本文選題：檢察機關(guān) + 刑事被害人��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：全國人民代表大會2012年3月14日修改的《刑事訴訟法》（以下簡稱2012年《刑事訴訟法》）在條文中明確規(guī)定了尊重和保障人權(quán)，把尊重和保障人權(quán)提升到了一個前所未有的高度。然而，很長一段時間以來國內(nèi)的學者們更關(guān)心的是如何保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的權(quán)利，對刑事被害人的權(quán)利保障卻關(guān)注不多。不可否認的是，對刑事被害人進行有效的救助，無論是從貫徹司法為民的角度還是從給予刑事被害人實質(zhì)公正的角度來看，都可謂是意義深遠。在實踐之中，一些地方的檢察機關(guān)對刑事被害人救助作出了一些有益的探索與嘗試，但是在具體的操作中仍然有一些不足之處。因此十分有必要在實地調(diào)研發(fā)現(xiàn)問題的基礎(chǔ)上，有針對性地完善刑事被害人救助制度。 本文除前言和結(jié)語外，正文分為三部分，共二萬余字。 第一部分，Z市檢察機關(guān)刑事被害人救助工作的現(xiàn)狀。首先，筆者對Z市檢察機關(guān)開展刑事被害人救助總體情況進行了歸納，其中包含了2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年五年的情況，主要是對每年救助案件數(shù)，以及檢察機關(guān)主動救助和被害人申請救助案件數(shù)之間的比例等數(shù)據(jù)進行了歸納。其次，Z市檢察機關(guān)開展刑事被害人救助具體情況。在文章中，該情況筆者又分以下四個部分闡述：第一，救助的案件類別統(tǒng)計。為了分析問題方便筆者把Z市檢察機關(guān)刑事被害人救助案件的案件類別分為純粹涉人身犯罪、純粹涉財產(chǎn)犯罪、既涉人身又涉財產(chǎn)的犯罪，并分別進行了歸類統(tǒng)計。第二，救助案件的方式。方式中包括了現(xiàn)金救助、最低生活保障和辦理殘疾證以及其他救助等方式。第三，現(xiàn)金救助的標準�，F(xiàn)金救助的標準普遍偏低。第四，救助的地域差別。救助的地域差別很大。 第二部分，Z市檢察機關(guān)在刑事被害人救助工作中存在的問題。該部分主要是在第一部分調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù)的基礎(chǔ)上提出了Z市檢察機關(guān)在刑事被害人救助工作中存在的問題：首先，救助案件對象過窄且救助范圍劃分不細致，以致于影響了檢察機關(guān)救助職能的發(fā)揮，影響了救助效果。其次，救助方式較為單一，以現(xiàn)金救助為主，缺少其他救助措施，救助效果不佳。再次，救助程序不明確，延長了救助時間，難以保障其公平性。第四，救助資金不足且缺乏保障，有限的救助資金相對于龐大的救助人群來說無異于杯水車薪，救助資金不足已經(jīng)成為開展救助工作的瓶頸。 第三部分，完善檢察機關(guān)刑事被害人救助制度的建議。該部分在針對上述第二部分發(fā)現(xiàn)問題的基礎(chǔ)之上，有針對性的提出一些完善的建議。第一，確立救助原則，科學界定救助范圍。比如，及時救助原則、合理救助原則、公平公正原則等都應當成為檢察機關(guān)刑事被害人救助的基本原則。救助的范圍也應當涵蓋除刑事被害人之外的其他需要救助的人。第二，拓寬救助方式，展開多元化的救助。完善檢察機關(guān)刑事被害人救助的程序。首先，明確刑事被害人救助的條件。其次，對刑事被害人救助的方式，改變以單一資金救助為主的方式。第三，，完善救助程序，確保救助及時有效。完善檢察機關(guān)刑事被害人救助的流程，使流程的設計更加科學合理。第四，設置專項資金，充分保障檢察機關(guān)刑事被害人救助的資金來源。
[Abstract]:The code of criminal procedure amended by the National People's Congress in March 14, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the 2012 < Criminal Procedure Law >) clearly stipulates the respect and guarantee of human rights in the provisions, and the promotion of respect for and protection of human rights to an unprecedented level. However, for a long time, the scholars at home are more concerned about how to protect the crime. The rights of the suspects and the defendants are not much concerned about the rights of the criminal victims. It is undeniable that the effective assistance to the criminal victims is far-reaching. In practice, in practice, the procuratorial machines in some places. There are some useful explorations and attempts on the assistance of criminal victims, but there are still some shortcomings in the specific operation. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the system of criminal victim assistance on the basis of field investigation and investigation.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the text is divided into three parts, with a total of 20000 words.
The first part is the present situation of the rescue work of the criminal victims of the Z municipal procuratorial organs. First, the author sums up the general situation of the rescue of the criminal victims of the procuratorial organs of the city of Z, including the situation in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 for five years, mainly on the number of salvage cases per year, as well as the active assistance and victims of the procuratorial organs. The proportion of the number of cases for the application of the rescue cases is summarized. Secondly, the Z municipal procuratorial organs carry out the specific situation of the victim assistance. In the article, the author also divides the following four parts: first, the category statistics of the