發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-26 09:32

  本文選題：高校信息公開 + 行政訴訟�。� 參考：《海南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：公開、透明、陽光是現(xiàn)代社會(huì)發(fā)展進(jìn)程的世界性趨勢(shì)。高校信息公開,有利于約束不受羈絆的高校公權(quán)力,擴(kuò)展社會(huì)公眾的監(jiān)督權(quán),提升現(xiàn)代大學(xué)治理水平,增強(qiáng)高校的社會(huì)適應(yīng)性。在以權(quán)力監(jiān)督和權(quán)利保障為中心的時(shí)代,建立健全高校信息公開法律救濟(jì)體系,對(duì)于保障相對(duì)人知情權(quán)、參與權(quán)等合法權(quán)益具有重要意義。然而,我們也應(yīng)清晰地看到,由于目前高校作為行政主體的地位還未完全明確,法律、法規(guī)和規(guī)章對(duì)高校信息公開行政訴訟缺乏明確的規(guī)定,加之人民法院對(duì)高校行政案件的受理持保守政策,使得本應(yīng)納入到行政訴訟救濟(jì),接受司法審查的高校信息公開行為在司法實(shí)踐中難以推進(jìn)。高校信息公開不能任由高校自統(tǒng)自治,只有將其納入行政訴訟,接受法院的司法審查,方能實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)力與責(zé)任的統(tǒng)一。本文結(jié)合“高校信息公開訴訟第一案”,在分析高校信息公開的范圍與方式、高校信息公開行政訴訟的特點(diǎn)等內(nèi)容的基礎(chǔ)上,探究建立高校信息公開行政訴訟制度的必要性和可行性；在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合高校自身的特殊性,分析將其納入行政訴訟,面臨的障礙及解決辦法；最后從受案范圍、當(dāng)事人資格、舉證責(zé)任分配、裁判種類等方面對(duì)高校信息公開行政訴訟進(jìn)行具體的制度設(shè)計(jì)。 全文除引言和結(jié)語外,共分為四個(gè)部分。各部分的主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分是高校信息公開及其行政訴訟的一般理論。通過對(duì)高校信息、高校信息公開的概念、性質(zhì)、范圍、方式等基本內(nèi)容的分析,歸納出高校信息公開行政訴訟概念與特點(diǎn),為建立高校信息公開行政訴訟制度提供理論支撐。 第二部分是建立高校信息公開行政訴訟的必要性和可行性。將高校信息公開爭(zhēng)議納入行政訴訟有其現(xiàn)實(shí)必要性和緊迫性,是保障社會(huì)公眾知情權(quán)、參與權(quán),完善高校信息公開法律救濟(jì)體系,保證現(xiàn)代大學(xué)治理制度實(shí)現(xiàn)的需求,是法治要求,更是時(shí)代使然；而理論支撐、規(guī)范依據(jù)、司法實(shí)踐、域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)又為建立高校信息公開行政訴訟制度提供了基本路徑,具有可行性。 第三部分是建立高校信息公開行政訴訟面臨的障礙及障礙之克服。本部分從僵化陳舊的觀念、大學(xué)自治與司法審查的沖突、司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)高校信息公開行政訴訟的保守政策、高校辦學(xué)自主權(quán)未得到應(yīng)有尊重和保障等方面分析了建立高校信息公開行政訴訟面臨的障礙,并結(jié)合實(shí)際提出克服上述障礙的解決辦法。 第四部分是高校信息公開行政訴訟的具體制度建構(gòu)。本部分結(jié)合高校信息公開的特點(diǎn),從高校信息公開行政訴訟的受案范圍、當(dāng)事人資格認(rèn)定、舉證責(zé)任分配、司法機(jī)關(guān)的裁判類型等角度,對(duì)高校信息公開行政訴訟進(jìn)行具體的制度建構(gòu),從而為司法機(jī)關(guān)審理高校信息公開行政案件提供理論參考。
[Abstract]:Openness, transparency and sunshine are the worldwide trend of the development of modern society. The disclosure of information in colleges and universities is conducive to restricting the unfettered public power of colleges and universities, expanding the supervisory power of the social public, improving the level of modern university governance, and enhancing the social adaptability of colleges and universities. In the era of power supervision and protection of rights, it is of great significance to establish and perfect the legal relief system of information disclosure in colleges and universities for the protection of the relative person's right to know and the right to participate. However, we should also clearly see that, as the status of colleges and universities as administrative subjects has not yet been fully clarified, laws, regulations and rules have no clear provisions on the administrative litigation of information disclosure in colleges and universities. In addition, the people's court holds the conservative policy to accept the administrative cases in colleges and universities, which makes it difficult to push forward the behavior of information disclosure in colleges and universities which should be brought into the relief of administrative litigation and accepted judicial review in the judicial practice. The disclosure of university information can not be allowed to be self-governing and autonomous. Only by bringing it into administrative proceedings and accepting judicial review by the court can the unity of power and responsibility be realized. On the basis of analyzing the scope and mode of information disclosure in colleges and universities and the characteristics of administrative litigation in colleges and universities, this paper combines with the first case of Information publicity Litigation in Colleges and Universities. This paper probes into the necessity and feasibility of establishing the administrative litigation system of information publicity in colleges and universities; on this basis, combining with the particularity of the university itself, analyzes the obstacles and solutions to bring it into the administrative litigation; finally, from the scope of accepting the case, Party qualification, burden of proof distribution, types of adjudication and other aspects of the university information publicity administrative litigation system design. