本文選題：刑事司法解釋 + 證明簡化　； 參考：兼論司法解釋制度的完善及其與案例指導(dǎo)制度的功能劃分與銜接

【摘要】：刑事司法解釋在解釋立法、統(tǒng)一法律適用的同時創(chuàng)設(shè)了一批旨在指導(dǎo)個案事實認定的抽象規(guī)則。刑事司法解釋中的事實認定規(guī)則客觀上導(dǎo)致了"證明簡化"的后果,對控辯平等原則造成沖擊,因而其正當性存疑。刑事司法解釋中的證明簡化對控辯平等原則的沖擊是當前司法解釋運行實踐偏離該制度功能定位的典型反映。為協(xié)調(diào)解釋立法與指導(dǎo)個案之間的關(guān)系,應(yīng)當進一步完善司法解釋制度,并使其與案例指導(dǎo)制度形成功能上的劃分與銜接。
[Abstract]:While interpreting the legislation and unifying the application of the law, the criminal judicial interpretation creates a number of abstract rules aimed at guiding the determination of facts in individual cases. The rule of factual cognizance in criminal judicial interpretation objectively leads to the consequence of "proof simplification", which impacts the principle of equality of prosecution and defense, and therefore its legitimacy is doubtful. The impact of proof simplification in criminal judicial interpretation on the principle of equality of prosecution and defense is a typical reflection of the deviation from the functional orientation of the system in the current practice of judicial interpretation. In order to coordinate the relationship between the interpretation of legislation and the guiding cases, the judicial interpretation system should be further improved, and the division and connection between the function of the judicial interpretation system and the case guidance system should be made.
【作者單位】： 山東大學法學院;
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫耀霖;我國司法解釋的功能和意義[J];安陽師專學報;2000年01期

2 喬燕;司法解釋體制:改革與重新定位——關(guān)于中國司法解釋現(xiàn)狀的對話[J];法律適用;2000年07期

3 賈平;我國司法解釋存在的問題及對策[J];燕山大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2000年03期

4 劉桂明;誰來解釋司法解釋 在現(xiàn)實與理想之間[J];中國律師;2000年07期

5 羅書平;中國司法解釋的現(xiàn)狀與法律思考[J];中國律師;2000年07期

6 董v，

本文編號：1975566