本文選題：結(jié)構(gòu)功能 + 家事糾紛��； 參考：《重慶工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：家庭是社會(huì)生活的基本單位,家庭矛盾的處理關(guān)系到家庭的穩(wěn)固,家和才能萬(wàn)事興,家庭和諧與社會(huì)的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展息息相關(guān)。家事糾紛解決機(jī)制作為獨(dú)立完整的一個(gè)社會(huì)系統(tǒng),其結(jié)構(gòu)的優(yōu)化、功能的實(shí)現(xiàn)都需要一個(gè)基礎(chǔ)理論保駕護(hù)航,結(jié)構(gòu)功能理論下構(gòu)建家事糾紛解決機(jī)制,能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)社會(huì)資源整合,迎合家庭糾紛處理的特殊性,平和中化解矛盾,保溫家人之間情感,恢復(fù)家庭和氣,保障社會(huì)安定。對(duì)糾紛解決機(jī)制的研究離不開(kāi)社會(huì)背景環(huán)境,家事糾紛解決機(jī)制的變遷脫離不開(kāi)社會(huì)宏觀結(jié)構(gòu)的影響。長(zhǎng)期的改革開(kāi)放與市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì),促使中國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)、政治體制不斷變革,多種矛盾交織涌現(xiàn),社會(huì)紊亂成分增加不絕,糾紛解決機(jī)制作為處理糾紛、維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的最后一道屏障,在新的時(shí)期應(yīng)被政府納入綜合治理的構(gòu)架之下。近年學(xué)者普遍關(guān)注糾紛解決機(jī)制的微觀層面,如對(duì)個(gè)案調(diào)解及其調(diào)解模式、民間法與習(xí)慣法同國(guó)家法的關(guān)系等方面的研究,這些研究對(duì)構(gòu)建我國(guó)新時(shí)期的糾紛解決機(jī)制有著不可藐覷的作用,但它們不免有些忽視宏觀層面的研究,要知道事物一切的外部表象均與其內(nèi)在深層結(jié)構(gòu)存在千絲萬(wàn)縷的聯(lián)系,所以本文正是從深層的社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)開(kāi)啟研究,將視角著力在宏觀層面。本文主要通過(guò)分析結(jié)構(gòu)功能理論(主要指帕森斯時(shí)代)的基本內(nèi)容和家事糾紛的基礎(chǔ)理論入手,推演出家事糾紛解決機(jī)制構(gòu)建的理論依據(jù),分析我國(guó)家事糾紛獨(dú)有的特點(diǎn),總結(jié)出家事糾紛解決機(jī)制構(gòu)建的社會(huì)實(shí)踐依據(jù)。指出我國(guó)現(xiàn)有家事糾紛解決機(jī)制的問(wèn)題,通過(guò)借鑒澳大利亞、德國(guó)等國(guó)家在處理家事糾紛方面的先進(jìn)做法,結(jié)合結(jié)構(gòu)功能理論的指導(dǎo),探求我國(guó)家事糾紛解決機(jī)制的構(gòu)建。本文通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)研究,分析結(jié)構(gòu)功能理論的基本內(nèi)容和核心觀點(diǎn),為家事糾紛解決機(jī)制的構(gòu)建提供具有理論意義的指導(dǎo)。通過(guò)邏輯分析法分析家事糾紛與其他民事糾紛的不同,結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)有家事糾紛處理機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀,提出具有針對(duì)性的完善意見(jiàn)。通過(guò)對(duì)澳大利亞、美國(guó)、德國(guó)等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家現(xiàn)有家事糾紛處理機(jī)制的研究,結(jié)合我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化和新時(shí)期的價(jià)值觀,提出構(gòu)建我國(guó)家事糾紛解決機(jī)制的理論架構(gòu)和部分實(shí)務(wù)改進(jìn)措施。
[Abstract]:Family is the basic unit of social life. The settlement of family contradictions is closely related to the stability of family, family harmony and the harmonious development of society.As an independent and complete social system, the family dispute resolution mechanism needs a basic theory to guarantee the optimization of its structure and function. The construction of family dispute resolution mechanism under structure-function theory can realize the integration of social resources.It caters to the particularity of the family dispute resolution, resolves the contradiction in peace, preserves the emotion between the family and the family, recovers the family harmony and ensures the social stability.The research on the dispute settlement mechanism can not be separated from the social background environment, and the change of the family dispute settlement mechanism can not be separated from the influence of the macro structure of the society.The long-term reform and opening up and the market economy have prompted China's economic structure, political system to constantly change, a variety of contradictions intertwined and emerging, and the elements of social disorder have been increasing. The dispute resolution mechanism serves as a dispute resolution mechanism.The last barrier to social stability should be brought under the framework of comprehensive management in the new period.In recent years, scholars have generally paid attention to the micro level of dispute resolution mechanism, such as the case mediation and its mediation model, the relationship between folk law and customary law and national law, and so on.These studies play an important role in constructing the dispute resolution mechanism in the new period of our country, but they can't help but ignore the macro-level research. We should know that all external appearances of things are inextricably related to their inner and deep structure.Therefore, this paper starts the research from the deep social structure and focuses on the macro level.By analyzing the basic contents of the theory of structure and function (mainly referring to the Parsons era) and the basic theory of family disputes, this paper deduces the theoretical basis for the construction of the settlement mechanism of family disputes, and analyzes the unique characteristics of family disputes in our country.Summarizes the social practice basis for the construction of family dispute resolution mechanism.This paper points out the problems of the existing family dispute resolution mechanism in our country, and probes into the construction of the family dispute resolution mechanism of our country by referring to the advanced practices of Australia, Germany and other countries in dealing with the family dispute, combined with the guidance of the theory of structure and function.Through literature research, this paper analyzes the basic contents and core viewpoints of structural function theory, and provides theoretical guidance for the construction of family dispute resolution mechanism.This paper analyzes the differences between family disputes and other civil disputes by means of logical analysis. Combined with the present situation of domestic dispute handling mechanism in China, the author puts forward some suggestions for perfection.Through the research on the existing mechanism of handling family disputes in developed countries such as Australia, the United States, Germany, and other developed countries, combining the traditional culture of our country and the values of the new era,This paper puts forward the theoretical framework and some practical improvement measures of the family dispute resolution mechanism in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹思婕;;我國(guó)家事審判改革路徑之探析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2016年05期

