本文選題：偵查訊問程序 + 同步��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：偵查訊問同步錄音錄像制度是在人權(quán)保障背景下,保障犯罪嫌疑人權(quán)利的有力措施。偵查訊問同步錄音錄像資料的性質(zhì)要根據(jù)其功能及目的動(dòng)態(tài)看待：在證明偵查訊問程序是否合法的問題上,同步錄音錄像資料是視聽資料；作為犯罪嫌疑人口供的一種記錄方式,同步錄音錄像資料是犯罪嫌疑人供述和辯解。同步錄音錄像資料具有同步錄制性、客觀真實(shí)性、反復(fù)再現(xiàn)性、復(fù)印件與原件的高度一致性、立體動(dòng)態(tài)性以及表現(xiàn)形式多樣化等特點(diǎn)。偵查訊問同步錄音錄像具有重要意義。對(duì)訊問程序而言,可以保障訊問程序的公正和合法；提高訊問效率；固定證據(jù)和提高口供的證明能力；防止訊問過程中的刑訊逼供。對(duì)犯罪嫌疑人而言,一方面保障犯罪嫌疑人的合法權(quán)利,另一方面減少犯罪嫌疑人翻供的現(xiàn)象。對(duì)偵查訊問人員而言,可以消除人們對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)的偏見和誤解；規(guī)范偵查訊問人員的執(zhí)法行為、提高執(zhí)法水平；保障偵查訊問人員的合法權(quán)利。偵查訊問同步錄音錄像制度的理論基礎(chǔ)包括保障人權(quán)理論、正當(dāng)法律程序理論以及控辯平衡理論。域外對(duì)偵查訊問同步錄音錄像制度的立法規(guī)定和實(shí)踐對(duì)我國具有借鑒意義。我國有關(guān)訊問同步錄音、錄像的規(guī)定在最高人民檢察院和公安部頒布的相關(guān)規(guī)定中有所涉及。檢察院于2006年在全國開展偵查訊問同步錄音錄像工作,隨后,公安機(jī)關(guān)和法院也開始錄音錄像制度的實(shí)踐。偵查訊問同步錄音錄像制度及實(shí)施中存在諸多問題,如基本法層面沒有規(guī)定；適應(yīng)范圍過窄；缺乏中立錄制主體及監(jiān)督主體；沒有規(guī)定訊問錄音錄像前的告知內(nèi)容；缺少對(duì)訊問錄音錄像時(shí)公開性的規(guī)定；沒有規(guī)定犯罪嫌疑人異議權(quán)；缺乏救濟(jì)權(quán)相關(guān)規(guī)定；大部分地區(qū)經(jīng)費(fèi)緊張；基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施不完善；專業(yè)技術(shù)人員缺乏；偵查訊問人員人權(quán)保障意識(shí)淡薄等。我們應(yīng)該從提升偵查訊問同步錄音錄像制度的立法層次,規(guī)范制度設(shè)計(jì),解決好司法實(shí)踐中存在的問題等方面來完善同步錄音錄像制度。
[Abstract]:The system of simultaneous recording and video recording of investigation and interrogation is a powerful measure to protect the rights of criminal suspects under the background of human rights protection. The nature of the synchronous audio and video recording material for investigation and interrogation should be viewed according to its function and purpose: on the question of proving whether the procedure of investigation and interrogation is legal, the synchronous audio and video recording material is audio-visual material; As a recording method of suspect's confession, synchronous audio and video recording is the confession and explanation of criminal suspect. Synchronous audio and video recording materials are characterized by synchronous recording, objective authenticity, repeated reproduction, high consistency between the photocopy and the original, stereoscopic dynamics and diversified forms of expression. The simultaneous recording and video recording of investigation and interrogation is of great significance. As far as interrogation procedure is concerned, it can guarantee the fairness and legality of interrogation procedure, improve the efficiency of interrogation, stabilize evidence and improve the ability of proving confession, and prevent torture in the process of interrogation. To the suspect, on the one hand, the legal rights of the suspect are guaranteed, on the other hand, the phenomenon of the suspect reopening his confession is reduced. For the investigators, it can eliminate the prejudice and misunderstanding of the public security organs, standardize the law enforcement behavior of the investigators and interrogators, improve the law enforcement level, and ensure the lawful rights of the investigators and interrogators. The theoretical basis of simultaneous audio and video recording system of investigation and interrogation includes the theory of protecting human rights, the theory of due process of law and the theory of balance of prosecution and defense. The legislative provisions and practice of the simultaneous audio and video recording system of investigation and interrogation abroad have reference significance for our country. The regulations on simultaneous recording and video recording of interrogation in China are related to the relevant regulations issued by the Supreme people's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security. The procuratorate carried out the simultaneous recording and video recording work in the whole country in 2006. Subsequently, the public security organ and the court also began the practice of recording and video recording system. There are many problems in the system and implementation of simultaneous audio and video recording for investigation and interrogation, such as no provision in the basic Law, too narrow scope of adaptation, lack of neutral recording subject and supervisory subject, no provision of the contents of the information before the audiovisual interrogation; Lack of public requirements for audiovisual interrogation; lack of provisions on the right of dissent of criminal suspects; lack of relevant provisions on relief rights; shortage of funds in most areas; inadequate infrastructure; lack of professional and technical personnel; The consciousness of human rights protection for investigators and interrogators is weak. We should improve the synchronous audio and video recording system from the aspects of improving the legislative level of the synchronous audio and video recording system of investigation and interrogation, standardizing the system design, and solving the problems existing in the judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 賴小霞;公安機(jī)關(guān)全程同步錄音錄像的有效運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1867677