本文選題：民事訴訟 + 誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則��； 參考：《山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)于2012年對(duì)民事訴訟法進(jìn)行了修訂,將誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則作為一項(xiàng)民事訴訟原則寫入法典。這使得誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則在我國(guó)民事訴訟法中得以明文化。但是,明文化后的誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則并沒有滿足人們的預(yù)期,因?yàn)閷?duì)其適用的具體內(nèi)涵和外延都沒有明確的規(guī)定,也就無法給民事訴訟的各方參與者提供有效的制度供給。對(duì)于民事訴訟中誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則進(jìn)行更加具體、細(xì)致的研究,就顯得非常必要。而這種指向于我國(guó)當(dāng)代民事訴訟發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的研究,必須建立在對(duì)于誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的歷史及當(dāng)代發(fā)展過程進(jìn)行梳理與比較研究的基礎(chǔ)上,才能得出可靠的答案。對(duì)誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的歷史形成過程進(jìn)行研究,首先應(yīng)追溯到羅馬法民事訴訟中。利用現(xiàn)代法的視角,找出羅馬法民事訴訟中所蘊(yùn)含的當(dāng)代意義下的誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則,厘清誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的發(fā)展起源,從源頭上發(fā)現(xiàn)這一原則在民事訴訟中的應(yīng)有含義及發(fā)揮的作用。通過歷史發(fā)展的研究視角,發(fā)現(xiàn)誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則從羅馬法的民事訴訟開始,經(jīng)過中世紀(jì)的帝國(guó)樞密法院訴訟程序、普魯士一般法院法等繼承,厘清了這一原則在民事訴訟法研究脈絡(luò)之下的發(fā)展軌跡。受法國(guó)民事訴訟法典對(duì)于近代歐洲大陸民事訴訟法的影響,誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則在歐陸民事訴訟法中有了一段時(shí)間的消失,但是由于民事訴訟自身的發(fā)展需要及有利的外部環(huán)境,使這一原則在二十世紀(jì)初的德國(guó)民事訴訟法中得到了復(fù)蘇。誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則由于其自身含義的多樣性及適用范圍的廣泛性,對(duì)這一原則進(jìn)行研究討論,就必須要以非常細(xì)致的方法進(jìn)行。將民事訴訟中誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行梳理后,將這一原則分為三個(gè)層面,分別為文義解釋層面、民事訴訟中基本原則層面、民事訴訟中具體制度層面,進(jìn)行精細(xì)化的探討。由于誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則具有“憲法性條款”的特殊性,以及發(fā)展的歷史性,因此應(yīng)當(dāng)采用能夠解釋憲法條款的解釋方法,才是適合于我國(guó)民事訴訟發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀的解釋方法。將目光置于當(dāng)今憲法解釋發(fā)展最為先進(jìn)的美國(guó),通過對(duì)于原旨主義解釋方法和整體性解釋方法進(jìn)行比較后,得出我國(guó)民事訴訟中誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的解釋,應(yīng)當(dāng)適用整體性解釋方法的結(jié)論。這樣才能較好地滿足于我國(guó)民事訴訟的發(fā)展需求。用整體性方法來解釋誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則,需要落實(shí)到民事訴訟的具體制度措施層面。通過對(duì)誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的規(guī)制主體進(jìn)行類型化討論,并以具體制度體現(xiàn)這一原則的內(nèi)涵,最終使誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則在我國(guó)民事訴訟中的作用,得到切實(shí)發(fā)揮。
[Abstract]:In 2012, China amended the Civil procedure Law and incorporated the principle of good faith into the Code of Civil procedure. This makes the principle of good faith in our country's civil procedure law to be clear culture. However, the principle of good faith after Ming culture does not meet the expectations of people, because the specific connotation and extension of its application do not have clear provisions, so it is impossible to provide effective institutional supply to the participants in civil proceedings. It is necessary to study the principle of good faith in civil action. This kind of research which is directed at the development of contemporary civil action in our country must be based on combing and comparing the history and contemporary development process of the principle of good faith in order to obtain a reliable answer. The history of the principle of good faith should be traced back to the civil action of Roman law. From the perspective of modern law, this paper finds out the principle of good faith in the contemporary meaning of Roman civil litigation, and clarifies the origin of the development of the principle of good faith. Find out the meaning and function of this principle in civil action from the source. From the perspective of historical development, it is found that the principle of good faith begins with the civil action of Roman law, passes through the medieval imperial court proceedings, and inherits the general court law of Prussia. It clarifies the development of this principle in the context of the study of civil procedure law. Influenced by the French Code of Civil procedure, the principle of good faith disappeared in the European Civil procedure Law for a period of time, but due to the needs of the development of the civil procedure itself and the favorable external environment, This principle was revived in the German Civil procedure Code in the early twentieth century. Due to the diversity of its meaning and the wide range of its application, the principle of good faith must be studied and discussed in a very detailed way. After combing the connotation of the principle of good faith in civil action, this principle is divided into three levels, namely, the level of interpretation of text and meaning, the level of basic principle in civil action, and the level of specific system in civil action. Because the principle of good faith has the particularity of "constitutional clause" and the history of development, we should adopt the interpretation method which can explain the constitutional clause, which is suitable for the development of civil litigation in our country. Focusing on the most advanced development of constitutional interpretation in the United States, by comparing the methods of fundamentalist interpretation and holistic interpretation, the author draws the interpretation of the principle of good faith in civil litigation in China. Conclusions of the holistic interpretation method should be applied. Only in this way can we meet the needs of the development of civil litigation in our country. To explain the principle of good faith with the holistic method, it is necessary to carry out the specific system measures of civil action. Through the type discussion of the regulation subject of the principle of good faith and the embodiment of the connotation of this principle with the concrete system, the function of the principle of good faith in the civil litigation of our country can be brought into full play.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1
，

本文編號(hào)：1873370