發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-26 21:35

  本文選題：先行調(diào)解 + 適宜調(diào)解��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：2012年8月31日,全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)會(huì)議修改了《中華人民共和國(guó)民事訴訟法》,確立了先行調(diào)解制度。修改后的《中華人民共和國(guó)民事訴訟法》第122條規(guī)定“當(dāng)事人起訴到人民法院的民事糾紛,適宜調(diào)解的,先行調(diào)解,但當(dāng)事人拒絕調(diào)解的除外�！痹摋l規(guī)定從而確立了我國(guó)民事訴訟領(lǐng)域的一項(xiàng)新制度,即先行調(diào)解制度。該制度的確立,有著重大深遠(yuǎn)的意義。改革開(kāi)放以來(lái),隨著我國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展,法制日益健全,人民的法制觀念不斷提高,隨而帶來(lái)的是我國(guó)法院每年需要解決大量的民事訴訟案件,根據(jù)《最高人民法院公報(bào)》中的數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì),我國(guó)人民法院在2009年受理的第一審民事案件為五百八十多萬(wàn)件,2010年,人民法院受理的第一審民事案件突破了六百萬(wàn)件,2011年則超過(guò)了六百六十萬(wàn)件,2012年則達(dá)到了八百四十多萬(wàn)件,并且每年呈遞增的態(tài)勢(shì)。我國(guó)第一審民事案件的逐年遞增給我國(guó)的人民法院帶來(lái)了巨大的壓力,尤其是基層人民法院。此次先行調(diào)解制度的確立,立法機(jī)關(guān)通過(guò)立法明確賦予了法院對(duì)立案受理前的案件進(jìn)行調(diào)解的權(quán)力,人民法院在立案受理前的先行調(diào)解有了法律可循。這樣就會(huì)有大量的民事案件在沒(méi)有進(jìn)入訴訟程序之前就得到了解決,將會(huì)在一定程度上緩解人民法院的審判壓力,此次民事訴訟法修改確立的先行調(diào)解制度是我國(guó)替代性糾紛解決機(jī)制(ADR)的重要組成部分,對(duì)于完善我國(guó)的社會(huì)糾紛解決體系,完善我國(guó)社會(huì)主義法治具有重要意義。但是,需要指出的是,本次民事訴訟法確立的先行調(diào)解制度也有諸多的不足之處,在未來(lái)的民事訴訟法的修改中需要加以完善。 本文共分為五章。第一章是先行調(diào)解的概述,本章指出了我國(guó)還沒(méi)有對(duì)先行調(diào)解的概念進(jìn)行明確的現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)先行調(diào)解的概念進(jìn)行了明確。第二章是先行調(diào)解的原則,闡述了先行調(diào)解的四大原則,即自愿原則、保密原則、高效便捷原則、保密原則。第三章是先行調(diào)解的具體內(nèi)容解讀,分析了先行調(diào)解的適用范圍、先行調(diào)解的主體、先行調(diào)解的啟動(dòng)、先行調(diào)解的進(jìn)行、先行調(diào)解的結(jié)果及效力以及先行調(diào)解的費(fèi)用,明確闡述了先行調(diào)解制度在實(shí)務(wù)中應(yīng)當(dāng)如何具體適用。第四章是先行調(diào)解制度的不足,羅列了我國(guó)先行調(diào)解制度的不足之處。第五章先行調(diào)解制度的完善,針對(duì)我國(guó)先行調(diào)解制度還存在的問(wèn)題,提出了修改的建議,為我國(guó)未來(lái)民事訴訟法的完善出謀劃策。
[Abstract]:On August 31, 2012, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress amended the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China and established the system of advance mediation. Article 122 of the revised Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China provides that "where a civil dispute brought by a party to a people's court is suitable for mediation, mediation shall be carried out first, except if the party refuses to mediate." Therefore, this article establishes a new system in the field of civil action in China, namely the system of mediation in advance. The establishment of this system is of great significance. Since the reform and opening up, with the continuous development of the market economy in our country, the legal system has become increasingly sound, and the people's concept of legal system has been constantly improved, which has brought about the need for the courts of our country to solve a large number of civil litigation cases every year. According to the statistics in the "Supreme people's Court Bulletin", the number of first instance civil cases accepted by the Chinese people's courts in 2009 was more than 580 million, and in 2010, The first instance civil cases accepted by the people's courts exceeded 6 million, more than 6.6 million in 2011, and more than 840 million in 2012, with an increasing trend every year. The increasing number of civil cases in the first instance of our country brings great pressure to the people's courts of our country, especially the basic people's courts. With the establishment of the mediation system, the legislature has explicitly given the court the power to mediate the cases before filing for acceptance, and the people's court has a law to follow before accepting the case. In this way, a large number of civil cases will be resolved before entering the proceedings, which will to a certain extent relieve the people's court of trial pressure. The mediation system in advance established by the revision of the Civil procedure Law is an important part of the alternative dispute resolution mechanism in China. It is of great significance to perfect the social dispute resolution system and the socialist rule of law in our country. However, it should be pointed out that the mediation system established in this civil procedure law also has many deficiencies, which need to be perfected in the revision of the civil procedure law in the future. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an overview of the first mediation, this chapter points out that our country has not been clear about the concept of mediation in advance of the status quo, the concept of mediation in advance is clear. The second chapter is the principle of mediation in advance, elaborated the four principles of mediation in advance, namely voluntary principle, confidentiality principle, efficient and convenient principle, confidentiality principle. The third chapter is the interpretation of the specific content of the first mediation, analyzes the scope of application of the first mediation, the subject of the first mediation, the initiation of the first mediation, the conduct of the first mediation, the results and effectiveness of the first mediation, and the costs of the first mediation. This paper expounds clearly how the system of mediation in advance should be applied in practice. The fourth chapter is the deficiency of the advance mediation system, which lists the deficiencies of the first mediation system in our country. The fifth chapter is the perfection of the mediation system in advance, aiming at the problems existing in the system of mediation in advance in our country, the author puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the civil procedure law of our country in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 許少波;;先行調(diào)解的三重含義[J];海峽法學(xué);2013年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1807809