2 孫馮英;;糾紛解決中ADR思路的法理依據(jù)及其合理性分析[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

3 熊金才;;論婚姻家庭法立法價(jià)值取向的多元化——以法社會(huì)學(xué)為視角[J];中華女子學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年06期

4 戴凌玉;;英美ADR糾紛解決機(jī)制的設(shè)立背景[J];法制博覽;2015年23期

5 歐偉明;季如莉;;鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷與民事糾紛解決路徑選擇[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年15期

6 羅漂;;家事糾紛ADR機(jī)制的構(gòu)建[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期

7 蔣月;馮源;;臺(tái)灣家事審判制度的改革及其啟示——以“家事事件法”為中心[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

8 許少波;;家事糾紛類型化分析[J];江海學(xué)刊;2014年03期

9 董玉鵬;;結(jié)構(gòu)功能理論下涉外知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛訴調(diào)對(duì)接機(jī)制研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年06期

10 范愉;;訴訟社會(huì)與無(wú)訟社會(huì)的辨析和啟示——糾紛解決機(jī)制中的國(guó)家與社會(huì)[J];法學(xué)家;2013年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 曾學(xué)智;社會(huì)學(xué)視野下的法治研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2010年

2 來(lái)文彬;家事調(diào)解制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

3 宋明;人民調(diào)解糾紛解決機(jī)制的法社會(huì)學(xué)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 易可;我國(guó)家事糾紛解決機(jī)制的完善[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年

2 常曉茗;傳統(tǒng)家庭分工與現(xiàn)代社會(huì)參與的對(duì)立：女性角色內(nèi)沖突[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

3 孟慧;家事糾紛解決機(jī)制研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

4 李s，

本文編號(hào)：1761098