本文選題：部分請求 + 債�。� 參考：《當(dāng)代法學(xué)》2017年02期

【摘要】：部分請求的根本問題是殘部請求的合法性。這一問題首先需要從概念內(nèi)涵層面對部分請求進(jìn)行實體法和程序法的勾連,從而為訴訟法視角下的合法性分析提供語境基礎(chǔ)。實際上,從實體請求權(quán)的角度識別訴訟標(biāo)的,一些被定性為部分請求的案件實為完整請求權(quán)下的獨立之訴。在明晰部分請求本質(zhì)屬性的基礎(chǔ)上,應(yīng)通過適用禁止重復(fù)起訴條款排除殘部請求的合法性,并在首次部分請求滿足"明示部分請求"、"說明正當(dāng)理由"、"獲得勝訴判決"三項標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的情況下允許提起殘部請求。對于前后兩次請求實為兩個獨立的訴的案件,不宜采取變相強制合并的嚴(yán)格立場。
[Abstract]:The fundamental problem of part of the request is the legality of the residual request. At first, this problem needs to connect the substantive law with the procedural law from the concept connotation level, so as to provide the contextual basis for the legitimacy analysis from the angle of procedural law. In fact, identifying the object of action from the point of view of substantive claim, some cases characterized as partial claims are actually independent actions under the complete right of claim. On the basis of clarifying the essential attributes of part of the request, the lawfulness of the residual request should be excluded through the application of the prohibition of repeated prosecution. In the case of the first partial request to satisfy the "express partial request", the "justification" and the "winning judgment" three criteria are allowed to initiate the residual motion. It is not advisable to adopt the strict position of covert compulsory merger for the cases in which the two requests are in fact two independent actions.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2014年度國家社會科學(xué)基金重大項目“審判中心視角下的刑事、民事和行政訴訟制度改革研究”(14ZDC014)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 Q紅，

本文編號：1918299