本文選題：重罪案件 + 刑事和解　； 參考：《太原科技大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)于2013年在新的《刑事訴訟法》第五編第二章中規(guī)定輕罪案件予以適用刑事和解。面對(duì)日益復(fù)雜的犯罪行為，為了最大限度的緩解雙方當(dāng)事人矛盾，促進(jìn)社會(huì)的和諧與穩(wěn)定，針對(duì)部分重罪案件，，可以適用刑事和解制度。 鑒于重罪案件的加害人比輕罪案件的加害人人身危險(xiǎn)性高、主觀惡性大、社會(huì)影響惡劣，因此，針對(duì)重罪案件刑事和解的適用要予以條件限制。部分重罪案件刑事和解有其存在的正當(dāng)性，并不必然導(dǎo)致“花錢買刑”，并不必然損害刑法的威嚴(yán)性與不可侵犯性。法律的終極目的不是為了讓這個(gè)社會(huì)充滿仇恨，而是要淡化人們內(nèi)心的報(bào)復(fù)心理，真正地化解矛盾，促進(jìn)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定與和諧。部分重罪案件的刑事和解，其實(shí)質(zhì)上是一種在國(guó)家制度構(gòu)架下，公權(quán)力的適當(dāng)讓渡，公權(quán)力與私權(quán)利之間、私權(quán)利與私權(quán)利之間達(dá)成的一定程度上的和諧。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的刑事立法及政策已經(jīng)體現(xiàn)了重罪案件在一定范圍內(nèi)可以進(jìn)行刑事和解，而各地法院也在逐漸嘗試將該制度運(yùn)用于部分重罪案件的審判中，并得到越來(lái)越多公眾的認(rèn)可，取得了良好的司法與社會(huì)效果。同時(shí)，刑罰輕緩化是目前的國(guó)際發(fā)展趨勢(shì)，也是社會(huì)發(fā)展的必然要求。因此，建立符合中國(guó)社會(huì)發(fā)展需要的部分重罪案件刑事和解制度勢(shì)在必行。
[Abstract]:In 2013, our country stipulated in Chapter 2 of the new Criminal procedure Code that minor crime cases should be applied to criminal reconciliation. In the face of increasingly complex criminal acts, in order to minimize the contradiction between the two parties and promote social harmony and stability, the criminal reconciliation system can be applied to some felony cases. In view of the fact that the perpetrators in felony cases are more dangerous than those in misdemeanor cases, the subjective malignancy is great, and the social influence is bad. Therefore, the application of criminal reconciliation in felony cases should be restricted. Criminal reconciliation in some felony cases has its legitimacy and does not necessarily lead to "spending money to buy punishment", and does not necessarily damage the majesty and inviolability of criminal law. The ultimate purpose of law is not to make the society full of hatred, but to desalinate the people's inner retaliatory psychology, to resolve the contradiction and to promote the stability and harmony of the society. The criminal reconciliation of some felony cases is essentially a kind of harmony between public power and private right and between private right and private right under the framework of national system. The current criminal legislation and policies of our country have already reflected that felony cases can be reconciled within a certain range, and local courts are gradually trying to apply this system to the trial of some serious crimes cases. And get more and more public recognition, achieved good judicial and social results. At the same time, the penalty mitigation is the current international development trend, but also the inevitable requirement of social development. Therefore, it is imperative to establish the criminal reconciliation system of some felony cases in accordance with the needs of social development in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 李?yuàn)^飛;;刑事和解制度的“中國(guó)式”建構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2006年05期

2 陳光中;;刑事和解的理論基礎(chǔ)與司法適用[J];人民檢察;2006年10期

3 劉家琛;對(duì)當(dāng)前我國(guó)刑罰適用的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];人民司法;2002年07期

4 劉凌梅;西方國(guó)家刑事和解理論與實(shí)踐介評(píng)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年01期

5 向朝陽(yáng),馬靜華;刑事和解的價(jià)值構(gòu)造及中國(guó)模式的構(gòu)建[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2003年06期

6 馬明亮;辯訴交易在中國(guó)的發(fā)展前景——以契約為分析框架[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2003年02期

本文編號(hào)：1876144