本文選題：合理懷疑 + 經(jīng)驗法則��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)堪稱證據(jù)法中的靈魂，它直接關(guān)系到刑事判決的質(zhì)量和司法公正的實現(xiàn)。如何正確地理解和運用證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)可謂是司法實踐中的一個難題。新刑事訴訟法將排除合理懷疑吸收為證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的一部分，使其成為證據(jù)確實、充分的一種解釋，，這就要求在判斷證據(jù)確實、充分時要達(dá)到排除合理懷疑的程度。在此大背景下，探討排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的內(nèi)涵以及適用方法意義重大。 本文正文包括四部分，總計一萬九千余字。主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分探討了中國排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的由來。闡述了排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)如何從被批判的角色一步步地為學(xué)者所認(rèn)同并最終被立法者所采納，為下一部分闡釋排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的內(nèi)涵和司法適用確立一個宏觀知識背景。 第二部分闡釋了排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的內(nèi)涵，并著重論述其在司法實踐中的具體操作步驟。對其內(nèi)涵的界定，不同于以往一些學(xué)者僅關(guān)注其主觀內(nèi)容，筆者以便于司法實踐的運用為宗旨，從主客觀兩個方面闡述了自己的觀點；對其四個操作步驟的說明可以看出其不僅是一個證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，而且可以作為一種證明方法，對其在司法實踐中所具有的可操作性我們將有一個比較直觀的認(rèn)識和理解。 第三部分主要寫如何有效地運用經(jīng)驗法則和邏輯規(guī)則對排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)內(nèi)涵的界定中所形成的兩個爭議點進(jìn)行解釋。對懷疑的合理性內(nèi)涵和有罪判決結(jié)論唯一性的理解是把握排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的關(guān)鍵。不可否認(rèn)，對這兩個爭議點有多重解釋的角度，但運用經(jīng)驗法則和邏輯規(guī)則來闡釋應(yīng)該是最為主要的方式。對其中的關(guān)鍵問題，筆者運用多個案例加以說明，以便于理解。該部分是本文的重點。 第四部分簡單地敘寫了與排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相關(guān)的配套措施的完善，以便于使其在實踐中更好地運用。
[Abstract]:The standard of proof is the soul of the law of evidence, which is directly related to the quality of criminal judgment and the realization of judicial justice. How to correctly understand and apply the standard of proof is a difficult problem in judicial practice. The new Code of Criminal procedure absorbs reasonable doubt as a part of the standard of proof and makes it a kind of explanation that evidence is true and sufficient, which requires that the degree of beyond reasonable doubt should be reached when the evidence is true and sufficient. Under this background, it is of great significance to discuss the connotation and applicable method of the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt. The text of this paper consists of four parts, a total of more than 19000 words. The main contents are as follows: the first part discusses the origin of China's reasonable doubt standard. This paper expounds how the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt is accepted by scholars step by step from the critical role and finally adopted by the legislator, and establishes a macroscopic knowledge background for the next part to explain the connotation of the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt and the judicial application. The second part explains the connotation of the standard of eliminating reasonable doubt, and emphatically discusses its concrete operation steps in judicial practice. The definition of its connotation is different from that some scholars only pay attention to its subjective content in the past. In order to facilitate the application of judicial practice, the author expounds his own views from two aspects: subjective and objective; The explanation of its four operation steps shows that it is not only a standard of proof, but also a method of proof. We will have a more intuitionistic understanding and understanding of its maneuverability in judicial practice. The third part mainly describes how to effectively use the rules of experience and logic to explain the two controversial points formed in the definition of the standard of beyond reasonable doubt. The understanding of the rationality connotation of doubt and the uniqueness of conclusion of guilty judgment is the key to grasp the criterion of eliminating reasonable doubt. There is no denying how many interpretations of these two controversial points, but the use of the rules of experience and logic to explain should be the most important way. In order to understand the key problems, the author uses several cases to explain them. This part is the focus of this paper. The fourth part simply describes the perfection of the relevant measures related to the elimination of reasonable doubt in order to make it better used in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 汪海燕,胡常龍;自由心證新理念探析——走出對自由心證傳統(tǒng)認(rèn)識的誤區(qū)[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年05期

2 李昌盛;;反思排除合理懷疑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2013年01期

3 劉春梅;淺論經(jīng)驗法則在事實認(rèn)定中的作用及局限性之克服[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年03期

4 陳永生;排除合理懷疑及其在西方面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];中國法學(xué);2003年02期

5 樊崇義;鎖正杰;吳宏耀;陳永生;;刑事證據(jù)前沿問題研究[J];證據(jù)學(xué)論壇;2000年00期

6 龍宗智;;中國法語境中的“排除合理懷疑”[J];中外法學(xué);2012年06期

本文編號：2105966