本文選題：行政復(fù)議 + 行政訴訟　； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為我們國(guó)家行政法領(lǐng)域最重要的兩種糾紛解決方式的行政復(fù)議和行政訴訟,兩者之間存在著許多相似之處,同時(shí)也包含著巨大的差異。受到我國(guó)現(xiàn)實(shí)國(guó)情的影響,我國(guó)行政復(fù)議和行政訴訟的銜接模式包含自由選擇型、復(fù)議前置型、行政復(fù)議終局型、逕行起訴型等四種類型,同時(shí)也存在著一系列的問(wèn)題。通過(guò)研究和借鑒世界典型國(guó)家關(guān)于行政復(fù)議和行政訴訟銜接模式的不同規(guī)定(包括美國(guó)的窮盡行政救濟(jì)模式、德國(guó)的和訴訟類型相結(jié)合的模式以及法日的自由選擇模式),并且立足于我們國(guó)家法制的現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展水平,提出在確立司法最終原則的前提下,建構(gòu)更適合我們國(guó)家國(guó)情、促進(jìn)我國(guó)法制向前發(fā)展的銜接模式。通過(guò)一系列銜接模式的重新設(shè)定和建構(gòu),最終實(shí)現(xiàn)行政復(fù)議和行政訴訟兩種救濟(jì)方式的良好互動(dòng),更好地保護(hù)行政相對(duì)人的合法利益。
[Abstract]:As the two most important dispute resolution methods in the field of administrative law in our country, administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation have many similarities and great differences. Influenced by the reality of our country, the connection mode of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation in our country includes four types: the free choice type, the review front type, the administrative reconsideration final type, and the direct prosecution type. At the same time, there are also a series of problems. By studying and drawing lessons from the different regulations of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation convergence model of typical countries in the world (including the exhausted administrative relief model of the United States), Based on the realistic development level of our country's legal system, this paper puts forward that, on the premise of establishing the ultimate principle of judicature, it is more suitable for the national conditions of our country. To promote the development of the legal system in China. Through the re-establishment and construction of a series of cohesive modes, the good interaction between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation can be realized, and the legitimate interests of administrative counterpart can be better protected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 李煜興;談玲;;行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟銜接關(guān)系的實(shí)定法探析[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年02期

2 周博文;;我國(guó)行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟銜接模式研究[J];公安研究;2010年12期

3 章志遠(yuǎn);我國(guó)行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟程序銜接之再思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年04期

4 章志遠(yuǎn);論行政復(fù)議與行政訴訟之程序銜接[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2005年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2072431