本文選題：民事訴訟和解 + 當(dāng)事人合意　； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)逐步發(fā)展的過程中,民事糾紛的數(shù)量急劇增加,此外,民眾的法律意識與權(quán)利訴求更是愈發(fā)強(qiáng)烈。因此,當(dāng)事人的合意也就顯得更加重要,建立與之相適應(yīng)的訴訟和解制度也就極為重要。 民事訴訟和解制度強(qiáng)調(diào)合意解決糾紛,無論在英美法系國家還是大陸法系國家的糾紛解決過程中,都發(fā)揮著不可替代的積極功能。縱觀我國整個民事訴訟法律體系,關(guān)于民事訴訟和解的規(guī)定是少之又少。我國《民事訴訟法》僅在第50條規(guī)定,當(dāng)事人可自行和解,相關(guān)司法解釋中相關(guān)內(nèi)容的規(guī)范同樣十分粗略；在司法實(shí)踐當(dāng)中,由于缺少相關(guān)法律規(guī)范的規(guī)制,民事訴訟和解制度缺乏可操作性,對民事訴訟和解的實(shí)現(xiàn)產(chǎn)生了極大的制約。 本文即從民事訴訟和解制度理論問題的探討入手,結(jié)合域外相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn),總結(jié)提出筆者觀點(diǎn),希望可以為我國建立民事訴訟和解制度盡綿薄之力。 具體言之,本文正文共分為四個部分：第一部分,介紹了民事訴訟和解制度的基本理論,這些基礎(chǔ)理論的辨析都為下文梳理了思路,奠定了基礎(chǔ)；第二部分,域外相關(guān)制度的考察；第三部分,闡述我國民事訴訟和解制度的現(xiàn)狀,并分析其之所以不完善的制度性內(nèi)因；最后重點(diǎn)論述了關(guān)于我國訴訟審判和解制度完善的建議：應(yīng)該重在尊重當(dāng)事人的意思自治；“和解協(xié)議書”的“訴訟契約”本質(zhì)屬性應(yīng)被重視。此外,為了保證當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)的事實(shí)上的行使,還需明確訴訟審判中和解的法律效力、完善和解協(xié)議瑕疵的救濟(jì)途徑、其他配套相關(guān)制度的完善等等。
[Abstract]:In the process of the development of market economy, the number of civil disputes increases sharply, in addition, the people's legal consciousness and right demand are more and more intense. Therefore, the agreement of the parties is more important, and it is extremely important to establish the corresponding litigation settlement system. The settlement system of civil action emphasizes the consensual settlement of disputes, which plays an irreplaceable positive role in the process of dispute settlement in both Anglo-American and continental law countries. Throughout the legal system of civil litigation in our country, there are very few provisions on the settlement of civil proceedings. The Civil procedure Law of our country only stipulates in Article 50 that the parties concerned may reconcile themselves, and the relevant contents of the relevant judicial interpretation are also very rough; in judicial practice, due to the lack of the regulation of relevant legal norms, The lack of maneuverability of the civil litigation reconciliation system has greatly restricted the realization of the civil litigation reconciliation. This article begins with the discussion of the theory of the settlement system of civil action, combining with the relevant experience of foreign countries, summarizes and puts forward the author's viewpoint, hoping that it can contribute to the establishment of the system of reconciliation of civil action in our country. Specifically, the text of this paper is divided into four parts: the first part, introduced the basic theory of civil litigation reconciliation system, the discrimination of these basic theories for the following combing ideas, laid the foundation; the second part, The third part expounds the present situation of the reconciliation system of civil action in China, and analyzes the internal causes of its imperfection. In the end, the author puts emphasis on the suggestions of perfecting the system of litigation trial and reconciliation in our country: the emphasis should be placed on respecting the autonomy of the parties' will, and the essential attribute of the "litigation contract" of the "settlement agreement" should be attached importance to. In addition, in order to ensure the parties'de facto exercise of the right of disposition, it is also necessary to clarify the legal effect of reconciliation in litigation, to improve the remedies for the defects of the settlement agreement, and to improve other supporting related systems, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 齊樹潔;;臺灣地區(qū)民事訴訟制度改革述評[J];法治研究;2011年06期

，

本文編號：1946628