本文選題：庭審參與權(quán) + 程序保障��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事被害人有許多的訴訟權(quán)利,這些權(quán)利是有層次之分的,有些是與實體權(quán)利相關(guān)的程序權(quán)利,有些是單純的程序權(quán)利,還有一些是訴訟中涉及到的其他權(quán)利。筆者將這些權(quán)利分為庭審參與權(quán)以及訴訟參與中的其他權(quán)利。庭審參與權(quán)是被害人訴訟權(quán)利的核心,因此這些權(quán)利體現(xiàn)了被害人對事實認定以及定罪量刑意見表達；而其他權(quán)利則包括引起訴訟開始的報案權(quán)、起訴權(quán)以及庭審過后的執(zhí)行參與權(quán)以及上訴權(quán)等等。賦予被害人相關(guān)權(quán)利之后,還要有相關(guān)的程序制度來保障這些權(quán)利的行使,比如為公權(quán)力機關(guān)設(shè)置義務(wù)或者用程序制裁制度；且為了不讓被害人濫用權(quán)力,還有一定的程序限制,使得被害人在行使權(quán)利的過程中,不對被告人產(chǎn)生不合理的負效應(yīng)。程序保障不僅是單獨保障被害人的權(quán)利,更是在于保障整個訴訟程序的整體效果。要討論加強刑事被害人的權(quán)利,不可避免就會碰到其與司法權(quán)力,特別是檢察院職權(quán)以及被告人權(quán)利的摩擦和矛盾。檢察院和被害人在某種程度上追求的目的和發(fā)揮的作用都是重合的,但是由于檢察院代表的更多是國家利益,被害人的利益容易受到排擠；被害人與被告人都擁有當(dāng)事人的訴訟地位,但是兩者的對立導(dǎo)致他們的利益有一種此消彼長的關(guān)系,但是在某種角度上,兩者之間又在解決社會矛盾的方面產(chǎn)生了合力。文章共分為四章,第一章是對刑事被害人訴訟權(quán)利程序保障的概述,簡要介紹了被害人、被害人訴訟權(quán)利以及程序保障的含義以及對被害人訴訟權(quán)利程序保障的價值分析；第二章是探討被害人訴訟權(quán)利程序保障的基本理論,包括被害人訴訟權(quán)利的內(nèi)容、分類,以及被害人權(quán)利與公權(quán)力、被告人權(quán)利之間的關(guān)系和平衡；第三章則是根據(jù)我國現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟制度中對被害人保護的規(guī)定,提出其存在的問題；第四章對我國刑事訴訟制度提出建議如何進一步保障被害人的訴訟權(quán)利。
[Abstract]:Criminal victims have many procedural rights, some of which are procedural rights related to substantive rights, some are simple procedural rights, and some are other rights involved in litigation. The author divides these rights into trial participation right and other rights in litigation participation. The right to participate in the trial is the core of the rights of the victim in the proceedings, so these rights reflect the expression of the victim's opinion on the facts and the conviction and sentencing; and other rights include the right to report the case, which causes the commencement of the proceedings, The right to sue, the right to participate in the execution after the trial, the right of appeal and so on. After the victim is given relevant rights, there must be relevant procedural systems to guarantee the exercise of these rights, such as imposing obligations on public authorities or imposing procedural sanctions; and in order not to allow victims to abuse their power, There are some procedural restrictions, so that the victim does not have unreasonable negative effect on the defendant in the process of exercising his right. Procedural protection is not only to protect the rights of victims alone, but also to protect the overall effect of the whole procedure. If we want to discuss how to strengthen the rights of criminal victims, we will inevitably encounter the friction and contradiction between them and the judicial power, especially the power of procuratorate and the rights of the accused. To some extent, the purpose and role of the procuratorate and the victim are identical, but the interests of the victim are easily excluded because the procuratorate represents more national interests. Both the victim and the defendant have the litigant status, but the opposition between them leads to a relationship between their interests, but in a certain angle, there is a resultant force in solving the social contradiction between them. The article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the procedural protection of criminal victims' procedural rights. It briefly introduces the meaning of the victim, the victim's procedural protection and the value of the procedural protection of the victim's procedural rights. The second chapter discusses the basic theory of the procedural protection of the victim's procedural rights, including the content and classification of the victim's procedural rights, as well as the relationship and balance between the victim's rights and the public rights and the rights of the accused. The third chapter is according to our country's current criminal procedure system in the protection of victims, put forward its existing problems; the fourth chapter of our country's criminal procedure system recommendations on how to further protect the victim's procedural rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 霍建中,韓文成;論犯罪人與被害人的互動關(guān)系[J];河北法學(xué);1999年01期

2 王麗華;;美國被害人保護制度及其借鑒[J];社會科學(xué)家;2012年07期

3 王艷;王建林;;我國刑事訴訟模式的轉(zhuǎn)型與辯護制度的變革[J];紹興文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué));2012年05期

4 陳瑞華;程序正義論——從刑事審判角度的分析[J];中外法學(xué);1997年02期

5 李毅;;論被害人權(quán)益保護——以審查起訴為視角[J];榆林學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期

，

本文編號：2105787