本文選題：訴調(diào)對(duì)接 + 馬克思主義�。� 參考：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制是我國多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的一項(xiàng)重要實(shí)踐成果,它在處理人民群眾內(nèi)部矛盾、化解糾紛方面有著充分利用社會(huì)資源、更加接近群眾等優(yōu)勢。社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期,如何建立多元化的糾紛解決機(jī)制,妥善處理發(fā)展中的社會(huì)糾紛,應(yīng)對(duì)人民群眾對(duì)司法的特殊需求,成為當(dāng)今維護(hù)最廣大人民的根本利益的關(guān)鍵。本文從馬克思主義群眾觀的視角研究訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制,以期為更加有效地化解人民群眾面臨的各類矛盾糾紛提供參考,進(jìn)而實(shí)現(xiàn)在馬克思主義群眾觀的指導(dǎo)下推進(jìn)其實(shí)現(xiàn)新的發(fā)展。本文主要由四部分構(gòu)成。第一部分為馬克思主義群眾觀的內(nèi)涵解讀,該部分對(duì)馬克思主義群眾觀的概念進(jìn)行了分析,指出了群眾觀的實(shí)踐價(jià)值和實(shí)踐路徑;第二部分為我國訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制現(xiàn)狀考察,該部分對(duì)訴調(diào)對(duì)接的概念進(jìn)行了界定,以山東省為例,介紹了當(dāng)前發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和運(yùn)行模式,結(jié)合當(dāng)前各地訴調(diào)對(duì)接實(shí)踐,從部門銜接渠道不暢、對(duì)接面窄、存在不公正隱患、調(diào)解網(wǎng)絡(luò)不夠完善、群眾認(rèn)知度低、缺乏立法支持和制度保障等方面總結(jié)出訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制服務(wù)群眾過程中存在的困難和問題,并結(jié)合馬克思主義群眾觀從主觀角度出發(fā)對(duì)機(jī)制運(yùn)行存在問題的原因進(jìn)行了分析,總結(jié)出了主觀方面的三個(gè)原因:執(zhí)行者以人為本服務(wù)群眾理念淡薄、人民群眾權(quán)力主體地位認(rèn)識(shí)不到位、不重視人民群眾作為社會(huì)變革的決定力量;第三部分為訴調(diào)對(duì)接價(jià)值分析,該部分結(jié)合馬克思主義群眾觀分析當(dāng)前訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制的正當(dāng)性和必要性;第四部分為馬克思主義群眾觀下訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制的完善,該部分從完善立法、加強(qiáng)宣傳、堅(jiān)持調(diào)解自愿和便民利民原則、拓寬對(duì)接范圍、健全相關(guān)制度、完善程序安排、完善調(diào)解員隊(duì)伍等七個(gè)方面提出了完善的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:The mechanism of mediation and docking is an important practical result of the diversified dispute settlement mechanism in China. It has the advantages of making full use of social resources and getting closer to the masses in dealing with the contradictions among the people and resolving disputes. In the period of social transformation, how to establish a diversified dispute resolution mechanism and properly deal with the social disputes in development should be dealt with properly. The special needs of the masses of the people have become the key to the fundamental interests of the majority of the people today. This paper studies the mechanism of mediation and docking from the perspective of Marx's view of the masses, in order to provide a reference for the more effective resolution of the contradictions and disputes that the people face, and to realize the guidance of the view of the masses of Marx. This article mainly consists of four parts. The first part is composed of four parts. The first part is the interpretation of the connotation of the mass view of the Marx doctrine. This part analyses the concept of the mass view of Marx, points out the practical value and the practice path of the mass view, and the second part is the investigation of the current situation of the mechanism of mediation and docking in China, and the part of this part of the mediation and docking of the lawsuit. The concept is defined. Taking Shandong Province as an example, the current development status and operation mode are introduced, and combined with the current practice of mediation and docking in various parts of the country, the connection channels are not smooth, the docking surface is narrow, there is an unfair hidden danger, the mediation network is not perfect, the mass awareness is low, and the legislative support and system guarantee are lacking. The difficulties and problems existing in the process of serving the masses are analyzed, and the reasons for the existing problems in the operation of the mechanism are analyzed in the light of Marx's view of the masses, and the three reasons are summed up. The third part is the decisive force of the social change; the third part is the value analysis of the mediation and docking. This part analyzes the legitimacy and necessity of the current mediation and docking mechanism combined with the view of the Marx doctrine. The fourth part is the perfection of the mechanism of the mediation and docking under the mass view of the Marx doctrine, and the part from perfecting the legislation, strengthening the propaganda and insisting on the mediation. The seven aspects of the principle of voluntariness and convenience and benefit to the people, widening the range of docking, perfecting the relevant system, perfecting the program arrangement and perfecting the contingent of mediators, have put forward perfect countermeasures and suggestions.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張邦鋪;;訴調(diào)對(duì)接糾紛解決機(jī)制及其完善——基于S省P縣法院的實(shí)證分析[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

2 谷正;;群眾路線:馬克思主義群眾觀的中國化[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2015年01期

3 李德恩;;論雙向度的“訴調(diào)對(duì)接”機(jī)制及其建構(gòu)[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

4 馬國鈞;;科學(xué)把握和踐行馬克思主義群眾觀[J];思想政治教育研究;2014年04期

5 張紅俠;;失調(diào)與調(diào)適:法院在訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制構(gòu)建中的角色分析[J];淮北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

6 潘劍鋒;;民訴法修訂背景下對(duì)“訴調(diào)對(duì)接”機(jī)制的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年03期

7 陸而啟;;簡論訴調(diào)對(duì)接程序的意見共通[J];福建江夏學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

8 劉同君;儲(chǔ)曉雷;;論“訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制”之正當(dāng)性——基于江蘇經(jīng)驗(yàn)的思考[J];江蘇大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

9 胡峧;宋昱君;;論訴調(diào)對(duì)接的法理基礎(chǔ)與價(jià)值訴求[J];湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期

10 牟成文;;馬克思的群眾觀及其哲學(xué)變革[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王韻潔;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期農(nóng)村糾紛處理機(jī)制研究[D];中共中央黨校;2013年

2 程凱;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的糾紛解決研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2013年

3 彭貴才;論政府在糾紛處理中的作用及模式[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1778577