal proceedings. The fifth part, from the criminal procedure characteristic and the principle, the lawsuit right question, the present legislation stipulation and so on, has carried on the basic consideration to our country criminal victim lawsuit participation degree. In the sixth part, the author puts forward the basic thinking on the rationality of criminal victim's participation in litigation, mainly on the basis of adhering to the principle of limited participation, and reforming and perfecting the criminal proceedings in our country accordingly. In order to ensure the landing of the existing rules, at the same time supplemented by a socialized, diversified conflict resolution mechanism, the ultimate realization of the overall protection of the rights and interests of criminal victims.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜永浩,石明磊;論刑事被害人的界定[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

2 竹林君;;比較法視野中的法律創(chuàng)新與借鑒——從如何救濟(jì)刑事被害人談起[J];人民檢察;2006年07期

3 榮月;;我國(guó)刑事被害人權(quán)利保障之初探[J];長(zhǎng)春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年09期

4 朱文濤;張占彪;苗庭選;鄭淑敏;;有關(guān)刑事被害人救助問(wèn)題的思考[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2008年11期

5 薛國(guó)駿;;刑事被害人救助制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2008年11期

6 陳彬;李昌林;;刑事被害人救濟(jì)制度應(yīng)分階段構(gòu)建[J];法制資訊;2009年03期

7 唐麗麗;;刑事被害人救助制度論略[J];安徽電子信息職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

8 丁玉明;楊睿森;;我國(guó)刑事被害人司法救助制度研究[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2009年12期

9 黎光明;易志斌;;我國(guó)刑事被害人救助制度立法考量[J];湖南行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

10 趙麗;;刑事被害人救助制度價(jià)值初探[J];理論觀察;2010年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 丁英華;;刑事被害人救濟(jì)法律性質(zhì)辨析[A];中國(guó)犯罪學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)第十七屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

2 潘弘;陸晶晶;;國(guó)外的刑事被害人救助制度研究[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第2輯）[C];2010年

3 田鵬輝;;構(gòu)建我國(guó)刑事被害人社會(huì)保障制度之思考[A];中國(guó)犯罪學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)第十七屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

4 王成玉;高s，

本文編號(hào)：2115180