發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-24 18:20

  本文選題：執(zhí)行監(jiān)督 + 內(nèi)部監(jiān)督　； 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在民事執(zhí)行領(lǐng)域,"執(zhí)行難"、"執(zhí)行亂"已經(jīng)成為影響司法程序順利進(jìn)行的最后一道屏障,儼然已成為司法頑疾,而對(duì)執(zhí)行權(quán)的監(jiān)督不到位是造成執(zhí)行亂的主要原因之一,要解決執(zhí)行權(quán)運(yùn)行過(guò)程中存在的種種弊端,必須建立一套完整的執(zhí)行監(jiān)督理論以及運(yùn)行機(jī)制,用權(quán)力來(lái)有效監(jiān)督制約權(quán)力,為解決"執(zhí)行亂"提供高質(zhì)有效的門徑。關(guān)于執(zhí)行監(jiān)督權(quán)的研究,無(wú)論是法學(xué)界關(guān)于此問(wèn)題的研究,還是我國(guó)民事訴訟程序的實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀,關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)都集中在民事執(zhí)行的外部監(jiān)督尤其是對(duì)民事執(zhí)行工作的檢察監(jiān)督,而對(duì)民事執(zhí)行內(nèi)部監(jiān)督的研究卻乏人問(wèn)津,然而內(nèi)部監(jiān)督的有效運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)卻對(duì)執(zhí)行工作的順利進(jìn)行有著不可替代的效應(yīng),它不僅可以有效規(guī)范執(zhí)行權(quán)的行使,也可以最大程度上實(shí)現(xiàn)司法程序的公平,提高司法效率,本文是以執(zhí)行權(quán)的權(quán)力屬性為理論基礎(chǔ),針對(duì)執(zhí)行權(quán)所具有的行政權(quán)和司法權(quán)的雙重屬性,對(duì)執(zhí)行裁決權(quán)與執(zhí)行實(shí)施權(quán)進(jìn)行比較分析,尋求執(zhí)行權(quán)內(nèi)部監(jiān)督存在的問(wèn)題,從而提出相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:In the field of civil enforcement, "enforcement difficulty" and "enforcement disorder" have become the last barrier that affects the smooth progress of judicial process, and has become a stubborn judicial disease, and the lack of supervision over the enforcement power is one of the main reasons for the disorder. In order to solve the problems existing in the operation of executive power, it is necessary to establish a set of complete executive supervision theory and operation mechanism, to effectively supervise and restrict the power with power, and to provide a high quality and effective way to solve the "execution disorder". On the research of executive supervision power, whether the research on this issue in the legal circles or the implementation status of civil procedure in our country, the focus of attention is on the external supervision of civil execution, especially on the procuratorial supervision of civil execution. However, the effective operation of the internal supervision has an irreplaceable effect on the smooth implementation of the work, it can not only effectively regulate the exercise of executive power. It can also maximize the fairness of the judicial process and improve judicial efficiency. This paper is based on the power attribute of executive power, aiming at the dual attributes of executive power and judicial power. In this paper, the author makes a comparative analysis of the power of execution and the power of execution, and tries to find out the problems existing in the internal supervision of the power of execution, and then puts forward some relevant suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王亞明;;分權(quán)集約執(zhí)行:問(wèn)題及進(jìn)路[J];法治研究;2014年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳俊;執(zhí)行監(jiān)督機(jī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1797751