本文選題：刑事和解 + 恢復(fù)性司法��； 參考：《甘肅政法學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：如今,在現(xiàn)代社會中,“和諧”早已成為我國的主流思想,這一思想在處理人與人之間,人與社會之間的關(guān)系都起到了良好的作用。尤其是在司法實踐中,更是成了為廣大法律人所追求的價值。在傳統(tǒng)的中國法律文化當中,刑事法律依然帶有濃厚的復(fù)仇色彩,雖然在打擊和懲治犯罪中起到了一定的作用,但是它依然存在著某些無法避免的問題。為了追求和諧理念,為了使人與人之問,人與社會之間求同存異、共同發(fā)展,為了使犯罪嫌疑人、被告人真誠悔罪復(fù)歸社會,重新得到社會的認可和自我的認可,在寬嚴相濟的刑事政策下,刑事和解便應(yīng)運而生。這對于提高司法效率、節(jié)約司法成本起到了重大作用,在刑事司法中具有重大的意義。 本文共分四章。第一章主要闡述了刑事和解制度的一些基本問題,包括刑事和解的概念、制度、特征,作用。第二章分析了刑事和解制度的理論基礎(chǔ),包括域外理論基礎(chǔ)和國內(nèi)的法律文化基礎(chǔ)以及司法實踐和刑事政策的指導(dǎo)。第三章著重分析了我國在刑事和解制度中存在的立法缺陷和司法缺陷。第四章主要是針對刑事和解制度進行構(gòu)想建設(shè),建立犯罪嫌疑人、被告人自主悔過機制、刑事和解主持者多元模式、建立完善的被害人國家補償基金制度。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, in modern society, "harmony" has already become the mainstream thought of our country, this thought has played a good role in dealing with the relationship between people and society. Especially in the judicial practice, it has become the value pursued by the vast number of legal people. In the traditional Chinese legal culture, criminal law still has a strong color of revenge, although it has played a certain role in the fight against and punishment of crime, it still has some unavoidable problems. In order to pursue the idea of harmony, to make people ask questions, to seek common ground while reserving differences between people and society, to develop together, to make suspects and defendants sincerely repent and return to society, and to get the recognition of society and self-recognition again. Under the criminal policy of combining leniency and severe punishment, criminal reconciliation came into being. It plays an important role in improving judicial efficiency and saving judicial cost, and has great significance in criminal justice. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter mainly expounds some basic problems of the criminal reconciliation system, including the concept, system, characteristics and function of the criminal reconciliation system. The second chapter analyzes the theoretical basis of the criminal reconciliation system, including the extraterritorial theoretical basis and the domestic legal and cultural basis, as well as judicial practice and the guidance of criminal policy. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of the legislative and judicial defects in the system of criminal reconciliation. The fourth chapter is to construct the criminal reconciliation system, to establish the criminal suspect, the accused independent repentance mechanism, the criminal reconciliation moderator multi-mode, to establish a perfect national compensation fund system for victims.
【學位授予單位】：甘肅政法學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 葛琳;;刑事和解的現(xiàn)實困境解析[J];中國司法;2010年05期

2 王宏瓔;高琪;吳榮芳;;刑事和解理念的確立與檢察權(quán)的配置[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2009年04期

3 王利明;;法學方法論[J];法制資訊;2012年08期

4 孟寬;李霖;;刑事和解在我國的實踐、立法與完善[J];衡陽師范學院學報;2013年04期

5 李龍,張革文;法律與和諧[J];社會科學;2005年10期

6 張乾瑞;;公訴案件和解程序的法律價值[J];人民檢察;2013年03期

7 盧青;;淺議刑事被害人權(quán)利保護的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];理論學習;2008年04期

8 陳光中;;刑事和解再探[J];中國刑事法雜志;2010年02期

9 褚國建;;法院如何回應(yīng)民意:一種法學方法論上的解決方案[J];浙江社會科學;2010年03期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 吳淼;刑事被害人國家補償制度研究[D];吉林大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1917644