本文選題：釋明權(quán) + 辯論主義　； 參考：《海南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 法官釋明權(quán)制度是大陸法系國(guó)家民事訴訟中的重要制度,在我國(guó)民事訴訟中也有著舉足輕重的作用。辯論主義和處分主義是法官釋明權(quán)制度的基礎(chǔ),通過(guò)法官釋明可以有效彌補(bǔ)當(dāng)事人主義的種種弊端,從而公正高效地解決糾紛。我國(guó)在民事審判方式的改革中本著“司法為民”的宗旨不斷強(qiáng)化當(dāng)事人的主體地位,但是我國(guó)當(dāng)事人訴訟能力參差不齊且國(guó)內(nèi)沒(méi)有實(shí)行律師強(qiáng)制代理制度,具體訴訟操作中仍需由法官引導(dǎo),這樣才能保證實(shí)質(zhì)正義和程序公正。因此我國(guó)該怎樣規(guī)范法官釋明權(quán)行使已引起了學(xué)術(shù)界和實(shí)務(wù)界的廣泛關(guān)注。本文擬借我國(guó)民事審判改革之機(jī),從理論與實(shí)務(wù)角度來(lái)探究法官釋明權(quán)的相關(guān)問(wèn)題,以期規(guī)范我國(guó)民事訴訟中的法官釋明權(quán)。 本文除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外共分五個(gè)部分： 第一部分：法官釋明權(quán)的一般理論。通過(guò)介紹法官釋明權(quán)的內(nèi)涵、分類(lèi)及價(jià)值,對(duì)法官釋明權(quán)有一個(gè)基本的了解和定位。 第二部分：法官釋明權(quán)的域外立法概況。通過(guò)介紹域外主要國(guó)家和地區(qū)關(guān)于法官釋明權(quán)的立法概況,比較分析它們的共同點(diǎn),得出在訴訟中加強(qiáng)法官的管理、引導(dǎo)作用是兩大法系主要國(guó)家和地區(qū)共同的選擇和發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。 第三部分：法官釋明權(quán)與相關(guān)理論的關(guān)系。通過(guò)介紹法官釋明權(quán)與辯論主義、處分主義的關(guān)系指出辯論主義、處分主義是法官釋明權(quán)進(jìn)行的基礎(chǔ),同時(shí)法官釋明權(quán)又對(duì)它們具有促進(jìn)作用；通過(guò)介紹法官釋明權(quán)與訴訟指揮權(quán)的關(guān)系可以更進(jìn)一步證實(shí)法官釋明權(quán)是民事訴訟程序中的重要組成部分。 第四部分：我國(guó)法官釋明權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀考察。通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)法官釋明權(quán)的立法及司法現(xiàn)狀、它們存在的缺陷、以及存在這些缺陷的原因進(jìn)行分析,指出我國(guó)有存在法官釋明權(quán)制度的必要。 第五部分：我國(guó)法官釋明權(quán)制度的立法規(guī)范。在我國(guó)司法改革的過(guò)程中,筆者通過(guò)借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法和司法經(jīng)驗(yàn),結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際情況,從立法上為規(guī)范法官釋明權(quán)行使提出一些建議,希望這些粗陋的建議能為我國(guó)法官釋明權(quán)制度的規(guī)范提供有效的借鑒。
[Abstract]:The system of judge's right of interpretation is an important system in civil litigation in civil law countries, and also plays an important role in civil litigation in our country. Argumentalism and disciplinary doctrine are the basis of the system of the judge's interpretation of the right, through which the judge's explanation can effectively make up for the malpractice of the litigant doctrine and solve the dispute fairly and efficiently. In the reform of the way of civil trial, our country constantly strengthens the principal position of the parties in line with the aim of "the administration of justice for the people", but the litigants' capacity of litigation in our country is uneven and the system of compulsory representation of lawyers has not been implemented in our country. In order to ensure substantive justice and procedural justice, it is still necessary for the judge to guide the specific litigation operation. Therefore, how to regulate the exercise of judges' right of interpretation has aroused widespread concern in academic and practical circles. This article intends to use the opportunity of our country's civil trial reform to probe into the relevant problems of the judge's right of interpretation from the angle of theory and practice, in order to standardize the judge's right of interpretation in our country's civil litigation. This paper is divided into five parts except introduction and conclusion: the first part: the general theory of the judge's right of interpretation. By introducing the connotation, classification and value of the judge's right of interpretation, there is a basic understanding and orientation of the right of the judge's interpretation. The second part: the general situation of the extraterritorial legislation of the judge's power of interpretation. By introducing the legislative survey of the judges' interpretation power in the main countries and regions of foreign countries and regions, and comparing and analyzing their common points, it is concluded that the management of judges should be strengthened in the litigation. The leading role is the common choice and development trend of the two major legal system countries and regions. The third part: the relationship between the judge's right of interpretation and relevant theories. By introducing the relationship between the judge's right of interpretation and the doctrine of debate, the author points out that the doctrine of disposition is the basis of the judge's right of interpretation, and at the same time, the right of the judge's interpretation plays an important role in promoting them. By introducing the relationship between the judge's right of interpretation and the right of command, it can be further proved that the right of interpretation is an important part of the civil procedure. The fourth part: the investigation of the present situation of the judge's right of interpretation in our country. Based on the analysis of the legislation and judicial status of the judges' right of interpretation in our country, their defects and the reasons for these defects, it is pointed out that there is a necessity for the existence of the system of the judges' power of interpretation in our country. The fifth part: our country judge interprets the power system the legislative norm. In the process of judicial reform in our country, the author, by drawing lessons from the advanced legislation and judicial experience of foreign countries and combining the actual situation of our country, puts forward some suggestions for standardizing the exercise of the judge's right of interpretation from the legislative point of view. It is hoped that these crude suggestions can provide effective reference for the norms of the system of interpretation of judges in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 畢玉謙;;對(duì)民事訴訟中法官闡明權(quán)的基本解讀[J];法學(xué)家;2006年06期

2 蔡虹;釋明權(quán):基礎(chǔ)透視與制度構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年01期

3 李倩;;訴訟指揮權(quán)與釋明權(quán)的理論探析和路徑規(guī)制[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年04期

4 王偉凱;;法官釋明權(quán)在中國(guó)存在的正當(dāng)理由分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年28期

5 薛鵬;袁武強(qiáng);;論民事訴訟中法官釋明權(quán)的質(zhì)、量、度[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年13期

6 張文強(qiáng);;論民事訴訟法上的法官釋明權(quán)及其適用[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年16期

7 夏明貴;;在實(shí)然與應(yīng)然之間:法官釋明權(quán)行使的實(shí)證研究[J];法治研究;2007年11期

8 常怡;肖瑤;;論法官中立——以民事訴訟為視角[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

9 陳楊;張赫楠;;中國(guó)司法改革中的程序正義取向——釋明權(quán)初探[J];南方論刊;2008年06期

10 王安;吳國(guó)強(qiáng);何俐;;論訴訟心理學(xué)在釋明權(quán)行使中的運(yùn)用[J];人民司法;2007年13期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 山 民;[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 馬東陽(yáng);構(gòu)建我國(guó)法官釋明權(quán)制度的思考[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

2 劉玲;論民事訴訟中法官的釋明權(quán)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

3 呂璐璐;我國(guó)民事訴訟中法官釋明權(quán)制度研究[D];河南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2106068