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into four parts. The main elements of each part are as follows: The first part is the general theory of university information disclosure and administrative litigation. Based on the analysis of the concept, nature, scope and mode of information disclosure in colleges and universities, this paper summarizes the concept and characteristics of administrative litigation of information disclosure in colleges and universities, and provides theoretical support for the establishment of administrative litigation system of information disclosure in colleges and universities. The second part is the necessity and feasibility of establishing administrative litigation of information publicity in colleges and universities. It is necessary and urgent to bring the dispute of information disclosure into administrative litigation. It is the need to protect the public's right to know and participate, to perfect the legal relief system of information disclosure in colleges and universities, and to ensure the realization of modern university governance system. It is the requirement of the rule of law, and it is the result of the times, and the theoretical support, the normative basis, the judicial practice and the extraterritorial experience provide the basic path and feasibility for the establishment of the administrative litigation system of information publicity in colleges and universities. The third part is to establish the university information public administrative proceedings faced obstacles and obstacles to overcome. This part from the rigid old concept, the conflict between university autonomy and judicial review, the judicial organ to the university information public administrative litigation conservative policy, This paper analyzes the obstacles to the establishment of administrative litigation of information publicity in colleges and universities, and puts forward the solutions to overcome the above obstacles in the light of the fact that the autonomy of running a university is not respected and guaranteed. The fourth part is the specific system construction of administrative litigation of information disclosure in colleges and universities. This part combines the characteristics of information disclosure in colleges and universities, from the perspective of the scope of cases accepted, the qualification of the parties, the distribution of the burden of proof, the types of adjudication of judicial organs, and so on. This paper constructs a concrete system for administrative litigation of information publicity in colleges and universities, thus providing a theoretical reference for judicial organs to try administrative cases of information disclosure in colleges and universities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘海生;;作為利益相關(guān)者組織的大學(xué)治理理論分析[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

2 李廣宇;;反信息公開行政訴訟問題研究[J];法律適用;2007年08期

3 楊小軍;;行政訴訟受案范圍之反思[J];法商研究;2009年04期

4 趙正群;宮雁;;美國(guó)的信息公開訴訟制度及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年01期

5 ;田永訴北京科技大學(xué)拒絕頒發(fā)畢業(yè)證、學(xué)位證行政訴訟案[J];中華人民共和國(guó)最高人民法院公報(bào);1999年04期

6 陳明湖;;政府信息公開訴訟中證明責(zé)任的失范與重構(gòu)[J];法治研究;2011年01期

7 尹曉敏;;高校信息公開若干疑難問題解析[J];高等教育研究;2011年07期

8 張紅菊;;英國(guó)信息公開制度及其特點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)監(jiān)察;2009年02期

9 尹曉敏;;高校信息公開:從學(xué)術(shù)、立法到機(jī)制的邏輯[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué);2010年07期

10 張坤世,歐愛民;現(xiàn)代行政訴訟制度發(fā)展的特點(diǎn)——兼與我國(guó)相關(guān)制度比較[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1805439