本文選題：公益訴訟 + 消費(fèi)者維權(quán)　； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：新民事訴訟法規(guī)定了對(duì)于環(huán)境污染和侵害眾多消費(fèi)者合法權(quán)益等公共利益的行為可以提起公益訴訟，這一規(guī)定標(biāo)志著我國(guó)的法律制度在公益訴訟上邁出了重要的一步。但是，，我國(guó)的消費(fèi)者維權(quán)公益訴訟制度的構(gòu)建之路還很漫長(zhǎng)。提起公益訴訟的主體并不明確、公益訴訟中如何分擔(dān)舉證責(zé)任也有待商榷、如何減輕公益訴訟費(fèi)用值得我們深思、如何建立訴訟激約機(jī)制、怎樣適當(dāng)延長(zhǎng)公益訴訟的訴訟時(shí)效、能不能擴(kuò)張?jiān)V訟判決的效力，這一系列的問(wèn)題都引起了學(xué)術(shù)界和司法界的廣泛討論。筆者分四個(gè)章節(jié)對(duì)這一系列問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了論述。第一章對(duì)消費(fèi)者維權(quán)公益訴訟的含義、特征以及法理基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行了論述，讓我們了解什么是消費(fèi)者維權(quán)公益訴訟。第二章通過(guò)分析傳統(tǒng)消費(fèi)者訴訟存在的不足，討論消費(fèi)者維權(quán)公益訴訟在我國(guó)存在具有必要性。第三章在介紹美國(guó)的集團(tuán)訴訟和德國(guó)團(tuán)體訴訟模式的基礎(chǔ)上，分析美國(guó)和德國(guó)的公益訴訟模式對(duì)我國(guó)具有哪些啟示和借鑒。第四章筆者對(duì)我國(guó)消費(fèi)者維權(quán)公益訴訟的建立提出了一些構(gòu)想，包括：健全原告資格制度、舉證責(zé)任合理分擔(dān)、減輕訴訟費(fèi)用等。希望對(duì)我國(guó)消費(fèi)者維權(quán)公益訴訟制度的立法和司法有所幫助。
[Abstract]:The new civil procedure law stipulates that public interest litigation can be brought against environmental pollution and infringements on the legal rights and interests of many consumers. This regulation marks an important step forward in public interest litigation in China's legal system. However, China's consumer rights litigation system is still a long way to build. The main body of public interest litigation is not clear, how to share the burden of proof in public interest litigation is also open to question, how to reduce the cost of public interest litigation is worth pondering, how to establish the mechanism of litigation, how to properly extend the limitation of action in public interest litigation, Whether we can expand the validity of litigation judgment, this series of issues have aroused extensive discussion in academic and judicial circles. The author divides into four chapters to carry on the discussion to this series of questions. The first chapter discusses the meaning, characteristics and legal basis of consumer public interest litigation, so that we can understand what consumer rights public interest litigation is. The second chapter discusses the necessity of consumer rights litigation in China by analyzing the shortcomings of traditional consumer litigation. On the basis of the introduction of the class action in the United States and the group action in Germany, the third chapter analyzes the enlightenment and reference of the public interest litigation model of the United States and Germany to our country. In the fourth chapter, the author puts forward some ideas on the establishment of consumer rights litigation in China, including: perfecting the plaintiff qualification system, sharing the burden of proof reasonably, reducing the costs of litigation and so on. I hope it will be helpful to the legislation and judicature of public interest litigation system of consumer rights protection in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1;D923.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葛傲雪;;論我國(guó)消費(fèi)者公益訴訟制度的構(gòu)建[J];研究生法學(xué);2006年03期

2 邊立宏;;從消費(fèi)者群體權(quán)益保護(hù)視角談我國(guó)的公益訴訟[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2007年09期

3 錢(qián)雄偉;;論消費(fèi)領(lǐng)域公益訴訟之完善[J];鄂州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

4 廖深基;試論中國(guó)特色公益訴訟制度的構(gòu)建[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

5 梁玉超;;民事公益訴訟模式的選擇[J];法學(xué);2007年06期

6 喬旭;;論我國(guó)消費(fèi)者公益訴訟程序的構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年20期

7 譚新;呂晨輝;;論我國(guó)消費(fèi)者公益訴訟制度的構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年33期

8 朱曉曉;;淺論消費(fèi)者公益訴訟的機(jī)制建立[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年16期

9 陳麗芳;;試論消費(fèi)者權(quán)益訴訟機(jī)制的建立[J];廣州市公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

10 郭潔;;淺析民事公益訴訟制度[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年12期

本文編號(hào)：2082612