發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-21 11:01

  本文選題：非法證據(jù) + 證人證言��； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：非法取得的證人證言能否作為定案的依據(jù),是訴訟價(jià)值觀的重要體現(xiàn)。我國刑事訴訟法已經(jīng)初步確立了非法證人證言的排除規(guī)則。首先,本文開篇介紹了非法證人證言排除規(guī)則的國內(nèi)背景,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)相關(guān)立法尚存在缺陷,無法起到良好的排除作用。其次,本文釋析了非法證人證言排除規(guī)則的相關(guān)概念,不難發(fā)現(xiàn),非法證人證言的內(nèi)涵及外延還比較模糊；通過分析我國非法證人證言排除規(guī)則的立法現(xiàn)狀,將非法證人證言的表現(xiàn)形式歸納為以暴力、威脅方法獲取,以引誘、欺騙方法收集,違反基本程序收集,以其他方法收集證言這四個(gè)方面。從制度上分析探討其具體司法運(yùn)作及存在問題,指出非法證人證言的認(rèn)定關(guān)鍵在于精準(zhǔn)劃分引誘、欺騙的范圍,在死刑案件中,違反法定取證程序所獲證人證言也將被排除。并就如何正確排除非法證人證言,如何嚴(yán)格區(qū)分排除與補(bǔ)正,結(jié)合我國當(dāng)前排除模式和證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)提出設(shè)立專門救濟(jì)途徑的方案。最后,本文研究英美法系國家和大陸法系國家在立法和司法實(shí)踐中的不同處理方法,旨在結(jié)合我國的具體國情,吸收國外優(yōu)秀研究成果,提出應(yīng)當(dāng)在立法中確立和完善非法證人證言排除制度,并就建立相關(guān)的程序規(guī)定和保障制度提出初步設(shè)想和建議。
[Abstract]:Whether the illegal witness testimony can be taken as the basis of the decision is an important embodiment of the value of litigation. China's criminal procedure law has preliminarily established the exclusion rules of illegal witness testimony. First of all, this paper introduces the domestic background of the exclusion rules of illegal witness testimony, and finds that the relevant legislation still has defects, which can not play a good role in exclusion. Secondly, this paper analyzes the relevant concepts of the exclusion rules of illegal witness testimony. It is not difficult to find that the connotation and extension of illegal witness testimony is still vague. The manifestations of illegal witness testimony are summarized as four aspects: violence, threats, seduction, deception, violation of basic procedures, and other methods for the collection of testimonies. From the system analysis and discussion of its specific judicial operation and existing problems, it is pointed out that the key to the identification of illegal witness testimony lies in the precise division of the scope of inducement and deception. In death penalty cases, witness testimony obtained in violation of the statutory procedure for obtaining evidence will also be excluded. And how to correctly exclude the testimony of illegal witnesses, how to strictly distinguish between exclusion and correction, combined with the current exclusion mode and proof standard of our country, put forward the scheme of setting up special relief way. Finally, this paper studies the different approaches to legislation and judicial practice in common law countries and civil law countries, in order to absorb the outstanding research results of foreign countries combined with the specific conditions of our country. The author puts forward that the exclusion system of illegal witness testimony should be established and perfected in the legislation, and puts forward some tentative ideas and suggestions on the establishment of relevant procedural provisions and safeguard system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 牟軍;英國非法證據(jù)的處理規(guī)則與我國非法證據(jù)取舍的理性思考[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

2 鄧思清;;論非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

3 陳衛(wèi)東;;兩個(gè)證據(jù)規(guī)定的進(jìn)步與不足[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2010年05期

4 陳瑞華;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的理論解讀[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2010年05期

5 張華;黨衛(wèi)星;;我國刑事非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則之構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年02期

6 宋英輝;王貞會;;我國非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則及其適用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年07期

7 陳瑞華;;論瑕疵證據(jù)補(bǔ)正規(guī)則[J];法學(xué)家;2012年02期

8 陳光中;鄭曦;;論刑事訴訟中的證據(jù)裁判原則——兼談《刑事訴訟法》修改中的若干問題[J];法學(xué);2011年09期

9 高勇;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則實(shí)施的制約因素和對策分析[J];北華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

10 王京建;;論構(gòu)建我國刑事非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則[J];江南社會學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

，

本文編號：1918930