本文選題：精神病 + 司法鑒定�。� 參考：《煙臺大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事司法精神病鑒定對刑事案件判決結果的影響是重大的,尤其在故意殺人、搶劫等最高刑期為死刑的案件中,甚至直接決定著被鑒定人的生與死。近年來,疑似精神病作案的案例仍屢見不鮮,此類“疑似精神病患者”的犯罪案件廣受關注,不斷引發(fā)社會熱議。鑒于此,依法不負刑事責任的精神病人的強制醫(yī)療程序第一次被寫入刑事訴訟法,并于2013年實施。這一制度雖然健全完善了精神病人犯罪的后續(xù)處置程序,但不容否定的是,我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度仍然有諸多不足之處。除引言外,本文共分三個部分:第一部分從刑事司法精神病鑒定制度入手,對刑事司法精神病鑒定的概念及特征、確立的理論基礎等基本知識進行了闡述,為下文的論述奠定基礎。第二部分,采用正反對比的方法,先從正面對我國現(xiàn)行刑事司法精神病鑒定制度及其積極意義進行了闡述,后從反面指出了我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度在精神病鑒定決定權、鑒定管理體制、訴訟參與人訴權等方面存在的缺陷。第三部分,也是本文的重點,通過分析中外精神病鑒定制度,從加強司法機關精神病鑒定決定權的監(jiān)控、健全刑事司法精神病鑒定體制、推動刑事司法精神病鑒定訴訟參與人的訴訟化等四大方面提出了完善我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度的構想,以期對健全完善我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The identification of criminal justice psychosis has a great influence on the result of the criminal case, especially in the case of the supreme sentence of the death penalty, such as intentional homicide, robbery and so on. In recent years, the cases of suspected psychotic cases are still common, and the criminal cases of "suspected psychotic patients" are widely accepted. In view of this, the compulsory medical procedures for mental patients who are not responsible for criminal responsibility are first written into the criminal procedure law and implemented in 2013. Although the system has perfected the follow-up procedure of the mental patients' crime, it can not be denied that the system of forensic psychiatry identification is still in our country. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into three parts: the first part, starting with the identification system of criminal justice psychosis, expounds the basic knowledge of the concept and characteristics of the identification of criminal justice psychosis and the theoretical basis of the establishment of the theory, and lays the foundation for the discussion below. The second part, using the positive and negative contrast method, first comes from the front. This paper expounds the current criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system and its positive significance, and then points out the defects in the identification system of mental illness in China's criminal judicial psychiatric identification system in the determination of mental illness, the system of identification and management, and the right of litigious litigation. The third part is also the focus of this article, through the analysis of Chinese and foreign psychosis. The appraisal system, from four aspects, such as strengthening the supervision of the determination of the judicial organ's mental illness, perfecting the system of forensic mental illness identification, and promoting the litigation of the participant in the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal litigation, puts forward the idea of perfecting the system of identification of the mental illness in criminal judicature in our country, with a view to perfecting and perfecting the mental illness of our criminal judicature. It is beneficial to set the system.
【學位授予單位】：煙臺大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉道前;;我國鑒定人資格授予的反思與建議[J];人民論壇;2017年04期

2 賀小軍;;精神病鑒定的悖論及其破解[J];證據(jù)科學;2016年01期

3 劉曉慶;;立足司法實踐試論我國刑事被害人救助問題[J];法制與社會;2015年21期

4 李菊萍;韓衛(wèi);顧珊智;陳騰;;論法醫(yī)臨床鑒定中被鑒定人的知情同意權[J];法醫(yī)學雜志;2015年01期

5 田毅平;;新刑事訴訟法鑒定制度不足與再完善[J];湖北社會科學;2013年07期

6 劉哲;;刑事二審程序問題研究——兼評《刑事訴訟法》修改相關內容[J];法律適用;2012年07期

7 王敏遠;;論我國刑事證據(jù)法的轉變[J];法學家;2012年03期

8 張青;;刑事訴訟中司法鑒定質證程序完善構想[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社會科學版);2012年02期

9 陳心歌;;論刑事司法鑒定制度的基本原則——以刑事訴訟法的修改為視角[J];證據(jù)科學;2011年05期

10 張愛艷;;“精神病”與刑事責任能力的判斷[J];政法論叢;2011年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 吳彩玲;論我國精神病人強制醫(yī)療程序的立法完善[D];廣東商學院;2013年

，

本文編號：2080500