本文選題：取保候審 + 保證人保證�。� 參考：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：取保候審保證人保證是指為保證刑事訴訟的順利進行，要求犯罪嫌疑人、被告人提供保證人，并由保證人出具保證書，保證犯罪嫌疑人、被告人不逃避和妨礙刑事訴訟的一項制度。作為取保候審保證方式之一，保證人保證對制約公權力，保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人權，實現(xiàn)訴訟經濟具有重要作用。但我國保證人保證存在諸多問題，導致其無法發(fā)揮應有作用。本文對取保候審保證人保證進行實證研究，目的在于發(fā)現(xiàn)其存在的問題，分析形成這些問題的原因，，并在借鑒域外成功經驗的基礎上，結合我國國情，提出完善我國保證人保證方式的具體設想。 本文分為四個主要部分： 第一部分是發(fā)現(xiàn)問題。通過對G市取保候審保證人保證的調研數(shù)據(jù)進行解析，同時為避免片面性，亦結合我國其它地區(qū)的情況，提出保證人保證在司法實踐中存在的問題，具體體現(xiàn)于以下幾個方面：一是取保候審總體適用比例不高；二是保證人保證適用比例較低；三是逃保、棄保現(xiàn)象較為頻繁；四是保證人的責任難以追究。這些問題影響保證人保證方式的具體適用，致使其無法發(fā)揮應有的制度功能。 第二部分是分析了形成前述問題的原因。保證人保證在實踐中存在的問題是多種原因合力而為�？傮w來看，既有司法機關執(zhí)法觀念存在偏差的內在束縛，也有現(xiàn)行法律存在缺陷和外來人員在涉案人員中占有一定比例的影響，還有缺乏取保候審所需要的完備監(jiān)管系統(tǒng)和較為完整的社會誠信機制。 第三部分分析了完善我國取保候審保證人保證的必要性。要想對某項制度進行完善，首先必然明晰對其完善的必要性，明確該項制度存在的價值基礎。筆者認為，該項制度存在價值基礎主要體現(xiàn)于以下幾個方面：一是尊重公民人身自由權利的體現(xiàn)；二是制約公權力濫用的重要舉措；三是利于實現(xiàn)訴訟經濟。 第四部分是完善舉措。筆者于文中運用比較研究方法，在借鑒域外保證人制度的成熟立法與實踐經驗的基礎上，從轉變理念、完善立法、設立監(jiān)管機制，加強誠信意識四個方面提出了完善我國取保候審保證人保證的具體舉措，以期能對此項制度發(fā)揮其充分作用有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In order to ensure the smooth progress of the criminal proceedings, the guarantor for obtaining bail pending trial is to require the criminal suspect and the defendant to provide the guarantor, and the guarantor shall issue a bond to guarantee the criminal suspect, A system in which the accused does not evade or obstruct criminal proceedings. As one of the ways of obtaining bail guarantee, guarantor guarantee plays an important role in restricting public power, protecting the human rights of criminal suspects and defendants, and realizing the economy of litigation. However, there are many problems in the guarantor guarantee in our country, which leads to its failure to play its due role. The purpose of this paper is to find out the existing problems, to analyze the causes of these problems, and to combine the situation of our country with the successful experience of foreign countries. Put forward the concrete idea of perfecting the way of surety guarantee in our country. This paper is divided into four main parts: The first part is the discovery of problems. In order to avoid one-sidedness and combine the situation of other regions of our country, this paper puts forward the problems of guarantor's guarantee in judicial practice by analyzing the investigation data of the guarantor's guarantee in G city, in order to avoid one-sidedness. Specifically reflected in the following aspects: first, the overall application ratio is not high; second, the guarantor guarantee application ratio is low; third, the phenomenon of evading the guarantee is more frequent; fourth, the guarantor's responsibility is difficult to investigate. These problems affect the concrete application of guarantor's guarantee mode and make it unable to play its proper system function. The second part is the analysis of the causes of the above-mentioned problems. The problem of guarantor's guarantee in practice is the combination of various reasons. In general, there are inherent restraints in the concept of law enforcement in the judicial organs, as well as defects in the existing laws and the influence of foreign personnel on a certain proportion of the personnel involved. There is also a lack of a complete regulatory system and a more complete social integrity mechanism for obtaining bail pending trial. The third part analyzes the necessity of perfecting the guarantee of the guarantor on bail in our country. In order to perfect a certain system, it is necessary to make clear the necessity and the value basis of the system. The author believes that the value basis of this system is mainly reflected in the following aspects: first, the embodiment of respecting citizens' personal liberty rights; second, the important measures to restrict the abuse of public power; and third, it is conducive to the realization of litigation economy. The fourth part is perfect measure. On the basis of using the mature legislation and practical experience of the extraterritorial guarantor system for reference, the author makes use of the comparative research method to change the idea, perfect the legislation, and set up the supervision mechanism. Four aspects of strengthening the sense of good faith put forward the concrete measures to improve the guarantee of the guarantor on bail waiting for trial in our country, in the hope that this system can play a full role in this system.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 元軼;;取保候審制度與保釋制度的比較法考察及其改良[J];比較法研究;2008年02期

2 張海燕;淺議取保候審制度中的擔保方式[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術學院學報;2005年02期

3 梁玉霞;;逮捕中心化的危機與解困出路——對我國刑事強制措施制度的整體檢討[J];法學評論;2011年04期

4 周偉;保釋解讀與我國取保候審制度改革[J];法學;2004年12期

5 宋英輝;;關于取保候審適用具體問題的調研分析[J];法學;2008年06期

6 王英韜;;我國偵查羈押替代性措施的反思與完善[J];法制與社會;2009年26期

7 房國賓,邱俊芳,齊s

本文編號：1923886