本文選題：證據 + 證據收集��； 參考：《廣東財經大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文在現(xiàn)有的研究基礎上，以當事人收集證據的程式為中心展開對民事訴訟當事人證據收集的剖析，試圖以一種理想的樣式呈現(xiàn)收集證據的應然面相。通過結合司法實踐的案例，從證據收集的指涉客體——證據種類入手，分析收集證據的一般程式和特殊程式，并就如何保障運作提出完善的建議。 除前言和結語外，正文共由四部分組成，具體結構如下： 第一章：民事訴訟證據收集的畛域。本章運用訴訟方法論對民事訴訟證據種類進行探討，在指出我國證據種類立法模式給證據收集帶來實踐困境的同時就如何完善提出改進的意見。 第二章：民事訴訟當事人證據收集的一般程式。以證據收集程式內在機理的梳理為基礎，針對不同的取證對象，進行考察分析，并就如何完善向對方當事人、證人、第三人收集證據的程序提出建議。 第三章：民事訴訟當事人證據收集的特殊程式。以需要法院介入才能產生啟動程序的效果為標準，將當事人向法院申請調查取證、申請證據保全、通過證據交換發(fā)現(xiàn)證據界定為民事訴訟當事人證據收集的特殊程式，并試圖擴充其證據收集的功能。 第四章：民事訴訟當事人證據收集的保障。一方面探索保障當事人證據收集程序運作的措施，另一方面，關注取證對象合法權益的保障。首次提出在法院建立征信系統(tǒng)，，將不配合證據收集的個人或單位的信息進行采集和整理，作為其涉訟并向法院申請調查取證，法院裁量是否準予申請的因素。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the existing research, this paper takes the procedure of collecting evidence as the center to analyze the collection of evidence in civil litigation, and tries to present the face of collecting evidence in an ideal way. Based on the case of judicial practice, this paper analyzes the general and special procedures of evidence collection from the point of view of the object involved in evidence collection-the types of evidence, and puts forward some suggestions on how to ensure the operation of evidence collection. In addition to the preface and conclusion, the text is composed of four parts, the specific structure is as follows: Chapter one: the field of evidence collection in civil proceedings. This chapter probes into the types of evidence in civil litigation by means of litigation methodology, and points out that the legislative model of evidence types in our country has brought practical difficulties to the collection of evidence, and at the same time puts forward some suggestions on how to improve it. Chapter two: the general procedure of evidence collection in civil litigation. On the basis of combing the internal mechanism of evidence collection program, this paper investigates and analyzes different evidential objects, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the procedure of collecting evidence from the other party, witness and third party. Chapter three: the special procedure for collecting evidence in civil litigation. Based on the criterion that court intervention is required to produce the effect of initiating proceedings, the parties concerned are defined as a special procedure for collecting evidence in civil litigation by applying to the court for investigation and evidence preservation, and for the discovery of evidence through evidence exchange. And attempts to expand its evidence collection function. Chapter IV: the protection of the collection of evidence by the parties in civil proceedings. On the one hand, it explores the measures to ensure the operation of the party's evidence-gathering procedure, on the other hand, pays attention to the protection of the lawful rights and interests of the object. It is proposed for the first time to set up a credit system in the court to collect and organize the information of individuals or units that do not cooperate with the evidence collection as a factor of litigating and applying to the court to investigate and obtain evidence, and whether the court can grant the application or not.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.13

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 許少波;;民事訴訟證據交換制度的立法探討[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2012年03期

2 羅納德·J·艾倫;蔣雨佳;強卉;張姝麗;;證明責任[J];證據科學;2012年05期

3 李浩;民事證據法的目的[J];法學研究;2004年05期

4 龍宗智;證據分類制度及其改革[J];法學研究;2005年05期

5 許少波;;證據保全制度的功能及其擴大化[J];法學研究;2009年01期

6 朱新林;;論當事人證據收集權的程序保障[J];法學論壇;2012年05期

7 徐昕;;法官為什么不相信證人? 證人在轉型中國司法過程中的作用[J];中外法學;2006年03期

8 熊躍敏;日本新民事訴訟法中的當事人照會制度介評[J];政治與法律;2002年02期

本文編號：1971158