本文選題：非法人團(tuán)體 + 訴訟主體資格��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在民事訴訟中，主體若欲通過訴訟的手段解決糾紛，其必須具備民事訴訟主體資格，其才得以啟動(dòng)民事訴訟程序。關(guān)于業(yè)主委員會(huì)、合伙、鐵路段（站）等非法人團(tuán)體的訴訟主體資格問題困擾著國內(nèi)的司法實(shí)踐。大陸法系的德國、日本、以及我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)關(guān)于非法人團(tuán)體的訴訟主體資格問題的研究比我國大陸地區(qū)更加深入，其立法也對(duì)該問題給與了不同程度的回應(yīng)。觀之我國，該問題的研究就沒有那么深刻、細(xì)致。本文運(yùn)用分析、比較和理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際的方法，來論證非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格的相關(guān)問題，以求厘清非法人團(tuán)體享有訴訟主體資格的理論支撐和現(xiàn)實(shí)需要，為新型主體的訴訟法律地位的地位提供支撐，為完善我國非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格制度提出相關(guān)建議。 本文一共四個(gè)部分：本著提出問題、分析問題、解決問題的思路探討非法人團(tuán)體的訴訟主體資格問題。 第一部分：問題之提出。在民事訴訟中，得以起訴和被訴的前提是該主體享有民事訴訟主體資格。非法人團(tuán)體首先在稱謂、外延方面有諸多爭議，在對(duì)其予以論證之后才能展開對(duì)其主體資格進(jìn)行考察。觀之域外法系該理論的發(fā)展歷程，，梳理非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格從無到有，從片面到全面享有的理論和實(shí)踐探討歷程，為非法人團(tuán)體享有訴訟主體尋求基石。 第二部分：非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格要件的考察。通過對(duì)相關(guān)國家、地區(qū)的非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格要件的考察，并結(jié)合我國大陸地區(qū)非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格要件的現(xiàn)狀，歸納出享有訴訟主體資格的非法人團(tuán)體的構(gòu)成要件，以期為后文完善該制度提供理論支撐。 第三部分：海峽兩岸非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格類型化比較研究。試圖通過對(duì)應(yīng)且具體的比較研究尋找我國該制度存在的問題，以及臺(tái)灣地區(qū)先進(jìn)的學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)和司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)以進(jìn)一步完善我國非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格制度的不足。 第四部分：非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格制度之完善。梳理我國立法、司法以及理論上該問題的現(xiàn)狀，結(jié)合上文的理論分析、比較研究結(jié)論為我國非法人團(tuán)體訴訟主體資格制度的完善提供理論和立法上的若干建議。
[Abstract]:In civil litigation, the subject, if it wants to solve the dispute through the means of litigation, must have the qualification of the main body of civil litigation, and it can start the civil procedure. The subject qualification of the non legal body of the owners' committee, the partnership, the railway section (station) and other non legal bodies plague the domestic judicial practice. The German, Japanese, and me of the continental law system The research on the subject qualification of the illegal person group in Taiwan is more deep than that of the mainland of China, and its legislation also gives a different degree of response to the problem. The study of this problem is not so profound and meticulous in our country. This paper uses the method of analysis, comparison and theory to connect the reality to demonstrate the illegal group. In order to clarify the theoretical support and practical needs of the non legal body group, it provides support for the status of the legal status of the new subject, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the qualification system of the non legal body litigation body in our country.
This article consists of four parts: in the light of the idea of asking questions, analyzing problems and solving problems, we discuss the subject qualification of non legal entity.
The first part: the question is put forward. In civil litigation, the premise of being able to prosecute and be prosecuted is that the subject is entitled to the subject of civil litigation. There are many disputes in the aspect of appellation and extension. The course of theoretical and practical discussion from one-sided to full enjoyment is the cornerstone for non legal body groups to enjoy the subject of litigation.
The second part: the investigation of the qualification requirements of the non legal body group litigation subject. Through the investigation of the qualification requirements of the non legal body litigation subject in the relevant countries and the region, and combining the status quo of the qualifications of the subject qualification of the illegal groups in the mainland of China, the constitutive requirements of the non legal body groups enjoying the qualification of the litigation subject are concluded, with a view to the latter. The paper provides theoretical support for the improvement of the system.
The third part: the comparative study on the typization of the subject qualification of non legal body groups on both sides of the Taiwan Straits, trying to find out the existing problems in our country through the corresponding and specific comparative study, as well as the advanced academic views and judicial practice experience of the Taiwan region to further improve the deficiency of the qualification system of the body of illegal people in our country.
The fourth part: the improvement of the subject qualification system of the non legal body group litigation subject, combing the status of the legislation, judicature and theory of our country, combining the theoretical analysis of the above, and comparing the conclusion of the study to provide some theoretical and legislative suggestions for the improvement of the qualification system of the non legal entity litigation subject in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 陳賢貴;;業(yè)主委員會(huì)訴訟主體地位之構(gòu)筑——從物權(quán)法第七十八條和第八十三條規(guī)定談起[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2009年Z1期

2 肖建華;訴權(quán)與實(shí)體權(quán)利主體相分離的類型化分析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年01期

3 石志恒;;論合伙的當(dāng)事人能力[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年02期

4 季俊強(qiáng);;簡論業(yè)主委員會(huì)的訴訟主體資格——基于立法和司法解釋對(duì)此問題的反復(fù)不定[J];改革與開放;2010年12期

5 趙虎林;;談非法人團(tuán)體的訴訟主體資格[J];法律學(xué)習(xí)與研究;1989年01期

6 ;衛(wèi)勤儉訴中保財(cái)產(chǎn)保險(xiǎn)有限公司臺(tái)山市支公司、中國農(nóng)業(yè)銀行臺(tái)山市支行下川營業(yè)所漁船保險(xiǎn)合同糾紛案[J];中華人民共和國最高人民法院公報(bào);2001年03期

7 楊微波;;論設(shè)立中公司應(yīng)當(dāng)具有訴訟當(dāng)事人資格[J];佳木斯大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

8 楊德文;;完善我國業(yè)主委員會(huì)訴訟主體資格的立法建議[J];中國市場(chǎng);2010年40期

9 李德飛;;我國訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)制度中既判力主觀范圍的擴(kuò)張[J];司法改革論評(píng);2009年00期

本文編號(hào)：2002227