本文選題：未成年人 + 輕罪記錄消除��； 參考：《貴州民族大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：《刑事訴訟法》修改后,明確規(guī)定了針對未成年犯罪人的輕罪記錄封存制度。該制度在設(shè)計(jì)之初就備受關(guān)注,修正的《刑事訴訟法》正式實(shí)施后無論在刑法理論界學(xué)者還是司法實(shí)踐部門,未成年人輕罪記錄封存或者消除都是較為熱議的話題之一。該制度正如一把“雙刃劍”,人們在感概該制度具有重大現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和理論價(jià)值的同時(shí),也擔(dān)憂會與早已立法成熟的其他國家產(chǎn)生不同的問題。G市作為G省的省會城市,在近幾年的司法實(shí)踐中加緊對該制度的落實(shí),取得了可喜的成績,但也存在諸多問題,譬如:涉及未成年犯罪人案卷文書形式封存方面,法院、檢察機(jī)關(guān)和公安機(jī)關(guān)等部門能夠較好地落實(shí)國家相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,設(shè)立了獨(dú)立的案卷文書封存柜,非法定程序不得由第三方單位或者個(gè)人查詢,但涉及實(shí)質(zhì)封存時(shí),公安機(jī)關(guān)則需要給予更多的程序上的配合和技術(shù)上的支持,等等。綜合調(diào)研情況和搜集的文獻(xiàn)資料,G市在貫徹落實(shí)該制度時(shí)主要存在三大問題:一是制度內(nèi)在規(guī)定不夠具體,規(guī)定的比較寬泛,不夠細(xì)致,在實(shí)踐中缺乏必要的操作性。尤其是涉及輕罪記錄消除決定權(quán)的適用主體、決定權(quán)的適用對象、消除制度適用的具體程序、消除后的法律效果等等問題均未具體化;二是該制度外部運(yùn)行環(huán)境受阻較多,不僅與我國一些相關(guān)法律法規(guī)相沖突,而且缺乏保障其有效運(yùn)行的配套制度;三是有關(guān)部門及人員對該制度重視程度不夠,客觀上阻礙了該制度的順利運(yùn)行和相關(guān)工作的開展。本文共分為三部分。第一部分旨在研究未成年人輕罪記錄消除制度的基礎(chǔ)問題,包括概念界定以及理論基礎(chǔ)分析等內(nèi)容,旨在歸納出國內(nèi)外對此問題的研究現(xiàn)狀,并對域外有關(guān)該制度進(jìn)行基本的概括1,明確研究的范圍,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出自己的觀點(diǎn);第二部分是從目前G市相關(guān)工作中存在的主要問題以及存在的不足之處進(jìn)行剖析;第三部分是在總結(jié)域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)并結(jié)合G市工作基礎(chǔ)上,提出完善該制度的一些設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:After the revision of the Code of Criminal procedure, the system of sealing and storing minor crimes against minor offenders is clearly stipulated. The system has attracted much attention since the beginning of its design. After the revised Code of Criminal procedure has been formally implemented, whether in the criminal law theorists or judicial practice departments, the closure or elimination of minor misdemeanor records is one of the hot topics. This system is like a "double-edged sword". While people feel that the system has great practical significance and theoretical value, they also worry that the city of G. will have a different problem from other countries that have long had mature legislation. In recent years, we have stepped up the implementation of this system in judicial practice, and achieved gratifying results. However, there are still many problems, such as: concerning the form of file sealing of juvenile offenders, the court, Procuratorial organs, public security organs and other departments have been able to implement the relevant laws and regulations of the state, and have set up independent file file storage cabinets. Non-statutory procedures may not be queried by third party units or individuals, but when it comes to substantive sealing, Public security organs need to give more procedural cooperation and technical support, and so on. There are three main problems in the implementation of the system: first, the system is not specific enough, the stipulation is broad and detailed, and it lacks the necessary operation in practice. In particular, the applicable subject, object of decision, the specific procedure of the application of the elimination system, the legal effect after the elimination of the misdemeanor record, and so on, are not materialized, the second is that the external operating environment of the system is more obstructed. It not only conflicts with some relevant laws and regulations of our country, but also lacks the supporting system to guarantee its effective operation. Third, the relevant departments and personnel pay less attention to the system, which objectively hinders the smooth operation of the system and the development of related work. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part aims to study the basic issues of the system of eliminating minor misdemeanours, including the definition of concepts and theoretical basis analysis, in order to sum up the current research situation of this problem at home and abroad. In the second part, the author analyzes the main problems and shortcomings in the related work of G City. 1. The author makes a basic summary of the system in foreign countries and makes a clear definition of the scope of the study, and puts forward his own viewpoints on the basis of the above conclusions. The second part is to analyze the main problems and shortcomings in the relevant work of G City. The third part is based on summing up the overseas experience and combining G city work, puts forward some ideas to perfect this system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭新林;毛永強(qiáng);;前科消滅的內(nèi)容與適用范圍初探[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年09期

2 曾新華;;論未成年人輕罪犯罪記錄封存制度——我國新《刑事訴訟法》第275條之理解與適用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年06期

3 樊榮慶;;德國少年司法制度研究[J];青少年犯罪問題;2007年03期

4 熊瑛;;構(gòu)建未成年人前科消滅制度應(yīng)然與實(shí)然的沖突與平衡[J];法治研究;2010年10期

5 黃斌;;未成年人輕罪記錄封存制度的適用問題[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

6 莫湘益;;犯罪記錄封存的制度規(guī)范與功能延伸[J];湖南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

7 顧文;;對未成年人輕罪記錄消滅的思考和制度設(shè)計(jì)[J];中國檢察官;2009年10期

8 呂金芳;郭林將;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)語境下未成年人前科消滅制度的改革與構(gòu)建[J];北京人民警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

9 陳慈儉;;關(guān)于未成年人刑事污點(diǎn)消滅制度的法理分析[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

10 趙秉志;廖萬里;;論未成年人犯罪前科應(yīng)予消滅——一個(gè)社會學(xué)角度的分析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李振華;未成年人前科消滅制度研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2011年

2 馬黎燦;論我國未成年人前科消滅制度的構(gòu)建[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1805193