本文選題：民事訴權 + 訴訟外調(diào)解　； 參考：《中國青年政治學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：調(diào)解制度本是社會救濟的一種,將其融入公力救濟之中成為民事訴訟調(diào)解制度是我國的司法創(chuàng)新。但是這種制度創(chuàng)新是否具有法理上的合理性,是否損害糾紛當事人的訴訟權益?很多學者都對民事訴訟調(diào)解制度進行過反思和批評,但是在筆者看來這些論證似乎都沒能切中要害。大部分學者認為這一制度是合理的,只不過在制度設計上存在各種技術缺陷而已。也有學者認識到民事訴訟調(diào)解制度違背了民事訴訟規(guī)律,但究竟違背了民事訴訟什么規(guī)律,只能從各個方面和角度泛泛而談,涉及不到民事訴訟的根本規(guī)律,這樣的論證無法從根本上說明民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的不合理。本文從民事訴權角度出發(fā),認為民事訴訟調(diào)解制度違背民事訴訟法的最高目標——民事訴權保障。對于這一觀點的論證需要進行理論上的探討分析以及比較法方面的研究,通過對民事訴權理論進行梳理,以民事訴權為視角從本質(zhì)上探討民事裁判制度和訴訟外民事調(diào)解制度的異質(zhì)性,并進而說明民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的存在是對民事訴權的傷害,是不合理的民事糾紛解決機制。在此基礎上筆者對我國的民事訴訟調(diào)解制度提出自己的看法:民事訴訟調(diào)解制度作為我國人民法院處理民事糾紛的傳統(tǒng)方式有其特定的歷史意義,但是隨著我國法治建設進程,法律體系的日益健全和完善,民事訴訟調(diào)解制度在本質(zhì)上是對民事訴權的背離這一事實愈加突出和明顯。民事訴訟調(diào)解制度是一種不合理的民事糾紛解決機制,進而應當逐步將民事訴訟調(diào)解制度取消,將訴訟外民事調(diào)解制度和民事裁判制度獨立開來,建立起二者獨立且良好銜接的新的民事糾紛解決機制。
[Abstract]:The mediation system is a kind of social relief. It is the judicial innovation of our country to integrate it into the civil litigation mediation system. But whether this kind of system innovation has the legal rationality, whether damages the litigant rights and interests of the dispute party? Many scholars have introspected and criticized the mediation system of civil action, but in the author's opinion, these arguments seem to have failed to reach the point. Most scholars believe that the system is reasonable, but there are various technical defects in the system design. Some scholars have also realized that the mediation system of civil action violates the law of civil action, but what law of civil action is violated can only be discussed extensively from various aspects and angles, which does not involve the fundamental law of civil action. This argument can not fundamentally explain the unreasonable civil litigation mediation system. From the point of view of civil litigation right, this paper holds that the mediation system of civil action violates the supreme goal of civil procedural law-the protection of civil litigation right. The argumentation of this viewpoint needs to be discussed and analyzed theoretically and the comparative law should be studied, and the theory of civil right of action should be combed out. From the angle of view of civil litigation right, this paper discusses the heterogeneity of civil adjudication system and non-litigation civil mediation system in essence, and further explains that the existence of civil litigation mediation system is the harm to civil litigation right and the unreasonable civil dispute settlement mechanism. On this basis, the author puts forward his own views on the mediation system of civil litigation in our country: the mediation system of civil action, as a traditional way for the people's court to deal with civil disputes, has its special historical significance, but with the process of the construction of the rule of law in our country, With the improvement and perfection of the legal system, the fact that the mediation system of civil action is essentially deviating from the right of civil action is becoming more and more prominent and obvious. The mediation system of civil action is a kind of unreasonable civil dispute resolution mechanism, which should be gradually abolished, and the civil mediation system and the civil adjudication system should be independent. Establish a new civil dispute settlement mechanism which is independent and well connected.
【學位授予單位】：中國青年政治學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.14

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 任瑞興;;價值訴求與制度考量:當前我國訴權研究之省思[J];當代法學;2010年04期

2 姜麗萍;;論我國民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的改革與發(fā)展[J];公民與法(法學版);2010年03期

3 湯維建;齊天宇;;漂移的中國民事調(diào)解制度[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

4 金福海;懲罰性賠償不宜納入我國民法典[J];煙臺大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年02期

，

本文編號：1932153