本文選題：民事訴訟 + 要件事實(shí)理論��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：要件事實(shí)理論是民事訴訟法學(xué)中的重要理論，對(duì)民事訴訟實(shí)踐具有指導(dǎo)作用，也是連接民事實(shí)體法與程序法的一道“橋梁”。民事實(shí)體法中的要件事實(shí)能夠通過(guò)訴訟程序予以體現(xiàn)，并且訴訟程序本身的設(shè)置可以解決實(shí)體法適用的不足。要件事實(shí)理論中的主張責(zé)任和釋明權(quán)為當(dāng)事人進(jìn)行民事訴訟提供了一個(gè)“場(chǎng)”，為其設(shè)定攻擊防御規(guī)則，并且引導(dǎo)其以正確的方式實(shí)施攻擊防御。任何理論均需要應(yīng)用于實(shí)踐并指導(dǎo)實(shí)踐，那么，如何應(yīng)用要件事實(shí)理論處理一件具體的案件糾紛呢？筆者選取一例建設(shè)工程設(shè)計(jì)合同糾紛，詳細(xì)分析要件事實(shí)理論在其中的適用，并總結(jié)和提煉出所反映的問(wèn)題。鑒于實(shí)體法與程序法相輔相成，要件事實(shí)理論的發(fā)展也離不開實(shí)體法理論的研究，因此，筆者結(jié)合民法理論中的公平原則，提出在公平原則指導(dǎo)下要件事實(shí)理論的發(fā)展和完善。 本文主要從以下幾個(gè)方面對(duì)要件事實(shí)理論在建設(shè)工程合同糾紛中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行了闡述。第一部分是理論闡述，首先概述了要件事實(shí)理論，包括該理論的緣起、概念、特征、作用以及相關(guān)的其他法律概念。其次本文著重論述要件事實(shí)理論中的主張責(zé)任和釋明權(quán)。主張責(zé)任理論是要件事實(shí)重要的理論，其不僅為民事訴訟當(dāng)事人設(shè)定了攻擊防御體系，更是在要件事實(shí)無(wú)法認(rèn)定時(shí)為法官提供了審理裁判的依據(jù)。釋明權(quán)是訴訟指揮權(quán)的重要組成部分，在不影響法官超然中立性地位的前提下，平衡當(dāng)事人之間的訴訟能力，引導(dǎo)訴訟的進(jìn)程，防止“投機(jī)性訴訟”。第二部分以建設(shè)工程合同為切入點(diǎn)，結(jié)合要件事實(shí)理論，對(duì)該類型合同涉及的相關(guān)法條進(jìn)行分析，提煉出法條中的訴訟標(biāo)的，明晰其中的要件事實(shí)（包括請(qǐng)求原因事實(shí)與抗辯事實(shí)）。第三部分中，筆者選取了一起建設(shè)工程設(shè)計(jì)合同糾紛案件法官的審理認(rèn)定情況，通過(guò)對(duì)案件判決的分析，找出其中存在的問(wèn)題和值得借鑒的地方。第四部分，筆者對(duì)民法中的公平原則進(jìn)行了論述，包括概述、適用、局限性和功能。對(duì)于本文案例中存在的有關(guān)要件事實(shí)理論問(wèn)題，筆者結(jié)合公平原則，提出了相應(yīng)的發(fā)展和完善途徑。第一，明確具體糾紛中的要件事實(shí)，為當(dāng)事人的主張責(zé)任提供公平的基礎(chǔ)和實(shí)施途徑，并且保證各當(dāng)事人在糾紛中具有平等的地位。第二，通過(guò)法官釋明權(quán)的行使，輔之以專家證人的意見或解釋，避免在案件審理過(guò)程中由于涉及知識(shí)的專業(yè)性而導(dǎo)致的實(shí)質(zhì)上的不公平。以公平原則為總領(lǐng)方針，完善合同糾紛審理過(guò)程中的要件事實(shí)理論，以推動(dòng)具體案件審理結(jié)果的公平、公正，正確發(fā)揮要件事實(shí)理論在司法實(shí)踐中的指導(dǎo)作用。
[Abstract]:The theory of essential facts is an important theory in the law of civil procedure, which has a guiding role in the practice of civil procedure, and is also a "bridge" between civil substantive law and procedural law. The essential facts in the civil substantive law can be embodied through the procedure, and the procedure itself can solve the deficiency of the application of the substantive law. The claim responsibility and interpretation right in the theory of essential facts provide a "field" for the parties to carry out civil action, set up the rules of defense against attack, and guide them to carry out the defense of attack in a correct way. Any theory needs to be applied to practice and guide practice, so how to apply the theory of facts to deal with a specific case dispute? The author selects a case of contract dispute of construction engineering design, analyzes the application of the essentials theory in detail, and summarizes and abstracts the problems reflected. Since substantive law and procedural law complement each other and the development of the theory of essential facts is inseparable from the study of the theory of substantive law, the author puts forward the development and perfection of the theory of essential facts under the guidance of the principle of equity in the light of the principle of fairness in the theory of civil law. This paper expounds the application of the essentials fact theory in the contract dispute of construction project from the following aspects. The first part is the theoretical elaboration. Firstly, it summarizes the theory of facts of the elements, including the origin, concept, characteristics, function and other relevant legal concepts of the theory. Secondly, this paper focuses on the claim responsibility and interpretation right in the theory of essential facts. The theory of claim liability is an important theory of important elements fact, which not only sets up a defense system for the civil litigants, but also provides a basis for the judge to judge when the important facts cannot be confirmed. The right of interpretation is an important part of the command power of litigation. On the premise of not affecting the detached neutral position of the judge, it can balance the litigant ability between the parties, guide the process of litigation and prevent "speculative litigation". The second part takes the construction project contract as the breakthrough point, unifies the essential element fact theory, carries on the analysis to this kind of contract related law article, abstracts out the lawsuit object in the law article, In the third part, the author selects a construction project design contract dispute case judge's hearing confirmation situation, through the analysis to the case judgment, finds out the existence question and the worthy reference place. In the fourth part, the author discusses the principle of fairness in civil law, including the summary, application, limitation and function. In this paper, the author puts forward the corresponding ways of development and perfection in combination with the principle of fairness. The first is to clarify the facts of the elements in the specific dispute, to provide a fair basis and implementation way for the parties to claim responsibility, and to ensure the equal status of the parties in the dispute. Second, through the exercise of the judge's right of interpretation, supplemented by the opinions or explanations of expert witnesses, the substantive unfairness caused by the professional nature of knowledge in the trial of the case should be avoided. Taking the principle of fairness as the general guiding principle, we should perfect the theory of essential facts in the trial of contract disputes, so as to promote the fairness and fairness of the trial results of specific cases, and give full play to the guiding role of the theory of essential facts in the judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 段文波;;要件事實(shí)理論下的主張責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年05期

2 宋顯忠;肖凱提·阿布力米提;;法律事實(shí)的實(shí)證探究[J];法學(xué)論壇;2008年02期

3 鄒利琴;;理性主義、證據(jù)規(guī)則與證明理性——英美法律事實(shí)理論的前提與問(wèn)題轉(zhuǎn)向[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2009年05期

4 段文波;;民事要件事實(shí)與民事證明責(zé)任分配[J];學(xué)海;2006年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟濤;民事訴訟要件理論研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2076873