本文選題：刑事二審 + 期限　； 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事二審期限制度是關(guān)于司法審判機關(guān)審理刑事二審案件所須遵守的法定期限制度。審理期限限制度作為訴訟法中的一項重要制度,對保障公平與效率、維護當(dāng)事人人權(quán)等具有重要意義。 我國刑事審限制度源遠(yuǎn)流長,早在春秋戰(zhàn)國時期就有關(guān)于刑事審理期限最早的記載,1979年通過的《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》正式對刑事二審期限制度進(jìn)行了規(guī)定,并被我國現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟法承襲。目前我國關(guān)于刑事二審期限制度的規(guī)定主要體現(xiàn)在刑事訴訟法及相關(guān)司法解釋中,其基本內(nèi)容包括刑事二審案件的審理期限規(guī)定、延長、重新計算以及不計入審理期限的情形。 刑事二審審理期限制度是保證訴訟公正和高效的重要制度。合理的刑事二審期限不僅能保證公安司法機關(guān)及時、準(zhǔn)確地懲罰和打擊罪犯,較快地恢復(fù)被犯罪行為破壞的社會關(guān)系,而且能有效的防止被告人被無期限地羈押,保證其合法權(quán)益,進(jìn)而維系懲罰犯罪與保障人權(quán)之間的平衡,實現(xiàn)程序公正和實體公正。且審理期限制度還能最大限度地實現(xiàn)訴訟高效。 刑事二審期限制度通過為司法機關(guān)的行為設(shè)定期限,旨在促使公安司法機關(guān)盡快地完成其訴訟行為,防止訴訟拖延和超期羈押,進(jìn)而使有限的訴訟資源得到充分的利用。但是實踐中,司法機關(guān)每個辦案人員手中同時有好幾個案件,有些案件期限又差不多,為了完成任務(wù),為了追求所謂的“效率”,一些辦案人員免不了會敷衍,導(dǎo)致草草結(jié)案,使得正義無法得到伸張。 所以,刑事二審法官必須牢固樹立公正與效率的概念。公正與效率是刑事訴訟追求的目標(biāo),也是刑事二審程序的出發(fā)點與歸宿,其中的二者不可偏廢。刑事二審期限問題直接涉及的是二審效率,但前提是必須確保二審的公正,包括實體公正和程序公正。因此,適當(dāng)?shù)难娱L一些刑事二審案件審理期限有利于正確處理好公正與效率的關(guān)系,使得法官們能遵循“公正優(yōu)先,兼顧效率”的基本原則,在保障二審司法公正的前提下,確實遵守二審的法定期限,提高二審的辦案效率。 盡管刑事二審期限制度在我國已形成了較系統(tǒng)的規(guī)定,但該制度在司法實踐中仍然有很多問題與不足,隱形超期限審理問題還時有發(fā)生。這不僅了損害了司法權(quán)威,更侵犯了當(dāng)事人的正當(dāng)利益。因此,我國在對刑事二審期限制度的立法加以修改和完善的基礎(chǔ)上,還應(yīng)該加強相關(guān)理論認(rèn)知與完善相關(guān)配套措施,使得刑事二審案件都能在法定期限內(nèi)結(jié)案,保證公平與效率的高度統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:The second criminal trial period system is about the legal time limit system that the judicial organs must abide by when hearing the criminal second instance cases. As an important system in procedural law, the system of limitation of trial time limit is of great significance to safeguard fairness and efficiency, safeguard the human rights of the parties and so on. The criminal trial limit system in China has a long history. As early as the Spring and Autumn period and the warring States period, the earliest criminal trial period was recorded. The Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, adopted in 1979, formally stipulated the criminal second instance deadline system. And is inherited by our country's current criminal procedure law. At present, the stipulation of the time limit system of criminal second instance in our country is mainly reflected in the criminal procedure law and the related judicial interpretation. Its basic content includes the time limit of hearing the criminal second instance case, extending, recalculating and not counting the trial period. The time limit system of criminal second instance is an important system to guarantee the fairness and efficiency of litigation. A reasonable time limit for the second criminal trial can not only ensure that the public security and judicial organs punish and crack down on the criminals in a timely and accurate manner and restore the social relations destroyed by the criminal acts, but also effectively prevent the accused from being detained indefinitely. Guarantee its legal rights and interests, and then maintain the balance between punishing crime and protecting human rights, and realize procedural justice and substantive justice. And the trial time limit system can realize the litigation efficiency to the maximum extent. By setting a time limit for the behavior of judicial organs, the system of criminal second instance aims to urge the public security judicial organs to complete their litigation acts as soon as possible, to prevent litigation delay and excessive detention, and then to make full use of the limited litigation resources. However, in practice, there are several cases in the hands of each person handling the case in the judicial organ, and some cases have similar deadlines. In order to complete the task and pursue the so-called "efficiency", some investigators will inevitably perfunctory, leading to the hasty conclusion of the case. Which prevents justice from being done. Therefore, the criminal second instance judge must firmly establish the concept of justice and efficiency. Justice and efficiency are the goal of criminal procedure and the starting point and destination of criminal second instance procedure. The time limit of the second criminal trial is directly related to the efficiency of the second instance, but the premise is that the fairness of the second instance, including substantive justice and procedural justice, must be ensured. Therefore, the proper extension of the trial period of some criminal cases of second instance is conducive to correctly handling the relationship between justice and efficiency, so that the judges can follow the basic principle of "justice first, giving consideration to efficiency", and on the premise of safeguarding the judicial justice of the second instance, It is true to abide by the legal time limit of the second instance and improve the efficiency of the second instance case handling. Although the system of the second instance of criminal trial has been established systematically in our country, there are still many problems and deficiencies in the judicial practice of the system, and the problem of the hidden deadline of trial still occurs from time to time. This not only damaged the judicial authority, but also violated the legitimate interests of the parties. Therefore, on the basis of amending and perfecting the legislation of the second instance period system, we should strengthen the relevant theoretical cognition and perfect the relevant supporting measures, so that all the criminal second instance cases can be concluded within the legal time limit. Ensure a high degree of unity between fairness and efficiency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 程英華;;審判委員會制度存在的必要性[J];法制與社會;2011年03期

2 楊翔;谷國艷;;審理期限制度淺析[J];時代法學(xué);2006年02期

3 王巖華;王立國;;刑事審限:功能、問題及破解思路[J];理論探索;2011年03期

4 陳衛(wèi)東;;改革30年中國司法之回顧與前瞻[J];人民司法;2009年01期

5 曾新華;;論刑事二審審理期限制度的改革[J];人民司法;2011年13期

6 王樹嶺;芻議審限的價值及正確運用[J];山東審判;2001年02期

7 趙新燕;趙偉初;;論我國刑事審限制度價值之實現(xiàn)[J];中國商界(下半月);2009年06期

8 沈言;潘庸魯;;我國刑事訴訟法一審普通程序法定審限問題檢討[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年06期

，

本文編號：2025446