本文選題：委托代理理論 + 司法地方化�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：為優(yōu)化司法職權(quán)配置,我國提出設(shè)立最高人民法院巡回法庭。然而,巡回法庭制度的構(gòu)建應(yīng)遵循怎樣的理論預(yù)設(shè)?其職能如何定位?其與最高人民法院之間的關(guān)系如何?如何防止巡回法庭偏離該制度設(shè)計(jì)的初衷?如何才能確保巡回法庭真正按照最高人民法院的意志行事?這一系列的問題的回答,關(guān)乎巡回法庭制度的科學(xué)構(gòu)建與巡回法庭的良性運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)。本文在將最高人民法院與巡回法庭之間的關(guān)系定位為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)意義上的委托代理的關(guān)系的前提下,詳細(xì)檢討了我國現(xiàn)行巡回法庭制度的功能偏差與制度錯位,并以英國巡回法庭制度的經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒與教訓(xùn)汲取為基礎(chǔ),提出了完善我國巡回法庭制度的意見和建議。全文除引言和結(jié)語外,分為四個部分:第一部分,最高法院與巡回法庭相互關(guān)系的應(yīng)然定位。委托人和代理人之間存在非一致目的和非對稱信息,代理人可能存在逆向選擇和道德風(fēng)險等偏離委托人目的的行為,委托人的任務(wù)是設(shè)計(jì)最優(yōu)契約以激勵、約束代理人,使代理人從自身目的出發(fā)采取行動實(shí)現(xiàn)委托人目的最大化。理論層面而言,最高法院和巡回法庭應(yīng)是委托代理關(guān)系,委托代理問題不可不防控。第二部分,我國巡回法庭制度的功能偏差與制度錯位。我國巡回法庭制度的功能偏差在于,現(xiàn)行巡回法庭制度的實(shí)然功能設(shè)定偏離巡回法庭制度在功能欲求上的應(yīng)然定位。我國巡回法庭制度的制度錯位集中體現(xiàn)為現(xiàn)行制度之設(shè)計(jì)存在激勵不足和監(jiān)督乏力的弊端。第三部分,英國巡回法庭制度委托代理問題治理簡析。英國巡回法庭制度為我國巡回法庭制度提供的經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒主要是信任機(jī)制治理方式、約束機(jī)制、競爭作為激勵方式得以運(yùn)用。教訓(xùn)帶來的啟發(fā)則是委托人不能忽視委托代理關(guān)系的外在影響因素,要對代理人目的沖突進(jìn)行防控。第四部分,我國巡回法庭制度的完善進(jìn)路。本部分以委托代理理論為指導(dǎo),以委托代理問題防控為重點(diǎn)。在英國巡回法庭制度運(yùn)作經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒與教訓(xùn)吸納的基礎(chǔ)上,通過物質(zhì)激勵、職業(yè)保障和聲譽(yù)激勵等激勵機(jī)制的構(gòu)建,同體監(jiān)督的強(qiáng)化、公民監(jiān)督的完善、媒體監(jiān)督的規(guī)范等約束機(jī)制的完善,提出了我國巡回法庭制度完善的意見和建議。
[Abstract]:In order to optimize the allocation of judicial power, our country has set up the circuit court of the Supreme People's court. However, how should the construction of the circuit court follow the theoretical presupposition? How does its function be located? How is the relationship with the Supreme People's court? How to prevent the circuit court from being deviated from the design of the system and how to ensure that the circuit court is true In accordance with the will of the Supreme People's court, the answer to this series of questions is about the scientific construction of the circuit court system and the benign operation of the circuit court. This article reviews the current tour of our country on the premise of positioning the relationship between the Supreme People's court and the circuit court as the principal agent relationship in the economic sense. On the basis of the experience and lessons learned from the British circuit court system, the paper puts forward some suggestions and suggestions to improve the system of the circuit court in China. The full text is divided into four parts, in addition to the introduction and conclusion: the first part, the relationship between the Supreme Court and the circuit court should be located. There is an uncongruent and asymmetric information between the agent and the agent. The agent may have the behavior of deviating from the principal's purpose, such as adverse selection and moral hazard. The task of the principal is to design the optimal contract to encourage and restrain the agent, so that the agent can maximize the purpose of realizing the principal from its own purpose. The Supreme Court and the circuit court should be the principal-agent relationship, the principal-agent problem can not be prevented and controlled. The second part, the functional deviation and the system dislocation of the circuit court system in China. The functional deviation of our circuit court system lies in the fact that the actual function of the current circuit court system deviates from the circuit court system in the functional desire. Positioning. The dislocation of the system of the circuit court of our country is concentrated on the shortcomings of the lack of incentive and lack of supervision in the design of the current system. In the third part, a brief analysis on the governance of the principal-agent problem of the British circuit court system. The experience of the British circuit court system for our circuit court system is mainly the way of governance of the trust mechanism, Restriction mechanism, competition is used as an incentive mode. The inspiration of the lesson is that the principal can not ignore the external influence factors of the principal agent relationship and prevent and control the agent's purpose conflict. The fourth part, the perfect approach of the circuit court system of our country. This part is guided by the principal-agent theory and the principal-agent problem prevention and control. On the basis of the experience and lessons learned from the British circuit court system, through the construction of incentive mechanisms such as material incentives, occupational security and reputation incentives, the strengthening of the supervision of the androgyny, the perfection of the supervision of the citizens, the standardization of media supervision, the perfect opinions and construction of the circuit court system in China have been put forward. Argumentative.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 劉貴祥;;巡回法庭改革的理念與實(shí)踐[J];法律適用;2015年07期

2 蘇鏡祥;;什么是最高人民法院巡回法庭?[J];理論視野;2015年04期

3 劉貴祥;胡云騰;;巡回法庭:司法改革的“排頭兵”——專訪最高人民法院第一、第二巡回法庭庭長[J];中國法律評論;2015年01期

4 顧永忠;;最高人民法院設(shè)立巡回法庭之我見[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2015年02期

5 縱博;;最高人民法院巡回法庭的設(shè)立背景、功能及設(shè)計(jì)構(gòu)想[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2015年02期

6 方斯遠(yuǎn);;最高人民法院巡回法庭的制度建構(gòu)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2015年02期

7 王吟;;對最高人民法院設(shè)立巡回法庭問題的思考[J];南陽理工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年01期

8 傅郁林;;最高人民法院巡回法庭的職能定位與權(quán)威形成[J];中國法律評論;2014年04期

9 王鳳山;;我國巡回審判制度及最高法院設(shè)立巡回法庭相關(guān)問題之建議[J];中國律師;2014年12期

10 習(xí)近平;;關(guān)于《中共中央關(guān)于全面推進(jìn)依法治國若干重大問題的決定》的說明[J];共產(chǎn)黨員(河北);2014年21期

中國重要報紙全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 賀小榮;何帆;馬淵杰;;《最高人民法院關(guān)于巡回法庭審理案件若干問題的規(guī)定》的理解與適用[N];人民法院報;2015年

，

本文編號：1941183