本文選題：督促程序 + 程序效益　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：督促程序作為一種糾紛快速解決機制，在他國發(fā)揮著良好的效益，極大地緩解案件劇增的壓力，但在我國，督促程序卻因其設(shè)計欠缺等因素而成為一道虛置程序。為激活督促程序應(yīng)有的訴訟效益，實現(xiàn)其訴訟價值，使其得到良好的運行，本文立足于民事訴訟法對于督促程序的修改，反思督促程序在過去運行中所處的窘境，，細化督促程序的適用，力求使其真正實現(xiàn)本次民事訴訟法對其修改所賦予的期望。 第一部分為督促程序的概述。首先對其進行明確定義，并提出筆者對于督促程序性質(zhì)的認識。其次，分析督促程序設(shè)立的立法目的與法理基礎(chǔ)，明確督促程序的訴訟效益。最后，回顧我國對于督促程序適用的立法進程。 第二部分為分析督促程序在民事訴訟法修改前所面臨的適用困境。從當事人怠于適用督促程序與法院缺乏適用督促程序的積極性從而使較多本應(yīng)適用該程序的案件被分化兩方面入手，發(fā)現(xiàn)督促程序在民事訴訟法修訂前的適用問題。 第三部分為剖析本次民訴法對于督促程序的修改。首先，立足本次民訴法對于督促程序的調(diào)整，分析程序改良的進步之處以及是否解決就修法前督促程序虛置所存在的問題予以解決。其次，分析此次修改可能帶來的眾多問題，分別從程序請求權(quán)、啟動機制、程序銜接、重復(fù)審查等多方面入手，發(fā)現(xiàn)此次程序修改所可能帶來的問題。 第四部分為督促程序比較研究。借鑒德國、日本及臺灣地區(qū)適用督促程序的特點，分別從啟動機制、支付令異議、異議審查、程序銜接四方面入手，與我國現(xiàn)行督促程序的適用進行比較研究，從而分析其各自的價值取向及利弊。 第五部分：構(gòu)建我國督促程序的規(guī)范化運作。借鑒他國經(jīng)驗之上，立足于我國實際，對于督促程序的運行進行細化。從督促程序的啟動—異議審查—程序銜接三方面進行展開，細化運行環(huán)節(jié)，力求使督促程序可以得到良好運行。
[Abstract]:As a kind of quick dispute resolution mechanism, the supervision procedure plays a good role in other countries and greatly alleviates the pressure of the sharp increase of cases. However, in our country, the supervision procedure becomes a false procedure because of its lack of design and other factors. In order to activate the lawsuit benefit of supervision procedure, realize its lawsuit value and make it run well, this paper bases on the modification of supervision procedure in civil procedure law, and reflects on the dilemma of supervision procedure in the past. The application of the detailed supervision procedure is to fulfill the expectation of this civil procedure law. The first part is the summary of supervision procedure. Firstly, it is clearly defined, and the author's understanding of the nature of supervision procedure is put forward. Secondly, it analyzes the legislative purpose and legal basis of the establishment of the supervision procedure, and clarifies the litigation benefit of the supervision procedure. Finally, review our country to supervise and urge the procedure to apply the legislative process. The second part is the analysis of the supervision procedure in the civil procedure law before the revision of the difficulties faced by the application. Starting from the two aspects of the parties' slacking on the application of supervision procedure and the lack of enthusiasm of the court to apply the supervision procedure so as to divide more cases that should be applied to the procedure, the author finds out the application of the supervision procedure before the revision of the civil procedure law. The third part is the analysis of the civil action law for the amendment of the supervision procedure. Firstly, based on the adjustment of the supervision procedure, the paper analyzes the progress of the procedure improvement and whether to solve the existing problems before the law amendment. Secondly, this paper analyzes many problems that may be brought about by this amendment, starting from the claim of procedure, starting mechanism, program convergence, repeated examination and so on, and finds out the problems that may be brought about by the modification of the procedure. The fourth part is the comparative study of the supervision procedure. Drawing lessons from the characteristics of the applicable supervision procedures in Germany, Japan and Taiwan, starting from the four aspects of the starting mechanism, the dissent of payment orders, the examination of dissent, and the convergence of procedures, this paper makes a comparative study with the application of the current supervision procedures in our country. Thus, it analyzes their respective value orientation and advantages and disadvantages. Part five: constructing the standardized operation of supervision procedure in our country. Learn from the experience of other countries, based on the reality of our country, the operation of the supervision process to be refined. In order to make the prodication program run well, it is carried out from three aspects, starting-up-dissenting examination-procedure linking up with supervision and urging procedure, in order to refine the running link.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.18

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 章武生;督促程序的改革與完善[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年02期

2 李豐安;;督促程序的破滅與再生——以支付令異議審查制度的完善為視角[J];山東大學(xué)法律評論;2012年00期

本文編號：2114460