rescue cases. In order to analyze the problems, the criminal victims of the Z municipal procuratorial organs help the cases. The category of cases is divided into purely personal crimes, purely involving property crimes, involving crimes involving people and property, and classified statistics respectively. Second, the ways of rescuing cases include cash assistance, minimum living security and handling of disability certificates and other assistance. Third, the standard of cash assistance. The standard of cash assistance. It is generally low. Fourth, the geographical difference of relief. There is a great difference in the area of relief.
The second part, the problems existing in the rescue work of the criminal victims in the Z city. This part is mainly on the basis of the first part of the survey data, and puts forward the problems existing in the rescue work of the criminal victims of the municipal procuratorial organs of Z. First, the object of the rescue case is too narrow and the scope of the salvage is not meticulous, so that it affects the procuratorial work. The function of agency assistance has affected the effect of rescue. Secondly, the way of relief is relatively simple, with cash relief, lack of other assistance measures and poor effect. Again, the rescue procedure is not clear, the rescue time is prolonged, and it is difficult to guarantee its fairness. Fourth, the funds are insufficient and lack of security, limited aid funds relative to Pang. The large rescue population is nothing but a drop in the bucket. The lack of relief funds has become a bottleneck in the rescue work.
The third part, perfecting the proposal of the criminal victim assistance system of the procuratorial organs. On the basis of the above second parts, this part puts forward some perfect suggestions. First, establish the principle of salvation and scientifically define the scope of assistance. For example, the principle of timely assistance, the principle of reasonable assistance, the principle of fairness and justice, etc. When it becomes the basic principle of the assistance of the criminal victim of the procuratorial organ. The scope of the salvage should also cover other people in need of assistance except the criminal victims. Second, broaden the way of assistance, expand the pluralistic assistance and improve the procedure for the assistance of the criminal victims of the procuratorial organs. First, make clear the conditions for the assistance of the criminal victims. Secondly, to the punishment of the criminal victim. To change the way of victim assistance, change the way of single fund assistance. Third, improve the rescue procedure, ensure the timely and effective assistance, improve the process of the assistance of the criminal victims of the procuratorial organs, make the design of the process more scientific and reasonable. Fourth, set up special funds, and fully protect the source of funds for the assistance of the criminal victims of the procuratorial organs.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳瓊;孫洪坤;;論建立我國特困刑事被害人救助制度[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年01期

2 汪厚冬;;實踐VS理論:《無錫市刑事被害人特困救助條例》——論刑事被害人國家救濟制度之路徑選擇[J];研究生法學;2009年05期

3 湯嘯天;;論法律援助與司法救助制度的銜接[J];中國司法;2009年01期

4 楊飛;吳美來;;我國刑事被害人救助制度的審視與完善[J];法律適用;2011年08期

5 蔡霞;;刑事被害人國家救助制度初探[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2011年02期

6 楊志祥;;淺談檢察視角下刑事被害人的國家救助[J];法制與社會;2008年19期

7 薛麗婷;;從檢察角度分析刑事被害人救助制度的幾點思考[J];法制與社會;2011年27期

8 楊志坤;;關(guān)于開展刑事被害人救助的思考[J];法制與社會;2011年29期

9 張燕君;;刑事被害人國家救助制度研究——以檢察院實踐為視角[J];法制與社會;2011年33期

10 徐靜;;和諧社會完善司法——淺談刑事犯罪被害人國家救助制度[J];消費導刊;2009年24期

本文編號：1930722