本文選題：小額訴訟 + 立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)　； 參考：《浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前,我國(guó)《民事訴訟法》第162條已對(duì)小額案件的審理作出規(guī)定,然而僅一條制度性規(guī)定明顯存在著缺陷,其對(duì)有關(guān)小額訴訟制度的立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、當(dāng)事人的程序選擇權(quán)以及救濟(jì)機(jī)制等問題并未進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)性的構(gòu)建,并且對(duì)于上訴問題也僅在簡(jiǎn)易程序中作出禁止上訴的特別規(guī)定,整個(gè)制度規(guī)定與國(guó)外的制度相比還非常簡(jiǎn)陋,不足以解決實(shí)踐中遇到的細(xì)節(jié)性問題,故不是完整意義上的小額訴訟制度。本文主要從七部分進(jìn)行闡述,第一部分對(duì)小額訴訟的概念進(jìn)行評(píng)析,第二部分介紹了建立小額訴訟制度的價(jià)值基礎(chǔ),第三部分從域外小額訴訟制度的規(guī)定中總結(jié)出經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),為我國(guó)的制度構(gòu)建做基奠。第四部分在對(duì)我國(guó)小額訴訟制度進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)后,提出立法機(jī)關(guān)和司法機(jī)關(guān)在制度構(gòu)建上的態(tài)度差異,并對(duì)小額訴訟的立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、適用對(duì)象、程序選擇以及程序轉(zhuǎn)換等內(nèi)容予以明確。第五部分與第六部分緊密聯(lián)系,前者為后者做鋪墊,在第五部分在將立法模式確定為禁止上訴為主、程序分化為輔的基礎(chǔ)上,將立法完善的內(nèi)容納入到第六部分里。第六部分也是全文的核心內(nèi)容,提出了完善小額訴訟制度的構(gòu)想,分別從起訴、審理、裁決、救濟(jì)等方面對(duì)小額訴訟制度進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)性的構(gòu)建,強(qiáng)調(diào)保障當(dāng)事人救濟(jì)權(quán)利的重要性。從我國(guó)小額訴訟發(fā)展的總體趨勢(shì)來看,完善小額訴訟制度的重心應(yīng)轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)ι鲜鰡栴}的展開,這樣既能更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)小額訴訟的價(jià)值,又符合我國(guó)國(guó)情的設(shè)計(jì)。總之,完善小額訴訟制度最關(guān)鍵的要先從思想上對(duì)小額訴訟制度予以重視,對(duì)小額訴訟制度有一個(gè)理性的、正確的認(rèn)識(shí)。其次,嚴(yán)格按照立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)適用小額訴訟程序,在審判的過程中要對(duì)訴訟程序進(jìn)行必要的簡(jiǎn)化,最后,救濟(jì)機(jī)制不但要針對(duì)小額訴訟程序的特點(diǎn)建立,而且要真正保障當(dāng)事人的救濟(jì)權(quán),實(shí)現(xiàn)救濟(jì)機(jī)制的目的。在今后的制度改革中,應(yīng)出臺(tái)相應(yīng)的司法解釋,甚至在《民事訴訟法》中進(jìn)一步修改小額訴訟制度,使其真正實(shí)現(xiàn)高效、便捷的內(nèi)在價(jià)值,更好地為司法實(shí)踐服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:At present, Article 162 of the Civil procedure Law of our country has provided for the hearing of minor cases. However, there is only one provision in the system that has obvious defects. The procedural option and relief mechanism of the parties have not been systematically constructed, and the appeal issue is only in summary procedure to make a special provision forbidding appeal, the whole system provisions are very simple compared with the foreign system. It is not enough to solve the detailed problems encountered in practice, so it is not a complete system of small claims. The first part analyzes the concept of small claims litigation, the second part introduces the value basis of the establishment of small claims litigation system, the third part summarizes the experience and lessons from the provisions of the extraterritorial small claims system. It is the foundation for the construction of our country's system. The fourth part puts forward the differences in attitude between the legislature and the judicial organs in the construction of the system after the evaluation of the small claims system in China, and puts forward the standards and applicable objects for filing the small claims. Program selection and program conversion and other content to be clear. The fifth part is closely connected with the sixth part, the former makes the foundation for the latter, and in the fifth part, on the basis of defining the legislative model as the prohibition of appeal and the differentiation of the procedure, the content of the legislative perfection is brought into the sixth part. The sixth part is also the core content of the full text, put forward the concept of perfecting the small claims litigation system, respectively from the prosecution, trial, adjudication, relief and other aspects of the small claims system of systematic construction, The importance of protecting the right of the parties to remedy is emphasized. From the general trend of the development of small claims litigation in China, the focus of perfecting the system of small claims should be shifted to the development of the above problems, so that the value of small claims can be better realized and the design in line with the national conditions of our country. In a word, the most important thing to perfect the system of small claims is to attach importance to it ideologically and to have a rational and correct understanding of it. Secondly, the small claims procedure should be applied strictly in accordance with the standard of filing the case, and the procedure should be simplified in the course of trial. Finally, the relief mechanism should not only be established according to the characteristics of the small claims procedure, Moreover, the relief right of the parties should be guaranteed and the purpose of the relief mechanism should be realized. In the system reform in the future, the corresponding judicial explanation should be introduced, and even the minor lawsuit system should be further revised in the Civil procedure Law, so that it can truly realize the intrinsic value of efficiency and convenience, and serve the judicial practice better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬強(qiáng);;美國(guó)小額法庭制度與借鑒[J];比較法研究;2011年05期

2 黃娟;;論我國(guó)小額訴訟程序的模式選擇[J];長(zhǎng)沙鐵道學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

3 熊躍敏;日本民事訴訟中的小額訴訟程序概述──兼論我國(guó)小額訴訟程序的構(gòu)建[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年05期

4 許尚豪;朱呈義;;我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)小額訴訟程序述評(píng)及啟示[J];法律適用;2006年09期

5 范愉;;司法資源供求失衡的悖論與對(duì)策 以小額訴訟為切入點(diǎn)[J];法律適用;2011年03期

6 范愉;;世界司法改革的潮流、趨勢(shì)與中國(guó)的民事審判方式改革[J];法學(xué)家;1998年02期

7 歐廣遠(yuǎn);張林海;;糾紛多元解決視角下的小額訴訟程序建構(gòu)研究[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2010年11期

8 廖中洪;;小額訴訟立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與受理規(guī)則比較研究——兼論我國(guó)小額訴訟程序的立法完善[J];法治研究;2012年09期

9 劉仲屹;王保民;;小額訴訟程序及其在我國(guó)民事訴訟法修改中的完善[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

10 程曉雪;齊樹潔;;歐洲小額訴訟程序:規(guī)則與實(shí)踐[J];法治研究;2013年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1942257